UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant   ☐
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   ☐
Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(1) and
0-11.

[MISSING IMAGE: cv_ofc-4c.jpg]

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

[MISSING IMAGE: lg_granitepoint-pn.jpg]



NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

March 27, 2018  |  NYSE: GPMT

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

Stockholders,

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., it is my pleasure to invite you to our 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be heldconducted virtually via live webcast, on Thursday, June 6, 2024, at the Loews Regency Hotel located at 540 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, on Tuesday, May 15, 2018, at 9:10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

2017 was a groundbreaking year We believe that hosting our annual meeting virtually will make the meeting more accessible for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. We became a publicly traded company onall our stockholders.

The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GPMT” in June when we completed an initial public offering of $195 million of our common stock. We also grew in 2017, originating over $1.2 billion in high-quality floating rate senior loans, bringing our loan portfolio commitmentsbusiness to over $2.7 billionbe conducted at the end ofAnnual Meeting and details regarding access to the year and further expanding our presence in the commercial real estate lending markets. To support this growth, we were able to successfully access the capital markets again in December, issuing convertible senior notes in a private offering in which we ultimately raised approximately $144 million.  We were also able to upsize two of our loan financing facilities in the fourth quarter by a combined $350 million, bringing our already substantial borrowing capacity to a total of $2.3 billion. In 2018, we remain focused on growing our company and our high credit quality portfolio in a disciplined manner that protects our stockholders’ capital while maximizing risk-adjusted returns.

We hope you consider attending our first Annual Meeting.webcast. It is important that your shares of common stock be represented at our Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares you hold and whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person.virtual meeting. Accordingly, we encourage you to authorize your vote as soon as possible by following the instructions contained in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that you receive for our Annual Meeting.

The accompanying NoticeMeeting, or, if you have elected to receive a paper or email copy of the proxy materials, by completing, signing and returning the proxy card that is provided.

We hope you are able to attend our virtual 2024 Annual Meeting of StockholdersMeeting. We appreciate your continued support and Proxy Statement describe the confidence demonstrated by your investment in Granite Point.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_jacktaylor-bw.jpg]
Sincerely,
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_johnataylor-bw.jpg]
John A. Taylor
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
April 22, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_gpicon-pn.jpg]
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
MEETING LOGISTICS
When:
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_when-pn.jpg]
Thursday, June 6, 2024 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
Where:
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_where-pn.jpg]
You can attend the meeting by logging into virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2024 and following the instructions provided on your Notice of Availability.
Who:
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_people-pn.jpg]
You may vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a holder of our common stock as of the close of business on April 8, 2024.
Voting:
You are encouraged to vote in one of the following ways prior to the meeting.
Stockholders of Record
By Internet
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_internet-pn.jpg]
Please access the website www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions provided on the Notice of Availability or proxy card.
By Telephone
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_phone-pn.jpg]
Please call the number and follow the instructions provided on the Notice of Availability or proxy card.
By Mail
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_mail-pn.jpg]
Please complete, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the reply envelope included with the paper proxy materials.
Beneficial Owners
If you hold your shares in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, which is similar to the voting procedures for stockholders of record.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2024:
Our 2024 Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, are available at www.proxyvote.com
VOTING ITEMS
ProposalsBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos1-pn.jpg]
To elect as directors the six nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos2-pn.jpg]
To approve on an advisory basis the
compensation of our named executive officers
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos3-pn.jpg]
To approve on an advisory basis the frequency of future advisory votes regarding the compensation of our named executive officers
EVERY
YEAR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos4-pn.jpg]
To ratify the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as our
independent auditor for our
fiscal year ending December 31, 2024
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.jpg]
We will also transact such other business to be conducted atas may properly come before the Annual Meeting and details regarding admission to the Annual Meeting. We are using the “Notice and Access” method of furnishing proxy materials to you over the Internet. This process provides you with a convenient and quick way to access our proxy materials and vote your shares, while allowing us to reduce the environmental impact and cost of printing and distributing our proxy materials. any adjournment or postponement thereof.
On or about March 27, 2018,April 22, 2024, we will commencebegin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains information regarding how to access our proxy materials and vote.

vote, to stockholders unless they have directed us to provide the materials in a different manner. Certain stockholders will continue to receive a printed set of proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy card or voting instructions. Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

To attend the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2024. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_michaeljkarbernew-gray.jpg]
Michael J. Karber
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
April 22, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
2
About Our Company2
Meeting Information4
Voting Roadmap4
11
19
Governance Documents19
Director Independence19
Board Leadership Structure20
Committee Member Qualifications20
Committee Responsibilities20
Board and Committee Meetings22
Board, Committee and Director Assessment23
Role of Our Board in Risk Oversight24
Director Nomination Process and Considerations25
Director Commitments25
Majority Vote Standard for Director Elections25
Communications with Our Board26
Investor Engagement27
Director Orientation and Continued Education27
Director Compensation27
30
Related Person Transactions Policy30
Transactions with Related Persons30
31
31
32
33
36
Executive Compensation Overview37
How Executive Compensation Is Determined39
Executive Compensation Components41
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices51
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
Proxy Summary
This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before voting. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully.
About Our Company
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (NYSE: GPMT) is an internally managed real-estate finance company that focuses primarily on directly originating, investing in and managing senior floating-rate commercial mortgage loans and other debt and debt-like commercial real estate (CRE) investments. We appreciate your supportoperate as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code.
We are a long-term, fundamental value-oriented investor. We construct our investment portfolio on a loan-by-loan basis, emphasizing rigorous credit underwriting, selectivity and diversification, and we assess each investment from a fundamental value perspective relative to other opportunities available in the market.
GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. TIMELINE
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_crepla-pn.jpg]
INTERNALIZATION
As noted in the timeline above, we were externally managed by Pine River Capital Management L.P., or our Former Manager, through 2020. We entered into a definitive agreement with our Former Manager on October 10, 2020, pursuant to which we internalized our management function on December 31, 2020. Our internal management structure and the confidence demonstratedaccompanying enhancements in disclosure and transparency provide us with a differentiated platform that is more closely aligned with our stockholders’ interests.
Benefits of Internal Management Structure for Our Stockholders
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]

Reduced operating expenses and created opportunities to realize increased economies of scale

Eliminated management fee based on stockholders’ equity

Executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based cash and equity awards that incorporate financial and non-financial goals

Compensation Committee approval  –  and transparent disclosure  –  of all components of executive compensation, not just equity awards

Alignment of capital markets activities with stockholder interests
2 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
OUR INVESTMENT STRATEGY
Our investment strategy is to directly originate, invest in and manage a portfolio of primarily senior floating-rate commercial real estate loans and other debt and debt-like instruments secured by yourvarious types of institutional quality commercial properties located in attractive markets across the United States and managed by experienced owners. These loans may vary in term and may bear interest at a fixed or floating rate basis, although our primary focus is on floating-rate loans. We typically provide intermediate-term bridge or transitional financing for a variety of purposes, including acquisitions, recapitalizations, refinancings and a range of collateral property business plans, including lease-up, renovation, repositioning and repurposing of the commercial property.
From time to time, we may also directly originate and invest in mezzanine loans, subordinated mortgage interests (sometimes referred to as a B-note) and other real estate securities, as well as invest in preferred equity investments and other investments that are subordinated or otherwise junior in an issuer’s capital structure and that involve privately negotiated structures. In certain situations, we may also hold REO (real estate owned) as a result of taking title to our loan’s collateral. The only securities we currently own are the retained interests from our securitization financing transactions. Our investment objective is to generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders over the long term, primarily through dividends, and to preserve our stockholders’ capital through business cycles. We believe that the stability of our capital base is important to our ability to invest in assets that generate attractive returns on an ongoing basis. We intend to achieve these objectives by further growing our already well-diversified investment portfolio over the long term and actively managing the various risks associated with our business strategy.
As a long-term, fundamental value-oriented investor, we may adjust our investment strategy as we react to evolving market dynamics. We believe there are enduring opportunities within our target investments that present attractive, risk-adjusted returns. However, as economic and business cycles develop, we may expand and/or adjust our investment strategy and target investments to capitalize on various investment opportunities. We believe that our well-diversified portfolio and flexible investment strategy will allow us to actively adapt to changing market conditions and generate attractive, long-term returns for our stockholders in a variety of environments.
Portfolio and Capitalization Snapshot(1)
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_finance4-pn.jpg]

Broadly diversified 100% loan portfolio comprised of 73 discrete investments totaling $2.9 billion in commitments and $2.7 billion outstanding principal balance

99% senior loans with an average commitment of $37 million, a weighted average stabilized LTV(2) of 63.6% and yield(2) of 8.3%

Capitalized with approximately $0.9 billion of equity and a well-balanced funding profile with approximately 56% non-mark-to-market borrowings, moderate leverage of 2.1x debt-to-equity(2) and no remaining corporate debt maturities
(1)
All information as of December 31, 2023
(2)
See definition in the Appendix
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
Meeting Information
DATE & TIME:
Thursday, June 6, 2024
10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
VIRTUAL MEETING:
This year’s meeting will be held virtually at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2024
RECORD DATE:
Holders of common stock at the close of business on April 8, 2024, are eligible to vote
MEETING AGENDA:
1.
To elect as directors the six nominees named in this proxy statement
2.
To approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers
3.
To approve on an advisory basis the frequency of future advisory votes regarding the compensation of our named executive officers
4.
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent auditor for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2024
5.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof
Voting Roadmap
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos1-pn.gif]
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee. These individuals bring relevant experiences and perspectives that are essential to good governance and leadership of our Company.
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
(See Page 11)
4 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
NOMINEE SNAPSHOT
NomineeAgeDirector
Since
IndependentPrimary OccupationCommittees
AuditCompN&CG
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_kasnet-pn.jpg]
Stephen G. Kasnet
Chair of the Board
782017
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.gif]
Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Harbor Global Company, Ltd.C
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_jacktaylor-pn.jpg]
John (“Jack”) A.
Taylor
682017CEOPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_dehne-pn.jpg]
Tanuja M. Dehne522017
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.gif]
Former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Geraldine R. Dodge FoundationMC
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_mcgrath-pn.jpg]
Sheila K. McGrath592023
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.gif]
Former Senior Managing Director, EvercoreMM
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sanders-pn.jpg]
W. Reid Sanders742017
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.gif]
President of Sanders Properties, Inc.MMM
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_woodhousebw-pn.jpg]
Hope B. Woodhouse672017
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.gif]
Former Chief Operating Officer of Bridgewater Associates, LPMC
Number of Meetings in 2023Full Board: 11885
Comp = Compensation   N&CG = Nominating & Corporate Governance   C = Chair   M = Member
NOMINEE CHARACTERISTICS
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_board-pn.jpg]
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Independent Chair
Independent
committees
Majority voting
Our Chief Executive Officer focuses on managing our Company while our independent Board Chair drives accountability at the Board level
All our Board committees are composed entirely of independent directorsWe have a majority standard for uncontested elections of directors and a resignation policy for directors who do not receive a majority of the votes cast
Annually elected
board
Board assessments
Executive sessions
We do not have a classified board – each of our directors is elected annually for a one-year term
A rigorous self-assessment process helps our Board evaluate its performance and identify and address any potential gapsOur independent directors hold regular executive sessions, with the independent Board Chair presiding
Director education
Stock ownership
guidelines
Director commitments
Our Director Education Policy empowers our directors to be well versed in principles of corporate governance and other critical subject matters
Each independent director is expected to accumulate equity interests in an amount equal to three times the director’s annual cash retainerA director may not serve on more than three other boards of public companies in addition to our Board, and a director who is a CEO may not serve on more than one other board
Board diversity
ESG oversight
Investor outreach
We take reasonable steps to assemble a diverse pool of nominees when conducting searches for new directors, and any search firm we engage is instructed to seek to include diverse candidates
With the leadership of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board oversees our Company’s approach to environmental, social and governance mattersIn addition to our standard investor engagement conducted at conferences and through non-deal roadshows and one-on-one meetings, we invite our largest investors to have an annual conversation on corporate governance topics
No hedging or
pledging
Single class of
common stock
No political
contributions
We prohibit short sales, transactions in derivatives, hedging and pledging of our securities by directors, executive officers and employees
Each share of our common stock has one voteIn accordance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Company will not contribute to political candidates, parties or campaigns
6 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE PROGRAM
Program Foundations
At Granite Point, we are committed to identifying and responding to business risks and opportunities related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. We are also committed to being a responsible, ethical corporate citizen, an employer of choice for talented professionals, and a positive member of the communities where we live and work.
Granite Point.

Sincerely,

John A. Taylor

Point Core Values

Our core values guide us in building and maintaining productive long-term relationships
internally and with our investors, business partners, communities and other stakeholders.
They inform what we do and how we do it, including our ESG program.
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_core-pn.jpg]
Board Oversight of ESG Matters
As reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board oversees our approach to ESG matters and reviews periodic reports from management on related topics. Our Board has assigned duties and responsibilities to its independent committees through their charters to help our Board fulfill its oversight function.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides leadership by assisting the Board in overseeing our overarching ESG approach, and each of the three committees has oversight responsibility for several specific ESG matters consistent with that committee’s overall purpose, as outlined below.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Reviewing, and assisting our Board in overseeing, our ESG priorities, strategies and related public disclosures

Recommending to our Board changes to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

Reviewing and advising the Board with respect to Board composition, structure and membership

Compensation Committee

Reviewing our human capital management strategies and practices, which may include those
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 7

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
related to recruiting, retention, non-executive compensation, employee engagement, professional development, and diversity, equity and inclusion

Determining compensation of executive officers

Evaluating risks arising from our compensation plans and programs

Audit Committee

Overseeing risks to which our Company is exposed – including those arising from data security issues, climate change and other environmental matters – as well as our assessment and management of such risks

Overseeing our compliance and ethics programs
Management’s Cross-Functional Approach to ESG
We have assembled an ESG working group that reports to our Chief Executive Officer and consists of members from our loan originations, human resources, legal, financial reporting and investor relations functions. This working group meets regularly and has been charged with providing leadership in the following areas:

Identifying the most significant risks and opportunities that ESG matters represent for our business and the most significant impacts that ESG matters have on our business partners, investors, employees, communities and other stakeholders. The group does this work through reflection on the members’ subject matter expertise, consideration of stakeholder priorities communicated to members, and reference to external reporting standards and peer disclosures.

Developing strategies and responsive measures to address ESG risks and opportunities while generating positive impacts

Communicating Granite Point’s ESG priorities, strategies and measures to other team members in all-hands and smaller group meetings, in training sessions, and through the development of policies and other materials distributed to all personnel

Preparing disclosures to provide our external stakeholders information about the ESG matters we have identified as being most significant to our Company, as well as the strategies and responsive measures we have developed
Overview of the Most Significant ESG Matters for Our Company
Guided by our core values and the oversight of our Board, we have identified the following topics as being the most significant ESG matters for our business and stakeholders. You can find more information about these topics on our website at www.gpmtreit.com/esg. Note that information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Environmental
Social
Governance
Climate change and other environmental factors pose risks to our investment portfolio that we must actively manage, and we also recognize our responsibility to operate our business in a manner that limits negative environmental impactsOur social commitment is centered on human capital management – that is, providing resources and support to attract, develop and retain our team of talented professionals – as well as positively engaging with the communities where we operate in New York and MinnesotaA strong governance framework – including an effective ethics and compliance program, thoughtful attention to information security and privacy concerns, and quality corporate governance practices at the Board level – is critical to our long-term success as a real-estate finance company
8 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos2-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this advisory “Say on Pay” proposal. Our executive compensation program is designed to reward performance and align with stockholders’ interests.
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
(See Page 69)
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO:

Attract, retain and incentivize the best talent to support our business objectives;

Pay for performance by linking compensation to the achievement of short-term and long-term financial and strategic goals;

Align the interests of our named executive officers, or NEOs, and stockholders by tying elements of executive compensation to corporate performance and generated returns; and

Ensure fair, equitable and competitive pay practices.
2023 TARGET TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_ceo-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_neo-pn.jpg]
SAY ON PAY RESULTS IN 2023
Approximately 95% of the votes cast at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation program as described in our proxy statement for that meeting. Our Say on Pay voting results have been consistently high, with approval rates of approximately 97% at our 2022 annual meeting and approximately 96% at our 2021 annual meeting.
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_shareowner-pn.jpg]
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
QUALITY COMPENSATION PRACTICES
What We Do
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]

A significant portion of each NEO’s compensation is at risk

We have adopted meaningful stock ownership requirements applicable to our NEOs

Our independent Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant who provides no other services to our Company

Performance-based cash and equity awards have a sliding scale earn-out structure that allows for 0% payouts and is capped at 200% of target amounts

Our performance-based equity awards use both absolute and relative performance metrics

Our Compensation Committee conducts an annual compensation risk assessment

We hold an annual Say on Pay vote
What We Don’t Do
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_dont-bw.jpg]

Our NEOs do not receive perquisites or retirement plans not available to other employees

We do not allow our NEOs to hedge or pledge their Company stock

We do not have single-trigger accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change of control of our Company, and our equity plan does not use a liberal definition of “change of control”

Our equity plan does not use liberal share recycling

We do not pay dividends on any performance-based equity units that are not earned through satisfaction of the awards’ performance metrics

We do not provide tax gross-ups

Our NEOs’ employment agreements do not provide for excessive severance payments
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos3-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY APPROVAL OF FREQUENCY OF SAY ON PAY VOTES
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote on an advisory basis to hold future Say on Pay votes EVERY YEAR.
EVERY YEAR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
(See Page 70)
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos4-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
(See Page 71)
10 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Bylaws, or Bylaws, each of our directors is elected by stockholders each year at our annual meeting to serve terms expiring at the next annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Our Bylaws provide that our Board may be comprised of no fewer than the number of directors required by the Maryland General Corporation Law and no more than 15, with the precise number to be set by our Board.
Our Board currently has six members, each of whom has been nominated by the Board for election at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on June 6, 2024, or the Annual Meeting. The directors were all elected by the stockholders at the 2023 annual meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.
Key Skills and Qualifications
We have highly qualified director nominees who reflect a broad and diverse mix of business backgrounds, skills and experience. We believe that each of our director nominees possesses high standards of ethics, integrity and professionalism, sound judgment and a commitment to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders.
It is particularly important that the following skills and qualifications are represented on our Board so that it can oversee our Company effectively:
Key Skill or Qualification#Connection to Granite Point’s Strategy
Real Estate or REIT6Directors with extensive knowledge of, and/or experience in, the real estate sector and/or REITs have the knowledge needed to set and oversee our strategy
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management6Directors with experience overseeing corporate strategy (including M&A and capital markets transactions) and/or balance sheet management (including funding and capital allocation strategies) help evaluate value-creating opportunities for our Company and our stockholders
Finance or Accounting6Directors with strong financial literacy and experience reviewing financial reporting and internal controls enhance our Board’s ability to oversee our strategy and drive accurate and transparent reporting to our stockholders
Credit or Principal Investing5Directors with experience in credit investing and/or principal investing provide valuable perspectives that inform our strategy and long-term, fundamental, value-driven investment philosophy
Operations and Management5Directors with operations and management experience help guide our Company through various economic, credit and interest rate cycles and enhance our Board’s ability to develop and oversee our internal operations and business strategy
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience4Directors with experience serving on public company boards or on organizations with a governance focus help promote a culture of accountability and transparency on our Board, in addition to instituting corporate governance policies that protect stockholder interests
(continued)
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Key Skill or Qualification#Connection to Granite Point’s Strategy
ESG2Directors with experience evaluating and overseeing ESG efforts, including but not limited to environmental sustainability and diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, allow our Company to build and maintain a long-term, responsible business model, and deepen relationships with our investors, business partners, other stakeholders and communities
Investor Communications and Outreach2Directors with experience understanding the investor perspective and/or maintaining deep institutional relationships enhance our investor communications and outreach practices as a publicly traded company
Nominee Skills and Qualifications Matrix
The following matrix portrays the foregoing key skills and qualifications and the self-identified demographic characteristics of the six director nominees standing for election to our Board at the Annual Meeting. Our directors have had varied experiences, and for each of them the matrix below indicates the skills and qualifications that are most salient to his or her service on our Board.
KasnetTaylorDehneMcGrathSandersWoodhouse
Real Estate or REIT
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet
Management
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Finance or Accounting
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Credit or Principal Investing
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Operations and Management
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
ESG
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Investor Communications and Outreach
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Demographic Characteristics
Women
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Ethnic/Racial Minorities
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.jpg]
Please read the nominee biographies that follow for more detailed information regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each director nominee that led our Board to conclude that he or she should be nominated to serve on our Board, as well as other biographical information as of April 1, 2024.
12 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_kasnet-pn.jpg]
Chair of the Board and Independent Director
Committee(s):
Audit (Chair)
STEPHEN G. KASNET
Age: 78
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – Through various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Silver Bay Realty Trust, Bradley Real Estate Trust and Harbor Global, Mr. Kasnet has extensive REIT and real estate sector experience
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – In various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp. and Silver Bay Realty Trust, Mr. Kasnet has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and in balance sheet management
Finance or Accounting – As a qualified financial expert on the Audit Committee, Mr. Kasnet has the experience and financial literacy to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Credit or Principal Investing – As a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp., former CEO of Pioneer First Voucher Fund and former President of Pioneer Real Estate Investors, among other positions, Mr. Kasnet has experience investing in real estate and other real estate products
Operations and Management – Through various executive roles in the real estate and mortgage REIT industry, Mr. Kasnet has the right expertise to help develop and oversee our business strategy and has a broad perspective on operational matters
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – Mr. Kasnet has served as a director for multiple public companies, including Two Harbors Investment Corp (NYSE: TWO), Silver Bay Realty Trust (NYSE: SBY), Columbia Laboratories (NASDAQ: CBRX) and Rubicon (NZX: RBC)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President and CEO, Harbor Global and CEO, PIOglobal Investment Fund (a subsidiary of Harbor Global) (2000-2006)

CEO, Pioneer First Voucher Fund (Russia) (2000-2006)

President, Pioneer Global Institutional Advisors (1995-2000)

President, Pioneer Real Estate Investors (1993-2000)

Director and Member of the Executive Committee, The Bradley Real Estate Trust (1995-1999)

President, Cabot, Cabot and Forbes Asset Management (1990-1993)

Additional senior management positions with other financial organizations, including First Winthrop Corporation and Winthrop Financial Associates
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Member of the Risk Oversight Committee, Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO) (2009-present)

Director, Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. (NYSE: SBY) (2012-2017)

Chairman of the Board, Rubicon (NZX: RBC) (2008-2018)

Director, First Ipswich Bancorp (2008-2020)

Director, GoodBulk, an ocean cargo carrier (2017-2019)

Chairman of the Board, Tenon Ltd., a timberland owner and wood product producer (2016-2018)

Chairman of the Board, Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRX) (2004-2015)

Director, Republic Engineered Products, a specialty steel manufacturer (2002-2008)

Director, FTD, a florist collective (2001-2005)

Chairman of the Board, Warren Bank & Warren Bancorp. (1990-2003)
ORGANIZATIONS

Trustee, The Governor’s Academy, a private coed boarding high school in Byfield, Massachusetts
EDUCATION

BA, University of Pennsylvania
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 13

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_jacktaylor-pn.jpg]
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
JOHN (“JACK”) A. TAYLOR
Age: 68
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – Through various management and real estate group leadership positions at asset management firms, including PGIM Real Estate Investors, UBS and PaineWebber, and membership in the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council and President’s Council of the Real Estate Roundtable, Mr. Taylor has extensive real estate sector experience
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – As a leader in the real estate groups at Prudential Real Estate Investors, UBS, PaineWebber and Kidder, Peabody & Co., Mr. Taylor has extensive experience managing corporate strategy in the real estate sector – including by effecting transactions and raising capital – and the right experience to manage our balance sheet and funding profile
Finance or Accounting – Through various management positions at real estate finance companies, Mr. Taylor brings strong financial literacy and a deep expertise in real estate finance fundamentals
Credit or Principal Investing – As partner of Five Mile Capital and Head of Global Real Estate Finance at Prudential Real Estate Investors, Mr. Taylor has developed deep knowledge of debt products and asset-based lending in the real estate space
Operations and Management – As President and CEO of Granite Point and through various management positions at asset management firms, Mr. Taylor has extensive knowledge of our Company and the right experience to oversee our Company’s operations and business strategy
Investor Communications and Outreach – As President and CEO of Granite Point and through various management positions at asset management firms, Mr. Taylor has extensive experience with investor communications practices
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President and CEO, Granite Point Mortgage Trust (2017-present)

Global Head of Commercial Real Estate, Pine River Capital Management (2014-2020)

Managing Director, Head of Global Real Estate Finance, Member of the Global Management Committee and Chair of the Global Investment Committee for debt and equity, Prudential Real Estate Investors (now known as PGIM Real Estate Company) (2009-2014)

Partner, Five Mile Capital Partners (2003-2007)

Co-Head of Real Estate Investment Banking for the Americas and Europe, UBS

Head of Real Estate Group and Member of the Operating Committee, PaineWebber

Head Trader and Manager of CMBS and Principal Commercial Mortgage business, Kidder, Peabody & Co.
ORGANIZATIONS

Founding Governor and Member, Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (formerly known as the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association)

Member, President’s Council of the Real Estate Roundtable

Chairman of the Board, Innocence Project, an organization that works to free the innocent, prevent wrongful convictions and create fair, compassionate and equitable systems of justice for everyone, guided by science and grounded in antiracism
EDUCATION

JD, Yale Law School

MSc, International Relations, London School of Economics and Political Science

BA, University of Illinois
14 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_dehne-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair), Compensation
TANUJA M. DEHNE
Age: 52
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – As a director at Silver Bay Realty Trust, Ms. Dehne developed knowledge of REITs and the real estate sector
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – In various director and management positions, including at Silver Bay Realty Trust, Advanced Disposal Services and NRG Energy, as well as in private legal practice, Ms. Dehne has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital market and other strategic opportunities
Finance or Accounting – Through her experience as a corporate and securities attorney, service on the Audit Committee of Silver Bay Realty Trust and her experience overseeing the investment management of an endowment, Ms. Dehne has the financial literacy to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Operations and Management – Through various roles and spans of control at NRG Energy and the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Ms. Dehne has operational and management experience that enhances our Board’s ability to develop and oversee our operations and business strategy; through various roles at NRG Energy, including Chief Administrator and Senior Vice President of Human Resources, Ms. Dehne has operational experience in managing human capital
ESG – As an executive and director at the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation and Climate Real Impact Solutions II Acquisition Corp., respectively, Ms. Dehne has provided experience elevating and providing perspective regarding environmental, sustainability and social justice issues and best practices
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – With over two decades teaching, advising and serving on corporate boards, and as Chair of the Advisory Board of the Gupta Governance Institute at Drexel University, Ms. Dehne provides corporate governance expertise to our Board
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President and CEO, Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, a private foundation that supports, centers, and connects communities and changemakers who are addressing the root causes and repair of structural racism and inequity in New Jersey (2019-2024)

NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG) (2004-2016)

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrator and Chief of Staff

Additional roles included: Senior Vice President, Human Resources; Secretary and Deputy/Assistant General Counsel

Practiced corporate law as a member of the business department, Saul Ewing (1999-2004)
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Director, Climate Real Impact Solutions II Acquisition Corp. (NYSE: CLIM.U) (2021-2022)

Director, Advanced Disposal Services (NYSE: ADSW) (2017-2020)

Director, Silver Bay Realty Trust (NYSE: SBY) (2012-2017)
ORGANIZATIONS

Chair, Advisory Board of the Gupta Governance Institute, Drexel University, an institute that advocates for improved governance practices for public, private and nonprofit organizations through programming, knowledge sharing and research

Trustee, Lafayette College

Trustee, New York Public Radio

Trustee, AAPIP (Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders in Philanthropy)

Trustee, Philanthropy New York

Member, Nominating and Governance Peer Group Steering Committee, Women Corporate Directors

Faculty Member, NACD Board Advisory Services
EDUCATION

JD, Syracuse University

MA, Political Science, University of Pennsylvania

AB, Lafayette College
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 15

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_mcgrath-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Audit, Nominating & Corporate Governance
SHEILA K. McGRATH
Age: 59
Director Since: 2023
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – Given her background as a senior REIT research analyst and involvement with several industry organizations such as the Real Estate Investment Advisory Council (REIAC) and National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), Ms. McGrath has a strong understanding of REITs and the real estate sector
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – As a senior equity research analyst for over 25 years, with the past 10 years at Evercore, Ms. McGrath has broad expertise in analyzing and evaluating the financial and public market considerations of M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and brings valuable insight into our balance sheet management policies
Finance or Accounting – Through her 25+ years of experience as a REIT research analyst, Ms. McGrath has deep expertise in REIT fundamentals and valuation, and she is a qualified financial expert on the Audit Committee
Credit or Principal Investing – As a commercial real estate appraiser with the Member of Appraisal Institute (MAI) designation while at CB Commercial, Ms. McGrath brings deep knowledge of commercial real estate valuation and feasibility analysis conducted for financial institutions and institutional investors for both equity investment and debt financing purposes
Investor Communications and Outreach – Given her sell-side research expertise, Ms. McGrath has both an acute understanding of the investor perspective and deep institutional relationships, which enhance our investor communications and outreach
ESG – Through her roles with NAREIT’s Dividends Through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative and the Gaining and Retaining Outstanding Women program at Rutgers Business School’s Center for Women in Business, Ms. McGrath has experience leading on diversity, equity and inclusion in our industry
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Senior Managing Director, Equity REITs, Real Estate Operating Companies, Evercore (2012-2022)

Managing Director, Senior Vice President and Member of the Research Review and Leadership Committees, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods (2007-2012)

Senior equity research analyst covering REITs for more than 20 years at other financial organizations, including Smith Barney, UBS and Dresdner Kleinwort

Valued commercial real estate properties in the real estate advisory and valuation group at CB Commercial
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Director and Member of the Life Science, Agtech & Advanced Technologies Committee, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE) (2023-present)
ORGANIZATIONS

Member of the Advisory Board of Governors, Real Estate Investment Advisory Council (REIAC), and former member of the Steering Committee of the Dividends Through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative and Best Financial Practices Committee, NAREIT

Founding Member of the Board of the Center for Women in Business and Mentor for GROW (Gaining and Retaining Outstanding Women), Rutgers Business School

Associate Member of a variety of industry organizations including International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and the U.S. Green Building Council
EDUCATION

MBA, Finance and Real Estate, Rutgers University

AB, Lafayette College
16 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sanders-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Audit, Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance
W. REID SANDERS
Age: 74
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – In various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Silver Bay Realty Trust, Mid-America Apartment Communities and Sanders Properties, Mr. Sanders has extensive REIT and real estate sector experience
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – In various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Mid-America Apartment Communities, Silver Bay Realty Trust and Sanders Properties, Mr. Sanders has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and in balance sheet management
Finance or Accounting – Through Mr. Sanders’ extensive background in the financial services industry, he possesses strong financial literacy and experience to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Credit or Principal Investing – As a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. and former executive at Southeastern Asset Management, Longleaf Partners Mutual Funds and First Tennessee Investment Management, among others, Mr. Sanders has extensive investing experience
Operations and Management – In various director and management positions at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Mid-America Apartment Communities and Sanders Properties, among others, Mr. Sanders has experience managing operations in the real estate industry
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – Mr. Sanders has served as a director for multiple public companies, including Two Harbors Investment Corp (NYSE: TWO), Mid-America Apartment Communities (NYSE: MAA) and Silver Bay Realty Trust (NYSE: SBY)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President, Sanders Properties (2004-present)

Investment Committee Member, Cypress Realty (2002-present)

Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, Southeastern Asset Management

President, Longleaf Partners Mutual Funds

Investment Officer, First Tennessee Investment Management
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Director and Member of the Audit, Compensation and Risk Oversight Committees, Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO) (2009-present)

Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Mid-America Apartment Communities (NYSE: MAA) (2010-present)

Director and Member of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Strategic Planning Committees, Independent Bank (2004-present)

Advisory Board Member, SSM Venture Partners III (2000-present)

Director, Silver Bay Realty Trust (NYSE: SBY) (2015-2017)

Chairman of the Board, Two Rivers Capital Management (2004-2007)

Director, Harbor Global (2001-2006)

Director, PIOglobal Asset Management (2001-2006)

Director, TBA Entertainment (2000-2004)

Director, The Pioneer Group (1999-2000)
ORGANIZATIONS

Chairman of the Board, Hugo Dixon Foundation

Trustee, Dixon Gallery and Gardens Endowment Fund, and Dixon Gallery and Gardens
EDUCATION

BA, University of Virginia
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 17

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_woodhousebw-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Compensation (Chair), Audit
HOPE B. WOODHOUSE
Age: 67
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – As a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp., Ms. Woodhouse has developed knowledge of REITs and the real estate sector
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – Through various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Piper Jaffray and Seoul Securities, Ms. Woodhouse has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and in balance sheet management
Finance or Accounting – As a qualified financial expert on the Audit Committee, Ms. Woodhouse has the experience and financial literacy to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Credit or Principal Investing – As a former executive at Bridgewater Associates, Soros Fund Management, Tiger Management and Salomon Brothers, Ms. Woodhouse brings extensive investing experience
Operations and Management – As a former executive at Bridgewater Associates, Soros Fund Management, Tiger Management and Salomon Brothers, Ms. Woodhouse brings extensive management and operations experience, including the oversight of human resources
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – Ms. Woodhouse has served as a director for multiple public companies, including Two Harbors Investment Corp (NYSE: TWO), Piper Jaffray (NYSE: PJC), Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE: AKR) and Monro (NASDAQ: MNRO)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Chief Operating Officer, Bridgewater Associates (2005-2009)

President and Chief Operating Officer, Auspex Group (2003-2005)

Chief Operating Officer, Soros Fund Management

Treasurer, Tiger Management

Managing Director, Salomon Brothers
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Trustee and Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee, Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE: AKR) (2023-present)

Director and Member of the Compensation and Audit Committees, Monro, Inc. (NASDAQ: MNRO) (2023-present)

Director, Chair of the Risk Oversight Committee and Member of the Audit Committee, Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO) (2012-present)

Director, Atomyze (2020-2022)

Director, Piper Jaffray (NYSE: PJC) (2011-2014)

Director, Seoul Securities (2001-2003)
ORGANIZATIONS

Member, Children’s Services Advisory Committee of Indian River Country

Trustee, Tiger Foundation
EDUCATION

MBA, Harvard University

AB, Georgetown University
Voting Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos1-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee. These individuals bring relevant experiences and perspectives that are essential to good governance and leadership of our Company.

FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
18 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Corporate Governance and
Board Matters
Governance Documents
Our Board is committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in conjunction with our Charter, Bylaws and Board committee charters, provide the framework for the corporate governance practices described in this proxy statement.
We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees, and specifically to our principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to detect and deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and other public communications;

Appropriate treatment of confidential corporate information;

A safe and healthy work environment that is free from discrimination and harassment;

Compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

Fair dealing with counterparties, suppliers, competitors, colleagues and others;

Fair competition when interacting with competitors and business partners;

Protection and proper use of Company assets;

Prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to appropriate persons identified therein; and

Accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also establishes that our Company will not make contributions to political candidates, political parties or political campaigns or to intermediary organizations such as political action committees.
You can access our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on our website at www.gpmtreit.com or by writing to our Investor Relations department by email to investors@gpmtreit.com or by regular mail to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
Director Independence
New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, listing standards require that a majority of a company’s board of directors be composed of “independent directors,” which is defined generally as a director having no material relationship with the company that, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Consistent with the foregoing, our Board has affirmatively determined, upon the review and recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that each of the following directors and director nominees meets the qualifications of an independent director:

Tanuja M. Dehne;

Stephen G. Kasnet;
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 19

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Sheila K. McGrath;

W. Reid Sanders; and

Hope B. Woodhouse.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board is led by a Chair who is appointed annually by the directors to perform such duties and exercise such powers as from time to time shall be prescribed by our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines or by our Board. Under our governance documents, both independent and non-independent directors are eligible for appointment as the Chair, and our Board is able to change its leadership structure if it determines that such a change is appropriate and in the best interest of our Company.
Our Board has appointed Stephen G. Kasnet, who qualifies as an independent director, to serve as its Chair. As detailed in his biographical statement above, Mr. Kasnet brings a wealth of corporate leadership and industry experience to the position.
Among other things, Mr. Kasnet’s work as Chair includes presiding at meetings of the full Board and meetings of stockholders, calling and leading executive sessions of our independent directors, consulting with management and the Board committee chairs in establishing the agenda for Board and Board committee meetings, and helping facilitate communication between the CEO and the Board. Our Board believes that separating the Chair role from the CEO role provides the appropriate balance at this time between the authority of those who oversee our Company and those who manage it on a day-to-day basis.
Committee Member Qualifications
Our Board has formed three standing committees: the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Each committee is composed solely of directors who meet the independence requirements of the NYSE, including with respect to our Compensation Committee, the NYSE’s independence requirements specific to members of listed companies’ compensation committees. Additionally, our Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of “non-employee directors,” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
In accordance with NYSE rules, each member of our Audit Committee is financially literate, in that he or she is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. In addition, our Board has determined that Stephen G. Kasnet, Sheila K. McGrath and Hope B. Woodhouse qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as defined under SEC rules and regulations.
Committee Responsibilities
Information about the current membership and key responsibilities of each of our standing committees follows. The committees’ purpose and responsibilities are more fully set forth in their charters, which are available on our website or at the address listed under “Governance Documents” above. The committees review their charters at least annually.
20 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Stephen G. Kasnet (Chair)
Sheila K. McGrath
W. Reid Sanders
Hope B. Woodhouse
Meetings in 2023: 8
Key Responsibilities:

Review interim financial information and audited financial statements included in reports filed with the SEC;

Review financial information included in earnings press releases issued by our Company;

Produce the Audit Committee Report;

Review the adequacy and effectiveness of our Company’s system of internal accounting controls;

Review our Company’s assessment and management of its risk exposures;

Review, approve and oversee any related person transactions as defined by SEC rules and regulations;

Oversee our Company’s compliance and ethics programs;

Oversee our Company’s internal audit activities; and

Be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditor.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Hope B. Woodhouse (Chair)
Tanuja M. Dehne
W. Reid Sanders
Meetings in 2023: 8
Key Responsibilities:

Establish our Company’s general compensation philosophy for the CEO and other executive officers;

Determine all matters relating to the compensation of the CEO and other executive officers, including corporate goals and objectives tied to compensation;

Administer, review and make recommendations to our Board with respect to our Company’s incentive compensation plans;

Review and recommend to our Board compensation programs applicable to directors;

Review our Company’s human capital management strategies and practices;

Review and assess the incentives and risks arising from our Company’s compensation programs and plans; and

Produce the Compensation Committee Report.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 21

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Tanuja M. Dehne (Chair)
Sheila K. McGrath
W. Reid Sanders
Meetings in 2023: 5
Key Responsibilities:

Assist our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to assure that our Company is governed in a manner consistent with the interest of its stockholders;

Recommend to our Board changes in the size, composition, organization and operational structure of the Board and its committees;

Recommend to our Board director nominees to stand for election or re-election, conducting a search to identify a nominee or nominees in the event of a vacancy or newly created Board seat;

Make recommendations to our Board regarding director qualifications, eligibility criteria and independence;

Review, and assist our Board in overseeing, our Company’s ESG priorities, strategies and related public disclosures; and

Oversee the evaluation of the effectiveness of our Board, its committees and directors (see “Board, Committee and Director Assessment” below for detailed information).
Board and Committee Meetings
Our Board meets on a regularly scheduled basis during the year to review significant developments affecting our Company and to act on matters requiring Board approval. It also holds special meetings when important matters require Board action between scheduled meetings. It met 11 times in 2023. Members of senior management regularly attend Board meetings to report on and discuss their areas of responsibility. In addition, our Board and its committees are able to consult with and retain independent legal, financial or other advisors as they deem necessary and appropriate from time to time. The independent directors have the opportunity to meet in executive session, without management present, at each Board meeting. Mr. Kasnet presides over these sessions as our Board’s independent Chair.
Directors are encouraged to attend all meetings of our Board and of the Company’s stockholders. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings held by our Board and all committees on which he or she served during 2023. Each of our directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders held in June 2023.
22 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Board, Committee and Director

Assessment

Our Board conducts an annual assessment of its performance and the performance of its committees and individual directors. The Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (abbreviated as “N&CG Committee” below) is responsible for leading the assessment, which takes place in advance of the annual consideration of director nominees. The assessment is used to inform director nomination considerations and identify opportunities to enhance Board and committee effectiveness, including the relationship between management and our Board and committees.
The assessment carried out in early 2024 followed the process depicted below.
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_direct-pn.jpg]

NOTICE
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 23


TABLE OF ANNUAL MEETINGCONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Role of Our Board in Risk Oversight
Our management team is responsible for assessing and managing the risks faced by our Company, subject to the oversight of our Board. Management routinely informs our Board and its committees of developments that could affect our risk profile or other aspects of our business. Our Board fulfills its oversight responsibilities as a full Board or through delegation to its committees as described below.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board exercises broad oversight of our Company’s risk management, including through the review of our business plans, capital structure and financial results. Our Board has also established investment guidelines, which set parameters for the type and size of investments management can make without further Board approval.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
This committee is primarily responsible for reviewing our Company’s assessment and management of its risk exposures:

Guidelines and policies to govern risk management and assessment;

The adequacy of our Company’s insurance coverage;

Any uninsured or commercially uninsurable risks;

Our Company’s interest rate risk management;

Our Company’s counterparty and credit risks;

Our Company’s information security and technology risks (including cybersecurity); and

Any environmental risks relating to our Company, including those related to climate change.
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
COMMITTEE
This committee recommends appropriate corporate governance practices.
It also reviews our Company’s ESG priorities, strategies and public disclosures.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
This committee is responsible for assessing the risks arising from our compensation programs and plans.
It also reviews our human capital management strategies and practices.
24 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF STOCKHOLDERS

Date:Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Time:9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Location:Loews Regency Hotel, 540 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065

Agenda:(1)CONTENTS

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Director Nomination Process and Considerations
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to our Board the range of qualifications that should be represented on our Board and eligibility criteria for membership on our Board and its committees, as well as recommending director nominees to stand for election or re-election to our Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the following qualification standards applicable to our directors:

Possession of the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;

The ability to exercise good business judgment and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our Company and its stockholders;

Having an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment; and

The ability and willingness to devote sufficient time and effort to carrying out Board duties and responsibilities effectively.
In considering candidates for nomination as a director to fill an existing vacancy or add a member, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts a search to identify potential candidates based on their mix of skills and qualifications and the contribution that the candidate could be expected to make to the overall functioning of our Board. With respect to the re-nomination of incumbent directors, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the foregoing factors, as well as past participation in, and contributions to, the activities of our Board and its committees. Our Board has not adopted term limits or a mandatory retirement age because it believes that a director’s tenure is more appropriately determined through the Board assessment and re-nomination processes.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that our Company shall endeavor to have a Board representing diverse education and experience that provides knowledge of business, financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. Our Company also considers diversity of gender, race, ethnicity, age and background in the composition of our Board. To electthat end, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take reasonable steps to assemble a diverse pool of nominees when conducting searches for new directors, and any search firm engaged by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be affirmatively instructed to seek to include diverse candidates.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended for nomination to our Board by our stockholders. Stockholder recommendations for nominees to our Board should be submitted in writing to our Secretary. The manner in which our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates recommended by stockholders is the same as directorsany other candidate, except that the nine nomineescommittee will also seek and consider information concerning any relationship between a stockholder recommending a candidate and the candidate to determine whether the candidate can represent the interests of all of our stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will not consider a candidate recommended by a stockholder unless the stockholder’s proposal provides a certification that the potential candidate consents to being named in the accompanyinga proxy statement eachrelating to the stockholders’ meeting and will serve as a director if elected.
Director Commitments
In furtherance of our expectation that directors devote significant time to their service on our Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors who also serve as chief executive officers or hold equivalent positions at other public companies should not serve on more than one other public company board in addition to our Board, and other directors should not serve on more than three other boards of public companies in addition to our Board. Our Audit Committee charter further provides that members of that committee may not serve on more than two other audit committees for publicly listed companies.
Majority Vote Standard for Director Elections
Our Bylaws provide that in uncontested elections (which occurs when the number of director nominees equals the number of directors to be elected), a nominee for director will be elected to the Board if the number of votes cast “for” the nominee’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that nominee’s election.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 25

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
If a director nominee who is an incumbent director receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election, and with respect to whom no successor has been elected, such incumbent director shall promptly tender his or her offer to resign to our Board for its consideration following certification of the stockholder vote. Within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider the tendered resignation offer and make a recommendation to our Board whether or not to accept such offer, and our Board shall act on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation.
In determining whether to accept the resignation offer, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board may consider any factors they deem relevant, including, among other things, whether accepting the resignation of such director would cause our Company to fail to meet any applicable SEC or NYSE rules or requirements. Thereafter, our Board shall promptly and publicly disclose its decision-making process regarding whether to accept the director’s resignation offer or the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable, in a Current Report on Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. Any director who tenders his or her resignation offer will not participate in our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or our Board’s action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. If our Board does not accept the director’s resignation offer, such director will continue to serve until ourthe next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or hersuch director’s successor is duly elected and qualified;

(2)qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.

In a contested election, the director nominees who receive a plurality of all the votes cast at a meeting of stockholders duly called and at which a quorum is present will be elected as directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of nominees equal to the number of vacancies to be filled who receive more votes than other nominees are elected to our Board, regardless of whether they receive a majority of votes cast.
Communications with Our Board
We provide the opportunity for our stockholders and all other interested parties to communicate with members of our Board. Stockholders and all other interested parties may communicate with the independent directors or the chair of any of the committees of our Board by email or regular mail. All communications should be sent to the Company’s Secretary, Michael J. Karber.
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_internet-pn.jpg]
BY EMAIL
Please send correspondence via email to secretary@gpmtreit.com
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_mail-pn.jpg]
BY MAIL
Please send correspondence via regular mail to the attention of the independent directors, the Chair of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Compensation Committee or the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as the case may be, in each instance in care of the Secretary at the Company’s office at 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
Our Secretary will review each communication received in accordance with this process to determine whether the communication requires immediate action. Our Secretary will forward all appropriate communications received, or a summary of such communications, to the appropriate member(s) of our Board. However, we reserve the right to disregard any communication that we determine is unduly hostile, threatening or illegal, does not reasonably relate to our Company or is similarly inappropriate. Our Secretary has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications.
Stockholder proposals must be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our current Bylaws or the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and not the procedures set forth in the preceding paragraph or the procedures set forth in “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors – Director Nomination Process.” Nominations for our Board may only be made in accordance with the procedures set
26 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
forth in our Bylaws. Certain matters set forth in our Bylaws for stockholder proposals, including nominations to our Board, as well as certain matters set forth in Rule 14a-8 for stockholder proposals, are described later in this proxy statement under “Other Matters – Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2025 Annual Meeting.”
Investor Engagement
We engage with many of our equity and fixed-income investors through targeted investor outreach, holding one-on-one meetings, and attending real estate lending industry and equity/fixed-income investor conferences. In addition, we invite our largest stockholders to have an annual conversation on corporate governance topics, including ESG, executive compensation and disclosure.
Director Orientation and Continued Education
We provide each new director with a comprehensive orientation, including our Company’s business operations, strategy and governance. We also provide new directors with the opportunity to meet in one-on-one sessions with our Chief Executive Officer, other directors and other members of senior management.
In addition, we believe that our stockholders are best served by a board of directors composed of individuals who are well-versed in modern principles of corporate governance and other subject matters relevant to board service, and who thoroughly comprehend the role and responsibilities of an effective board in the oversight of our Company and its management. To hold an advisory vote relatingthis end, we have adopted a formal Director Education Policy under which our directors are encouraged to attend such director education programs as they deem appropriate to stay abreast of developments in corporate governance and “best practices” relevant to their contribution to our Board generally, as well as to their responsibilities in their specific committee assignments and other roles. We reimburse our directors for their reasonable costs and attendance fees to participate in such programs up to $5,000 per director each year.
We also include director education sessions in our Board meetings periodically. These sessions may be led by members of management or by external advisors and cover a range of topics relevant to the directors’ service on our Board.
Director Compensation
We compensate the independent members of our Board for their service. We believe that director compensation should achieve the following objectives:
Align the interests of our directors and our stockholders
Attract and retain outstanding director candidates to provide meaningful oversight of our business
Reflect the substantial time commitment our directors make to their Board and committee service
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION CONSIDERATIONS
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to our Board regarding the compensation of our Company’s independent directors, which is set forth in our Director Compensation Policy. In doing so, our Compensation Committee will work with an independent compensation consultant and consider, among other things, the following:

The compensation that is paid to directors of other companies that are comparable to our Company;

The amount of time directors are expected to devote to preparing for and attending meetings of our Board and the committees on which they serve;

The success of our Company;

The additional responsibilities and time commitment associated with being a chair of our Board or one of its committees;
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 27

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters

If a committee on which a director serves undertakes a special assignment, the importance of that special assignment to our Company and its stockholders; and

The risks involved in serving as a director on our Board or a member of its committees.
ANNUAL RETAINERS FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
Under our Director Compensation Policy, we pay retainers to our independent directors in an equal mix of cash and equity. The cash retainers are paid quarterly in arrears, and the equity is awarded as restricted stock units, or RSUs, that are granted each year on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. The RSUs vest on the one-year anniversary of their grant date, with pro-rated vesting for a departure before that anniversary. Independent directors who join our Board between annual meetings receive a pro-rated RSU award on the date of their appointment that vests on the first anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting. The RSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that, upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, pay out with respect to all outstanding RSUs.
Our Director Compensation Policy provides for the annual payments to independent directors described in the table below:
Cash
($)
Restricted
Stock
Unit Awards
($)
Board
Chair160,000160,000
Other Directors100,000100,000
Audit Committee
Chair10,00010,000
Other Members5,0005,000
Compensation Committee
Chair6,2506,250
Other Members3,7503,750
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Chair6,2506,250
Other Members3,7503,750
We do not pay retainers to directors who are not independent. All members of our Board, including directors who are not independent, are reimbursed for their costs and expenses of serving on our Board, including costs and expenses of attending Board and committee meetings. Directors may also be reimbursed for up to $5,000 per year for continuing education costs incurred in connection with their service on our Board.
SUPPLEMENTAL CHAIR COMPENSATION
In addition to the annual retainers set forth above, our current Board Chair, Stephen G. Kasnet, has been awarded supplemental compensation in recognition of the extraordinary administrative burdens placed on him in 2020 related to our Company’s transition from external management to internal management and the COVID-19 pandemic.
The supplemental chair compensation is payable in additional RSUs to be granted on an annual basis over a four-year period with a value of $155,000 per grant, subject to Mr. Kasnet’s continued service on our Board, for an aggregate award value of $620,000. The first of these four annual grants was made on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders in 2021, and the second and third were made on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Each of the supplemental RSU grants has the same vesting and dividend equivalent provisions as the annual retainer RSU grants.
28 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Our directors are encouraged to own shares of our Company’s common stock to better align their personal interests with the interests of our stockholders. In furtherance of this objective, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each independent director is expected to accumulate shares of common stock with a minimum market value equal to three times such director’s annual cash retainer. Unvested RSUs are included in determining whether a director has satisfied the applicable minimum ownership level.
A director is expected to attain the minimum ownership level within five years of appointment or election. If the minimum amount is not attained by such date – or is not maintained after such date – the director is expected to retain at least 50% of the shares issued upon settlement of equity awards (net of shares sold to pay taxes associated with the awards) until attaining the ownership level. Our Compensation Committee reviews director stock ownership annually to confirm compliance with these ownership and retention requirements.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2023
The following table shows the compensation paid to the individuals who served as independent directors of our Board during any part of the year ended December 31, 2023. John (“Jack”) A. Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board, did not receive any compensation for his service as a director; the compensation he received as an executive officer is reported in the Summary Compensation Table later in this proxy statement.
NameFees Earned
or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
(1)(2)
($)
Total
($)
Tanuja M. Dehne110,000110,000220,000
Stephen G. Kasnet170,000324,997494,997
Sheila K. McGrath104,331108,749213,080
W. Reid Sanders112,500112,496224,996
Hope B. Woodhouse112,826111,246224,072
(1)
The values in this column represent the fair value of awards of RSUs computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and are based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date of the applicable award.
(2)
The independent directors held the following number of unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2023:
NameRestricted Stock Units
Ms. Dehne22,869
Mr. Kasnet67,567
Ms. McGrath22,609
Mr. Sanders23,388
Ms. Woodhouse23,128
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 29

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Certain Relationships and Transactions
Certain Relationships and Transactions
Related Person Transactions Policy
Our Board has adopted a written Related Person Transactions Policy setting forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval of transactions between our Company and its Related Persons. “Related Persons” under the policy include our directors, director nominees, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, plus those persons’ immediate family members and affiliated entities, as defined in the policy.
The policy requires that the Audit Committee review and approve all transactions, arrangements or relationships, or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which:

Our Company is or will be a participant;

The expected amount involved exceeds $120,000; and

A Related Person has or will have a material direct or indirect interest.
The policy directs the Audit Committee to approve such a transaction only if it determines that the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of our Company and its stockholders.
Transactions with Related Persons
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
We have entered into customary indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers that require us to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and our Articles of Amendment and Restatement against any claim or liability that may arise by reason of their service to us. The agreements also require us to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. In addition, each agreement provides for procedures for the determination of entitlement to indemnification, including requiring that such determination be made by independent counsel after a change in control of our Company.
30 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Security Ownership and Reporting
Security Ownership and Reporting
Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “GPMT.” The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 15, 2024, by each of our “Named Executive Officers,” as such term is defined in Item 402(a) of Regulation S-K, and directors and by all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares of common stock if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to those shares or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days of March 15, 2024. “Voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.
Under our Insider Trading Policy, our officers, directors and employees are prohibited from hedging or pledging shares of our stock in any manner, whether as collateral for a loan, in a margin account held at a broker or otherwise.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percent
of Class
(2)
Directors
Tanuja M. Dehne33,558*
Stephen G. Kasnet80,838(3)*
Sheila K. McGrath7,138*
W. Reid Sanders122,679 (4)*
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor(5)
307,586*
Hope B. Woodhouse55,312*
Named Executive Officers
Stephen Alpart152,088*
Peter Morral80,073*
Steven Plust201,822*
Marcin Urbaszek93,756(6)*
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 individuals)1,167,8162.3%
*
Represents ownership of less than 1.0% of our outstanding common stock as of March 15, 2024.
(1)
The business address of each of the individuals is 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
(2)
Based on 50,793,057 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2024.
(3)
Includes 312 shares of common stock held by the Kasnet Family Foundation, over which Mr. Kasnet has shared voting and investment control with his spouse, and 80,526 shares of common stock Mr. Kasnet owns jointly with his spouse.
(4)
Includes 12,000 shares of common stock held by Green Meadows, LLC. Mr. Sanders is the managing member and a 2% owner of Green Meadows, LLC.
(5)
Mr. Taylor is also a Named Executive Officer.
(6)
Includes 94 shares of common stock held by Mr. Urbaszek’s mother.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 31

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Security Ownership and Reporting
Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent
of Our Common Stock
Based on their filings made under Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act, the persons known by us to be beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock are as follows:
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerNumber of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percent
of Class
(1)
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 100
5,394,244(2)10.6%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
2,811,904(3)5.5%
(1)
Based on 50,793,057 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2024.
(2)
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 8, 2024, by BlackRock, Inc. reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 5,264,270 shares, shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 0 shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares reported.
(3)
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024, by The Vanguard Group reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 23,510 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 2,763,193 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 48,711 shares.
32 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Information about Our Executive Officers
Information about Our
Executive Officers
The following sets forth the positions, ages and selected biographical information for our executive officers as of April 1, 2024. John (“Jack”) A. Taylor’s biographical information is provided in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Proposal 1: Election of Directors.” There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he was selected as an executive officer.
Stephen Alpart
Age: 60
Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

Mr. Alpart has been our Vice President and Chief Investment Officer since our Company’s inception in 2017. He is also our Co-Head of Originations and a member of our Investment Committee.

From 2014 to 2020, he was a Managing Director at Pine River Capital Management, L.P., our Former Manager.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, Mr. Alpart was a Managing Director in the Global Real Estate Finance Group at Prudential Real Estate Investment (now known as PGIM Real Estate Company) from 2009 to 2014, responsible for managing a series of close-end debt funds in the United States.

Previously, Mr. Alpart was a Managing Director in the Real Estate Group at GMAC Commercial Mortgage and Capmark Investments where he focused on originating, underwriting and closing large structured commercial real estate loans for private equity firms and private owner/operators. Prior to that, he was a Managing Director in the Real Estate Group at PaineWebber & Co., an investment bank and stock brokerage firm, and later an Executive Director in the Real Estate Group of UBS Group AG, a Swiss multinational investment bank and financial services company, where he focused on originating, underwriting and closing large structured commercial real estate loans for private equity firms and owner/operators.

He has worked in real estate finance and debt investing for over 25 years in a variety of functions, including third-party funds management, proprietary on-book lending, transaction advisory business, loan syndications, loan sales and workouts/ restructurings.

Mr. Alpart received an MBA, Finance and Real Estate. From New York University and a BS in Business Administration, Accounting and Economics from Washington University.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 33

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Information about Our Executive Officers
Michael Karber
Age: 44
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Mr. Karber has served as our Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer since 2020. He has been with our Company since its inception in 2017, previously serving as Deputy General Counsel from 2018 to 2019 and as Assistant Secretary from 2018 to 2020.

Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Karber was Lead Counsel – Business Operations at Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO), a hybrid mortgage real estate investment trust, beginning in 2014.

Prior to joining Two Harbors, he was a Portfolio Manager at Presidium Asset Solutions, an asset management and loan servicing company, from 2010 to 2014.

From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Karber was an Associate at Pircher, Nicols & Meeks LLP, and he was previously an Associate at Schwartz Cooper Chartered (now known as Dykema Gossett PLLC).

Mr. Karber received a JD from Northwestern University, Pritzker School of Law, and a BA in Political Science and Psychology from the University of Michigan.
Peter Morral
Age: 56
Vice President and Chief Development Officer

Mr. Morral has been our Vice President and Chief Development Officer since 2020 and has been our Co-Head of Originations and a member of our Investment Committee since our Company’s inception in 2017.

From 2014 to 2020, he was a Managing Director at our Former Manager.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, he served as a Managing Director in Annaly Capital’s Commercial Real Estate Group.

Prior to joining Annaly Capital, Mr. Morral was a Managing Director and member of the Investment Committee at UBS Securities, LLC where he was responsible for institutional client and large loan originations, investment banking coverage, subordinate debt pricing and distribution and loan syndications.

He has worked in real estate finance and debt investing for over 20 years in a variety of functions, including on-balance sheet lending, syndications and investing, credit policy and underwriting, and CMBS loan originations, pricing, ratings and credit distribution.

Mr. Morral received an MBA from the Ohio State University and a BLA in History from the University of Connecticut.
34 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Information about Our Executive Officers
Steven Plust
Age: 65
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Plust has been our Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since our Company’s inception in 2017. He is also a member of our Investment Committee.

From 2014 to 2020, he was a Managing Director at our Former Manager.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, Mr. Plust was a Managing Director in the Global Real Estate Finance Group at Prudential Real Estate Investment (now known as PGIM Real Estate Company) from 2009 to 2014, responsible for managing a series of close-end debt funds in the United States.

He has over 25 years of experience in real estate finance and capital markets and was an advisor to the Resolution Trust Corporation in the development and implementation of its securitization programs.

Mr. Plust has worked for over 20 years in principal investing platforms on Wall Street and in investment management, where he has been primarily responsible for transaction pricing and structuring, credit risk assessment and analysis of complex transactions and multi-asset portfolios.

Mr. Plust received an MBA from Columbia University and a BS in Chemistry from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Marcin Urbaszek
Age: 48
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Mr. Urbaszek has been our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Head of Investor Relations since our Company’s inception in 2017.

He joined our Former Manager in May 2013 and, until the formation of our Company, served as a Managing Director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO), a hybrid mortgage real estate investment trust, focusing on corporate development and capital markets activities.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, Mr. Urbaszek worked in the Investment Banking Division at Credit Suisse Group AG from 2006 to April 2013, most recently serving as a team lead and partner on coverage and strategic transaction execution for various financial institutions, including residential and commercial mortgage lenders.

He has over 20 years of finance experience, including capital markets and equity research, with the last 15+ years dedicated to financial institutions.

Over the course of his career, Mr. Urbaszek has been primarily responsible for strategic and capital raising transaction execution, as well as financial planning and analysis.

Mr. Urbaszek received a BBA in Finance, with a Minor focused on Financial Accounting and Economics, from Zicklin School of Business, Bernard M. Baruch College, CUNY. Mr. Urbaszek is a CFA® charterholder.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 35

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Discussion
and Analysis
This “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, or CD&A, describes our compensation program for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. These Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, are as follows:
JOHN (“JACK”)
A. TAYLOR
MARCIN
URBASZEK
STEPHEN
ALPART
PETER
MORRAL
STEVEN
PLUST
President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorVice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerVice President and Chief Investment OfficerVice President and Chief Development OfficerVice President and Chief Operating Officer
CD&A Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OVERVIEW
p. 37

Program Evolution

Executive Compensation Components Awarded in 2023

2023 Target Pay Levels

Summary of Results Under Performance-Based Awards

Quality Compensation Practices
HOW EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IS DETERMINED
p. 39

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Roles and Responsibilities in Executive Compensation Decisions

Employment Agreements

Peer Group

Say on Pay Vote
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTS
p. 41

2023 Base Salary

2023 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) Awards

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) Awards Granted in 2023

2021 PSU Award Results (2021-2023 Performance Period)

Benefits
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES
p. 51

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Prohibition Against Hedging and Pledging

Clawback Policy

Compensation Risk Assessment
36 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
Executive Compensation Overview
PROGRAM EVOLUTION
Until December 31, 2020, we were externally managed by Pine River Capital Management L.P., our Former Manager. We entered into a definitive agreement with our Former Manager on October 10, 2020, pursuant to which we internalized our management on December 31, 2020, or the Internalization. Prior to the Internalization, our NEOs were employed by an affiliate of our Former Manager who provided them with base salary, annual cash incentives and benefits, and we reimbursed our Former Manager for certain executive compensation costs it incurred on our behalf. Although we did not directly pay regular cash compensation to our NEOs prior to the Internalization, we did grant them equity awards to align their interests with those of our stockholders.
Our Compensation Committee instituted a comprehensive executive compensation program for our internally managed company in 2021 that was designed to incentivize, reward and retain our executive officers and align their interests with stockholders’ interests. The transition to being an internally managed company had profound implications for our executive compensation program and disclosure, and we caution placing significant reliance on any trailing analyses that include compensation results prior to the Internalization.
The overall structure of the executive compensation program implemented in 2021 remained consistent for 2022 and then was adjusted in 2023 to diversify the financial performance metrics used in the annual and long-term incentive awards.
The components and pay levels of the compensation paid to our NEOs in 2023 are summarized in this “Executive Compensation Overview” section. Please read the remainder of this CD&A and the tabular and narrative disclosure that follows for more complete information about the compensation paid to our NEOs in 2023.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTS AWARDED IN 2023
CashBase Salary

Intended to provide market-competitive fixed income

Only element of total direct compensation not at performance risk
Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)

Target amount is 100% of base salary for CEO and 75% of base salary for each of the other NEOs

Performance period: 2023

Pays out at 0% – 200% of target amount

Performance metrics:

50% financial measures – “Run-Rate” ROAE (return on average equity) and Change in Book Value per Share, weighted evenly

50% strategic objectives fundamental to the business
EquityPerformance Stock Units (PSUs)

50% of equity award value delivered as PSUs

Performance period: 2023-2025

Vests at 0% – 200% of target number of units

Performance metrics:

25% Absolute “Run-Rate” ROAE

25% Relative “Run-Rate” ROAE

25% Absolute Change in Book Value per Share

25% Relative Change in Book Value per Share
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

50% of equity award value delivered as RSUs

Three-year ratable vesting
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 37

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
2023 TARGET PAY LEVELS
Named Executive Officer2023
Base Salary
Target AIP Award
for 2023
Performance
RSU Award
Granted in 2023
Target PSU Award
Granted in 2023
Target Total
Direct
Compensation 
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor$  1,000,000$  1,000,000$  1,125,000$  1,125,000$  4,250,000 
Marcin Urbaszek$600,000$450,000$485,000$485,000$2,020,000 
Stephen Alpart$600,000$450,000$600,000$600,000$2,250,000 
Peter Morral$600,000$450,000$600,000$600,000$2,250,000 
Steven Plust$600,000$450,000$600,000$600,000$2,250,000 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS UNDER PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
As described in detail under “Executive Compensation Components – 2023 AIP Awards” below, our Company’s 2023 performance was between threshold and target levels for both the “Run-rate” ROAE and Change in Book Value per Share metrics and earned 57.4% of target levels for the awards’ financial component. Our Compensation Committee determined that the executive team achieved target-level performance with respect to the AIP’s strategic metrics in the context of very challenging macroeconomic and capital markets conditions. The 57.4% financial performance combined with 100% strategic performance meant that approximately 78.7% of the NEOs’ respective 2023 AIP target amounts were paid out.
The three-year performance period for the PSUs granted in 2021 concluded on December 31, 2023. The performance metrics for those awards were absolute and relative “Core” ROAE, and our results for 2021-2023 with respect to those metrics were below the awards’ threshold levels. Consequently, 0% of the target number of PSUs granted in 2021 were earned, and no shares were issued to the NEOs for these awards. See “Executive Compensation Components – 2021 PSU Award Earnout (2021-2023 Performance Period)” for more information.
QUALITY COMPENSATION PRACTICES
What We Do
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.gif]

A significant portion of each NEO’s compensation is at risk

We have adopted meaningful stock ownership requirements applicable to our NEOs

Our independent Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant who provides no other services to our Company

Performance-based cash and equity awards have a sliding scale earn-out structure that allows for 0% payouts and is capped at 200% of target amounts

Our performance-based equity awards use both absolute and relative performance metrics

Our Compensation Committee conducts an annual compensation risk assessment

We hold an annual Say on Pay vote
What We Don’t Do
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_dont-bw.gif]

Our NEOs do not receive perquisites or retirement plans not available to other employees

We do not allow our NEOs to hedge or pledge their Company stock

We do not have single-trigger accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change of control of our Company, and our equity plan does not use a liberal definition of “change of control”

Our equity plan does not use liberal share recycling

We do not pay dividends on any performance-based equity units that are not earned through satisfaction of the awards’ performance metrics

We do not provide tax gross-ups

Our NEOs’ employment agreements do not provide for excessive severance payments
38 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
How Executive Compensation Is Determined
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
Our compensation program philosophy is to provide an attractive, flexible and market-based total compensation program tied to performance and aligned with stockholders’ interests.
Our total rewards philosophy is designed to:
Attract, retain and incentivize the best talent to support our business objectives
Pay for performance by linking compensation to the achievement of short-term and long-term financial and strategic goals
Align the interests of our executive officers and stockholders by tying elements of executive compensation to corporate performance and generated returns
Ensure fair, equitable and competitive pay practices
Our Compensation Committee has instituted a comprehensive executive compensation program for our internally managed company designed to achieve these objectives through a mix of compensation components and sound governance practices.
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Role of the Compensation Committee
Our Board’s Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible for setting all compensation paid to our executive officers. Our Compensation Committee establishes the structure of the executive compensation program, the levels paid to each executive and the performance goals for incentive-based compensation. Our Compensation Committee also recommends to our Board the amount and structure of compensation to be paid to independent directors.
When making executive compensation decisions, our Compensation Committee considers the financial performance of our Company over the prior year, market data and the competitive landscape for talent, the performance and experience of each executive officer, internal pay equity within the executive officer group, alignment with stockholder interests and risk mitigation.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
Our Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC, or Semler Brossy, as its independent compensation consultant in 2019. Semler Brossy advises our Compensation Committee on market practices, peer group composition, executive compensation program design and executive pay levels. Semler Brossy also provides advice on setting compensation for independent directors.
Semler Brossy does not provide any other services to our Company. Following a review of the relationship between our Company and Semler Brossy during 2023, our Compensation Committee concluded that Semler Brossy’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest.
Role of Executive Officers
In consultation with Semler Brossy, our Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to our Compensation Committee regarding compensation for the other executive officers. Our Chief Financial Officer assists our Chief Executive Officer in advising our Compensation Committee on corporate performance matters and the nature and levels of performance metrics for incentive-based compensation. No executive officer participates in Compensation Committee discussions setting his own pay.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 39

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
In connection with the Internalization, we entered into employment agreements with each of the NEOs pursuant to which each became employed directly by the Company on December 31, 2020, the effective date of the Internalization. Our Compensation Committee negotiated the employment agreements, with the advice of Semler Brossy, and our Board of Directors approved them. The employment agreements established initial compensation amounts and much of the structure of the compensation components described below. The terms of these employment agreements are set forth in detail following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in this proxy statement.
PEER GROUP
Our Compensation Committee does not have a policy to set executive pay levels to a particular market benchmark, but it does review market data assembled by Semler Brossy for information about pay levels for the individual executive officers – both total compensation levels and levels of the various compensation components – as well as pay practices. This data is used to assess the reasonableness of our Company’s executive compensation program in the context of a competitive marketplace for talent.
As an internally managed commercial mortgage REIT, we face the following challenges when identifying peers for the purposes of comparing our executives’ compensation to that of other companies:

There are a limited number of internally managed commercial mortgage REITs, which makes it difficult to identify companies that are directly comparable to our Company;

REITs with a residential mortgage focus have different business strategies than those focused on commercial mortgages; and

REITs that are externally managed often do not disclose the cash compensation received by their executives, which is typically paid by their external managers. A comparison of our NEOs’ reported total compensation to the publicly disclosed total compensation paid to NEOs of externally managed companies may be misleading, because in the latter case base salary and annual incentive compensation paid by managers to NEOs of externally managed companies may not have been reported.
In the context of these comparative limitations, our Compensation Committee has worked with Semler Brossy to construct a peer group with the following characteristics:

All internally managed companies;

Primary focus is on commercial mortgage REITs, but can also include mortgage REITs with a mix of commercial and residential portfolios, as well as diversified REITs and companies in the commercial-focused real estate financial services or thrifts and mortgage finance industries; and

Are comparably sized, which is primarily evaluated based on book value of equity and assets, with consideration also given to market capitalization and revenue levels.
The peer group is reviewed annually and updated as necessary to reflect the companies that most closely fit the foregoing characteristics. The peer group used when 2023 compensation decisions were made consisted of the following companies:

Arbor Realty Trust Inc. (ABR)

Arlington Asset Investment Corp. (AAIC)

BrightSpire Capital, Inc. (BRSP)

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM)

Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX)

iStar Inc. (STAR)

Ladder Capital Corp (LADR)

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA)

New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. (NYMT)

Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT)

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD)
40 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
SAY ON PAY VOTE
At our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, we provided our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation program. Approximately 95% of the votes cast at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders approved our executive compensation as described in our proxy statement for that meeting. Our Compensation Committee carefully considers stockholder votes on this matter, along with other expressions of stockholder views on compensation that the committee receives.
Executive Compensation Components
The principal components of our executive compensation program for 2023 are as follows:

Base salary;

Annual Incentive Plan, or AIP, awards, which are cash awards granted under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and

Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, awards, which are equity awards granted under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan:

50% of the LTIP award value was granted as PSUs, and

50% of the LTIP award value was granted as RSUs.
Each of these components is described in detail below. This mix of compensation components was designed to incentivize, reward and retain the executive officers, consistent with our compensation philosophy and our Company’s long-term business goals. We also provide our NEOs the health and welfare and retirement benefits available to our other employees.
2023 BASE SALARY
The NEOs’ respective base salaries are intended to be at competitive levels and to reflect the NEOs’ experience and expertise. Base salary amounts for 2023 remained unchanged from 2022 amounts except that Mr. Urbaszek’s salary was increased from $560,000 in 2022 to $600,000 in 2023. This increase was primarily driven by internal pay equity considerations.
2023 AIP AWARDS
The AIP is designed to reward achievement of annual goals that support long-term value creation through the opportunity to earn cash payments. The awards described below were based on 2023 performance, were paid out in the first quarter of 2024, and are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
AIP awards are calculated as follows:
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_executive-pn.jpg]
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 41

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2023 AIP Award Values
Each NEO’s target AIP award value was set in his respective employment agreement as a percentage of his base salary as follows, with an opportunity to earn 0% to 200% of the target value:
Named Executive Officer2023
Base Salary
Target Award
Percentage
Minimum AIP
Payout for 2023
Performance
Target AIP Payout
for 2023
Performance
Maximum AIP
Payout for 2023
Performance
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor$  1,000,000100%$  0$  1,000,000$  2,000,000
Marcin Urbaszek$600,00075%$0$450,000$900,000
Stephen Alpart$600,00075%$0$450,000$900,000
Peter Morral$600,00075%$0$450,000$900,000
Steven Plust$600,00075%$0$450,000$900,000
Our Compensation Committee believes these award values appropriately reflect internal pay equity considerations, will motivate achievement of the performance goals described below and are competitive within the marketplace for talent, while the cap of 200% of target helps protect our Company against imprudent risk taking.
2023 AIP Award Structure – Measuring Corporate Performance
The percentage of each NEO’s target award value earned was dependent on achievement of a mix of strategic objectives and financial metrics portrayed below:
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_strategic-pn.jpg]
Our Compensation Committee assigned even weighting to the Strategic Component and Financial Component to recognize the value of both qualitative and quantitative measures of corporate performance and to incentivize a range of achievements relevant to our growing company’s long-term success. Detailed information about these performance goals and 2023 results follows.
42 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Strategic Component of 2023 AIP Awards – Goals and Results
Our Compensation Committee established specific assessment factors for each of the strategic objectives in the AIP awards for 2023, as follows:
ObjectivePercentage of
Strategic
Component
Summary of Assessment Factors
Balance sheet management30%

Create a diversified and stable funding profile

Maintain appropriate balance sheet leverage

Actively manage corporate liquidity and comply with financial covenants

Grow equity capital to achieve economies of scale, larger market presence and increasing liquidity for stockholders
Risk management30%

Use a comprehensive risk management framework to mitigate various risks, including credit risk, financing and liquidity risk, internal control and operational risk, and IT infrastructure and cybersecurity risk

Assess business counterparties
Stockholder/investor focus20%

Generate detailed, transparent and accurate public company disclosures

Engage equity and debt investors through a robust investor relations program

Attend various equity and fixed income industry conferences and execute marketing efforts
Enhancing franchise value20%

Enhance the Company’s brand and presence in the CRE market to further growth opportunities

Maintain a first-class team with highly skilled and experienced professionals with broad CRE lending relationships

Expand the Company’s reputation in the market as a fair and reliable business counterparty
The NEOs are evaluated collectively with respect to their performance against these objectives. To the extent that achievement of any of these qualitative metrics exceeded the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion under the AIP to apply an aggregate multiplier of between one and two based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric above target. To the extent that achievement of any of these qualitative metrics fell below the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion under the AIP to apply an aggregate multiplier of between zero and one based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric below target.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 43

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
At the conclusion of the one-year performance period, our Compensation Committee conducted a thorough assessment of our executive team’s performance against the factors set forth above. The committee considered the challenging macroeconomic and capital markets environment that adversely affected our Company and the CRE industry as a whole during 2023. The committee also weighed whether the objectives that will position our Company for long-term success had been achieved. The committee’s performance assessment for the 2023 AIP’s Strategic Component is summarized below:
2023 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC FACTORS
Balance Sheet Management
(30% of Strategic Component)

Proactively managed the balance sheet, realizing over $700 million of loan repayments, paydowns and resolutions

Prioritized maximizing liquidity – particularly in light of the convertible notes maturing in October 2023, the second such maturity in a year, and the capital markets volatility

Strategically refinanced our second de-levered CRE CLO (commercial real estate collateralized loan obligation) funding vehicle, releasing over $80 million of capital, during extremely challenging market conditions caused by the regional banking crisis

Extended the maturities of several of our bank financing facilities and amended certain terms, including two financial covenants, as our lenders continue to support our platform and seek to do more business with us

Increased the borrowings on one of our bank facilities, realizing $100 million of additional proceeds to give us additional resources to actively manage our balance sheet
Risk Management
(30% of Strategic Component)

Proactively managed liquidity and funding sources while maintaining an active dialogue with lending counterparties regarding portfolio performance

Successfully resolved three non-accrual loans and actively asset-managed the investment portfolio while collaboratively working with borrowers to help them navigate any disruptions at their properties due to market dislocations

Actively oversaw a fully dedicated team of professionals at our sub-servicer, who are focused exclusively on servicing and assisting in asset managing our loan portfolio

Further enhanced internal controls and operations processes to ensure accurate financial reporting that meets all regulatory requirements and maintained compliance with all reporting, listing, and REIT regulatory requirements

Maintained a sophisticated and secure IT infrastructure environment through our master service provider, and maintained cybersecurity insurance coverage
(continued)
44 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2023 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC FACTORS, cont’d
Stockholder/
Investor Focus
(20% of Strategic Component)

Engaged with many equity and fixed income investors through targeted outreach, holding one-on-one meetings, and attending six real estate lending industry and equity/fixed income investor conferences

Maintained a dialogue with our largest institutional investors focused on corporate governance topics and continued an active dialogue with our equity research analysts to help further expand their knowledge and understanding of our Company and business strategy

Continued to evolve our proxy disclosure, aimed at improving communication related to executive compensation and other governance topics

Further improved and expanded the financial disclosures in our quarterly SEC filings with the goal of providing a more informed view of the business

Continued to improve our corporate website with the goal of expanding the discussion of the business and highlighting ESG efforts and initiatives

Repurchased over 2 million shares of common stock at a meaningful discount to book value
Enhancing Franchise Value
(20% of Strategic Component)

Maintained our presence and franchise in the CRE lending markets through an active dialogue with industry participants, attending largest industry conferences and by sustaining positive borrower relationships by collaboratively working with them during a challenging market environment

Maintained and enhanced corporate culture focused on inclusion, teamwork, compliance and risk management, as evidenced by employee survey results

Maintained an active dialogue with our capital providers in the equity and fixed income markets with the goal of developing new and preserving existing relationships and channels to access capital to support future growth of the business

Maintained our highly capable team with no turnover, while employee survey results reflect high levels of satisfaction
Following this review, our Compensation Committee determined that the NEOs had achieved the objectives of the Strategic Component of the 2023 AIP awards at target levels of performance, or 100%.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 45

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Financial Component of 2023 AIP Awards – Goals and Results
The Financial Component of the 2023 AIP awards was split evenly between the performance metrics “Run-rate” ROAE and Change in Book Value per Share. We believe that those two metrics are the most significant drivers of market valuation in our industry, thus aligning the NEOs’ compensation to our stockholders’ interests.
“Run-rate” ROAE is calculated as the ratio of (i) our Company’s Distributable Earnings generated during the performance period, excluding realized losses or realized gains related to credit events, asset sales and similar developments within our Company’s portfolio or borrowings, to (ii) our Company’s average common stockholders’ equity during the performance period, as measured on each of the first and last day of the period. For these purposes, Distributable Earnings are as reported in our Company’s publicly filed financial reports, excluding the effects of certain non-cash items and one-time charges that we believe are not indicative of our Company’s overall operating performance.
Our AIP awards for 2021 and 2022 used “Core” ROAE, which is the ratio of Distributable Earnings to stockholders’ equity. We used Distributable Earnings in this calculation instead of GAAP earnings because Distributable Earnings is a better measure of a commercial mortgage REIT’s operating performance and is intended to over time serve as a general, though imperfect, proxy for our taxable income. As such, Distributable Earnings is considered a key indicator of our ability to generate sufficient income to pay our dividends, which is the primary focus of income-oriented investors who comprise a meaningful segment of our stockholder base.
Starting with the 2023 AIP awards, our Compensation Committee adjusted the ratio used in prior AIP awards by excluding realized losses and gains from Distributable Earnings. The resulting metric is “Run-rate” ROAE. Our Compensation Committee made this change from “Core” ROAE to “Run-rate” ROAE to reduce the effects of market volatility on the metric and portray results that the committee believes offer a stronger indication of management’s operating performance. For additional information, see the Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures.
Our Compensation Committee selected “Run-rate” ROAE as one of the two financial metrics to be used in the 2023 AIP awards because it is an important valuation metric for commercial mortgage REITs like our Company that reflects efficient use of investors’ capital and management’s sound investment decisions. “Run-rate” ROAE emphasizes the efficient generation of earnings from our Company’s equity capital that can be distributed to our Company’s stockholders as dividends, substantially reflects performance over time and encompasses all aspects of investment activities, including interest income received on loans net of borrowing costs, as well as realized gains and losses on investments, if any.
Change in Book Value per Share is calculated as the difference between (i) our Company’s total common stockholders’ equity divided by the number of common shares outstanding as measured on the first day of the performance period and (ii) our Company’s total common stockholders’ equity divided by the number of common shares outstanding as measured on the last day of the performance period. For additional information, see the Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures.
Our Compensation Committee added Change in Book Value per Share as a second metric to the AIP award structure in 2023 in part to diversify the program (which had used absolute and relative “Core” ROAE for the financial component of previous awards). Our Compensation Committee believed that such diversification of financial metrics would result in more balanced compensation incentives and reduce risk. Change in Book Value per Share was selected as the second metric because book value is linked to investor returns, it reflects the stability of our Company’s investment portfolio and effective balance sheet management, and it accounts for credit losses in a way that is less volatile than in an earnings-based metric.
46 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our Compensation Committee established the following payout matrix to determine achievement under the Financial Component of the 2023 AIP awards. The percentage earned is to be linearly interpolated when the level of performance is between threshold and target levels or between target and maximum levels.
[MISSING IMAGE: box_runrate-pn.gif]
Level of
Performance
“Run-rate”
ROAE
Percentage Earned
Below Threshold
<3.0%
0% of Target
Threshold3.0%25% of Target
Target6.0%100% of Target
Maximum
9.0%
200% of Target
Actual5.2%80.2% of Target
[MISSING IMAGE: box_change-pn.gif]
Level of
Performance
Change in Book Value
per Share
Percentage Earned
Below Threshold
<(15.0)%      
0% of Target
Threshold(15.0)%      25% of Target
Target0.0%       100% of Target
Maximum
15.0%       
200% of Target
Actual
(13.1)%
34.5% of Target
As indicated above, our Company’s actual “Run-rate” ROAE for 2023 was 5.2%; applying interpolation to the payout matrix yields a result of 80.2% of the target earned for that metric. Our 2023 “Run-rate” ROAE performance was challenged by a decline in our portfolio balance, an increased balance of nonaccrual loans and higher cost of funding. Our Company’s Change in Book Value per Share from 2022 to 2023 was (13.1%); applying interpolation to the payout matrix yields a result of 34.5% of the target earned for that metric. Increased provision for credit losses recorded during 2023, which were driven by the challenging real estate and capital markets conditions, put downward pressure on our book value per share. The total Financial Component of the 2023 AIP awards was achieved at 57.4% of target, as shown below:
Total Financial
Component
Results
“Run-Rate” ROAE
Percentage Earned

(50% weighting)
Change in Book Value
per Share
Percentage Earned

(50% weighting)
Total Percentage
Earned
80.2% of Target34.5% of Target57.4% of Target
2023 AIP Award Payouts
The 100% of target earned from the Strategic Component combined with the 57.4% of target earned from the Financial Component resulted in 2023 AIP payouts equal to approximately 78.7% of each NEO’s respective target award, as shown below:
2023 AIP
Award
Payouts
Strategic
Component
Percentage
Earned

(50% weighting)
Financial
Component
Percentage
Earned

(50% weighting)
Total Award
Percentage
Earned
100% of Target57.4% of Target78.7% of Target
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 47

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The dollar amounts paid to the NEOs for the 2023 AIP awards are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. The payouts were made in the first quarter of 2024.
LTIP AWARDS GRANTED IN 2023
In early 2023, our Compensation Committee granted the NEOs long-term incentive awards under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan to reward key drivers of stockholder value and foster a sense of ownership and commitment to our Company’s long-term success. The award values are as follows:
Named Executive OfficerRSU Award Grant
Date Value
PSU Award Grant
Date Value
Total 2023 LTIP Award
Grant Date Value
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor$  1,125,000$  1,125,000$  2,250,000
Marcin Urbaszek$485,000$485,000$970,000
Stephen Alpart$600,000$600,000$1,200,000
Peter Morral$600,000$600,000$1,200,000
Steven Plust$600,000$600,000$1,200,000
Factors influencing the size of each executive’s LTIP award include job responsibilities and performance, retention considerations, internal pay equity within the executive group, and market competitiveness. The grant date value of the NEOs’ 2023 LTIP awards remained unchanged from the grant date value of the 2022 grants.
The even split of the NEOs’ LTIP target value between performance-based and time-based awards is designed to motivate achievement of financial objectives while encouraging retention and stock ownership. The ultimate value of both the PSUs and the RSUs is dependent on our long-term success as reflected in the price of our Company’s common stock.
The treatment of the awards upon the NEO’s termination of employment in connection with death, disability, retirement or a change of control of our Company is described in detail in “Executive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” later in this proxy statement. The award agreements provide for “double trigger” vesting, meaning that vesting is not accelerated upon a change of control unless the change of control is accompanied by a qualifying termination of employment.
2023 RSU Awards
The RSUs granted to the NEOs in early 2023 vest ratably over a three-year period – 33% on each of March 15, 2024, and March 15, 2025, and 34% on March 15, 2026 – subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement. The RSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that, upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, pay out with respect to all outstanding RSUs.
2023 PSU Awards (2023-2025 Performance Period)
The PSU awards granted to the NEOs in early 2023 have a three-year performance period of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2025. All the PSUs that have been earned through satisfaction of the applicable performance metrics will vest at the conclusion of the performance period on a one-for-one basis of one share of common stock per PSU, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
The percentage of the target number of PSUs granted in 2023 that will be earned is dependent on our Company’s absolute and relative performance with respect to “Run-Rate” ROAE and Change in Book Value per Share during the three-year performance period, with each measure weighted at 25%. Actual units earned will be between 0% and 200% of target levels.
The significance and calculation of both “Run-Rate” ROAE and Change in Book Value per Share are described above under “2023 AIP Awards.” We believe that they are critical metrics for our Company and its
48 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
stockholders, and our Compensation Committee used them to measure corporate performance on both an annual and long-term basis to align pay and performance. For the PSU awards, the Committee included relative measures that are weighted evenly with the absolute measures to account for independent economic and real estate market forces over the three-year performance period while aligning the NEOs’ focus on execution of our Company’s long-term plan.
To measure relative “Run-Rate” ROAE and relative Change in Book Value per Share performance, our Company’s absolute result for each metric is compared to the respective results of a comparator group of companies that share the following characteristics:

All are mortgage REITs;

All have investment portfolios focused on commercial mortgages;

They constitute our Company’s primary public commercial mortgage REIT competitors for investment;

They have long-term capital and return profiles similar to our Company’s profiles; and

External market conditions generally affect them in ways similar to how our Company is affected.
The comparator group that will be used to measure relative results for the PSU awards granted in 2023 consists of the following companies:

ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.

Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp

Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

BrightSpire Capital, Inc.

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.

Ladder Capital Corp

TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
The performance goals for the PSUs granted in early 2023 are set forth below. The specific threshold, target and maximum values for absolute “Run-Rate” ROAE and absolute Change in Book Value per Share will not be publicly disclosed until the three-year performance period is completed due to the proprietary nature and competitive sensitivity of that information. The target values for these metrics are intended to be challenging but achievable.
There is a 0% earnout for performance below threshold levels, and earnouts for performance in excess of the maximum levels are capped at 200%; earnouts for performance between threshold and target levels or target and maximum levels will be calculated through linear interpolation.
Absolute “Run-Rate” ROAE (25%)Relative “Run-Rate” ROAE (25%)
PerformancePercentage EarnedPerformancePercentage Earned
Target value -2%25% of target (threshold)25th percentile25% of target (threshold)
Target value100% of target50th percentile100% of target
Target value +2%200% of target (maximum)75th percentile200% of target (maximum)
Absolute Change in Book Value per Share (25%)Relative Change in Book Value per Share (25%)
PerformancePercentage EarnedPerformancePercentage Earned
Target value -10.0%25% of target (threshold)25th percentile25% of target (threshold)
Target value100% of target50th percentile100% of target
Target value +10.0%200% of target (maximum)75th percentile200% of target (maximum)
The PSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that accrue during the performance period but are paid out upon vesting only with respect to shares that have been earned through satisfaction of the
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 49

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
performance metrics. Upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to all outstanding PSUs. No dividend equivalent rights are paid out with respect to shares not earned or PSUs that have terminated before vesting.
2021 PSU AWARD RESULTS (2021-2023 PERFORMANCE PERIOD)
The results for the PSUs granted in 2021 are shown below. They were calculated by comparing actual average corporate performance for each metric for the performance period of January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2023, against the performance goals established by our Compensation Committee near the beginning of the performance period.
The PSUs granted in 2021 differ from the ones granted in 2023, described above, in that the performance metrics were absolute and relative “Core” ROAE, weighted equally. “Core” ROAE is calculated as the ratio of (i) our Company’s Distributable Earnings generated during the performance period to (ii) our Company’s average common stockholders’ equity during the performance period, as measured on each of the first and last day of the period. For these purposes, Distributable Earnings are as reported in our Company’s publicly filed financial reports, excluding the effects of certain non-cash items and one-time charges that we believe are not indicative of our Company’s overall operating performance. For additional information, see the Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures. The comparator companies used to measure relative “Core” ROAE results are the same as those listed above with respect to the PSUs granted in 2023.
[MISSING IMAGE: box_absolute-pn.gif]
Level of
Performance
Absolute “Core”
ROAE
Percentage Earned
Below Threshold
<5.0%
0% of Target
Threshold5.0%25% of Target
Target6.5%100% of Target
Maximum
8.0%
200% of Target
Actual1.8%0% of Target
[MISSING IMAGE: box_relative-pn.gif]
Level of
Performance
Relative “Core” ROAEPercentage Earned
Below Threshold
<25th percentile      
0% of Target
Threshold
25th percentile      
25% of Target
Target
50th percentile      
100% of Target
Maximum
75th percentile      
200% of Target
Actual
13th percentile
0% of Target
PSU Awards Vested
(2021-2023 Performance
Period)
Absolute
“Core” ROAE

(50% weighting)
Relative
“Core” ROAE

(50% weighting)
Total Award
Percentage
Earned
0% of Target0% of Target0% of Target
As indicated above, the Company’s actual average “Core” ROAE for the three-year performance period that ended on December 31, 2023, was 1.8% (below the threshold level for the absolute measure), which was in the 13th percentile of the comparator companies’ results (below the threshold level for the relative measure). Consequently, 0% of the target number of PSUs granted in 2021 were earned, no shares were issued to the NEOs upon the awards’ settlement in early 2024, and no dividend equivalent rights were paid.
50 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
BENEFITS
Our NEOs receive the same benefits package available to our other employees, which consists primarily of health and wellness offerings, a 401(k) savings plan with a Company contribution and paid time off.
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Our Compensation Committee believes that ownership of our Company’s common stock by our executive officers directly aligns their interests with those of our other stockholders and helps balance the incentives for risk taking inherent in equity-based awards. Accordingly, our Compensation Committee has adopted the following stock ownership guidelines:
Executive OfficerMinimum Ownership Level
Chief Executive OfficerMarket value of stock held 5x base salary
Other executive officersMarket value of stock held 3x base salary
All outstanding shares and unvested RSUs are included in determining whether an executive officer satisfies the applicable minimum ownership level. Shares underlying unvested PSUs are not included. An executive officer is expected to attain the minimum ownership level within five years of appointment. If the minimum amount is not attained by such date – or is not maintained after such date – the officer is expected to retain at least 75% of the shares issued upon settlement of equity awards (net of shares withheld to satisfy tax obligations) until attaining the ownership level. Our Compensation Committee reviews executive stock ownership annually to confirm compliance with these ownership and retention requirements.
PROHIBITION AGAINST HEDGING AND PLEDGING
Our Board has adopted, as part of our Insider Trading Policy, prohibitions against our officers, directors and employees engaging in transactions designed to profit from fluctuations in the price of our securities, such as short sales or purchasing our securities on margin. In addition, such persons are prohibited from purchasing or selling puts or calls or other derivative securities on our securities, pledging our securities as collateral for a loan, or entering into hedging or monetization transactions or similar arrangements with respect to our securities.
CLAWBACK POLICY
In compliance with the NYSE listing standards issued in connection with the SEC rules promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or Dodd-Frank Act, our Compensation Committee adopted a Clawback Policy in October 2023 that supersedes the clawback provisions contained in our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan and 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Clawback Policy provides that upon a required accounting restatement, any incentive-based compensation received by current or former executive officers during the three years preceding the restatement that exceeded amounts owed based on the restated financials will be recovered by the Company.
COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT
Our Compensation Committee reviewed our Company’s compensation programs and plans for both executive officers and other employees in early 2024 to assess whether those programs and plans create incentives for risk-taking behavior that could damage our Company and its stockholders. Following this assessment, our
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 51

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Committee concluded that the risks arising from our Company’s compensation programs and plans for executive officers and other employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.
When making this determination, our Compensation Committee specifically considered the following features of our executive compensation program:
Risk-Mitigating Features of Executive Compensation Program
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_do-pn.gif]

Earnout of performance-based equity (PSU) and annual cash (AIP) awards is capped at 200% of target

Performance-based awards have a sliding scale earnout structure, not an all-or-nothing structure

A significant percentage of the executives’ total direct compensation is paid as equity with three-year vesting

PSUs have a three-year performance period

All officers and employees are prohibited from hedging Company securities through our Insider Trading Policy

Executive stock ownership levels and retention requirements are governed by stock ownership guidelines

Diversification of performance metrics that determine results under incentive-based awards reduces potential risk of focus on one financial measure

Our clawback policy requires recoupment of excess cash or equity paid pursuant to incentive-based awards upon a financial restatement
52 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Committee Report
Compensation Committee Report
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management.
Based on such review and discussions, our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board:
Hope B. Woodhouse (Chair)
Tanuja M. Dehne
W. Reid Sanders
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 53

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the cash and equity compensation awarded to or earned by our NEOs for services rendered to us during the fiscal years presented:
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($)
Stock
Awards
(1)
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(2)
($)
All Other
Compensation
(3)
($)
Total
($)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor
President and Chief Executive Officer
20231,000,0002,249,997786,92312,9004,049,820
20221,000,0002,249,979500,00012,1503,762,129
20211,000,0002,718,4541,000,00011,7004,730,154
Marcin Urbaszek
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
2023600,000969,998354,11512,9001,937,013
2022560,000969,980210,00012,1501,752,130
2021560,000809,487420,00011,7001,801,187
Stephen Alpart
Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
2023600,0001,199,994354,11512,9002,167,009
2022600,0001,199,984225,00012,1502,037,134
2021600,0001,449,848450,00011,7002,511,548
Peter Morral
Vice President and Chief Development Officer
2023600,0001,199,994354,1159,9002,164,009
2022600,0001,199,984225,0009,1502,034,134
2021600,0001,449,848450,0008,7002,508,548
Steven Plust
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
2023600,0001,199,994354,11512,9002,167,009
2022600,0001,199,984225,00012,1502,037,134
2021600,0001,449,848450,00011,7002,511,548
(1)
The amounts in this column are calculated based on the number of RSUs and PSUs awarded and the fair market value of our common stock on the date the award was made in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K for assumptions used to calculate our stock awards.
The 2023 amounts in this table reflect the fair market value of each NEO’s RSUs plus the target payout for the PSUs on the grant date. As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the actual number of PSUs earned will be determined after a three-year performance period beginning on January 1, 2023, and ending on December 31, 2025. Depending on our Company’s performance during this time with respect to the awards’ metrics, 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted to the NEOs can be earned. The grant date fair value of RSUs plus the grant date fair value of the PSUs assuming maximum potential payout amounts (200% of target) are as follows: (a) Mr. Taylor, $3,374,996; (b) Mr. Urbaszek, $1,454,998; (c) Mr. Alpart, $1,799,991; (d) Mr. Morral, $1,799,991; and (e) Mr. Plust, $1,799,991. Conversely, the grant date fair value of RSUs plus the grant date fair value of the PSUs assuming minimum potential payouts (0% of target) are as follows: (a) Mr. Taylor, $1,124,999; (b) Mr. Urbaszek, $484,999; (c) Mr. Alpart, $599,997; (d) Mr. Morral, $599,997; and (e) Mr. Plust, $599,997.
(2)
The amounts in this column for 2023 represent payments made to the NEOs for their AIP awards in early 2024 based on performance during 2023. The AIP awards are described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
(3)
The amounts in this column for 2023 represent Company contributions into each NEO’s 401(k) savings plan for 2023 service and, for NEOs other than Mr. Morral, Company contributions into their Health Savings Account during 2023.
54 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2023
The following table shows the cash incentive awards and equity awards made under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan to our NEOs during 2023.
NameAward
Type
Grant
Date
Date of
Committee
Action
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(3)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(5)
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
(6)
($)
Threshold
($)
(2)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
(4)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
John (“Jack”) A.
Taylor
AIP125,0001,000,0002,000,000
PSU3/15/20233/8/202355,804223,214446,4281,124,999
RSU3/15/20233/8/2023223,2141,124,999
Marcin UrbaszekAIP56,250450,000900,000
PSU3/15/20233/8/202324,05896,230192,460484,999
RSU3/15/20233/8/202396,230484,999
Stephen AlpartAIP56,250450,000900,000
PSU3/15/20233/8/202329,762119,047238,094599,997
RSU3/15/20233/8/2023119,047599,997
Peter MorralAIP56,250450,000900,000
PSU3/15/20233/8/202329,762119,047238,094599,997
RSU3/15/20233/8/2023119,047599,997
Steven PlustAIP56,250450,000900,000
PSU3/15/20233/8/202329,762119,047238,094599,997
RSU3/15/20233/8/2023119,047599,997
(1)
These columns show the potential payments for each of the NEOs under their AIP award for 2023 performance. Actual payment amounts are determined in accordance with the performance metrics and calculation formula described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The amounts paid to the NEOs in early 2024 for 2023 performance are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)
As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” 50% of the AIP was subject to financial (quantitative) metrics – “Run-rate” ROAE and Change in Book Value per Share – which have threshold performance levels, and 50% was subject to strategic (qualitative) metrics, which do not have threshold performance levels. To the extent that achievement of any of the qualitative metrics exceeded the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion to apply an aggregate multiplier of between one and two based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric above target. To the extent that achievement of any of the qualitative metrics fell below the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion to apply an aggregate multiplier of between zero and one based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric below target. The amounts in this column reflect threshold performance for each of the quantitative metrics and a determination of zero with respect to the qualitative metrics. Performance below the threshold levels for the quantitative metrics, when paired with a determination of zero with respect to the qualitative metrics, would yield a payout of $0.
(3)
These columns show the potential number of PSUs that could be earned by each of the NEOs during the three-year performance period of January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2025. As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted to the NEOs can be earned depending on our Company’s performance during this period with respect to the awards’ metrics.
Any PSUs earned during the performance period will vest at the conclusion of the performance period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 55

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
respective award agreement. The PSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that accrue during the performance period but are paid out upon vesting only with respect to shares that have been earned through satisfaction of the performance metrics. Upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to all outstanding PSUs. No dividend equivalent rights are paid out with respect to shares not earned or PSUs that have been forfeited before vesting.
(4)
The amounts in this column reflect performance equal to threshold levels with respect to absolute and relative “Run-rate” ROAE and absolute and relative Change in Book Value per Shares. Performance below those levels would yield an earnout of zero PSUs.
(5)
The RSUs reflected in this column vest ratably over a three-year period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement. The RSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that, upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, pay out with respect to all outstanding RSUs.
(6)
The values in this column were calculated by multiplying the number of units granted (in the case of PSUs, the target number was used) by the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the grant date.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
In connection with the Internalization, we entered into employment agreements with each of the NEOs pursuant to which each became employed directly by the Company on December 31, 2020, the effective date of the Internalization. The employment agreements established the following compensation terms applicable to 2021 and subsequent years.
Base Salary
Base salaries for the NEOs were initially set under the employment agreements as $1,000,000 for Mr. Taylor; $560,000 for Mr. Urbaszek; and $600,000 for each of Messrs. Alpart, Morral and Plust for 2021. These salary amounts are to be reviewed at least annually and may be increased.
Annual Incentive Cash Payments
Under their employment agreements, the NEOs are entitled to the opportunity to earn an annual incentive cash payment with a target value equal to 100% of base salary for Mr. Taylor and 75% of base salary for the other NEOs. The agreements set the payout value as 0% to 200% of target amount, depending on achievement against performance goals established by our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee establishes performance goals each year.
LTIP Awards
The employment agreements with our NEOs provide that the NEOs are entitled to annual LTIP awards with an initial grant date value of $2,250,000 for Mr. Taylor; $670,000 for Mr. Urbaszek; and $1,200,000 for each of Messrs. Alpart, Morral and Plust. The annual LTIP awards are to be granted (i) partially in a performance-based award to be earned at 0% to 200% of target amount, depending on achievement over a three-year period against performance metrics established by our Compensation Committee, and (ii) partially in a time-based award that vest ratably over three years. The total value of the LTIP awards granted in subsequent years may vary, as may the proportion of performance-based and time-based grants (initially set as 50%/50%). The awards have associated dividend equivalent rights, are subject to the NEO’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date, and may be settled in shares or cash, at our Company’s option.
Other Terms
The employment agreements also provide that the NEOs are eligible to participate in all employee benefit programs made available to the Company’s employees generally from time to time and to receive payments
56 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
upon termination or change in control of the Company as described in detail in “Executive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” later in this proxy statement.
Each employment agreement also contains covenants relating to the treatment of confidential information and intellectual property matters and restrictions on the ability of each of the NEOs on the one hand and our Company on the other hand to disparage the other. In addition, the employment agreements provide that the NEO shall not, without the prior written consent of our Chief Executive Officer (or our Board, in the case of Mr. Taylor), (i) for a period of one year for Mr. Taylor, nine months for Messrs. Alpart and Plust and six months for Messrs. Morral and Urbaszek following the termination of the NEO’s employment relationship with our Company for any reason, engage in certain competitive activities and (ii) for a period of one year following the termination of the NEO’s employment relationship with our Company for any reason, solicit certain current or former employees or customers of our Company.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 57

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2023 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning unvested RSU and PSU awards held by each of the NEOs as of December 31, 2023.
Stock Awards
NameGrant DateNumber of Shares or
Units of Stock that
Have Not Vested
(#)
Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock that Have Not
Vested
(1)
($)
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number
of Unearned Units
That Have Not
Vested
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
Value or Payout
Value of Unearned
Units That Have Not
Vested
(1)
($)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor3/15/2023223,214(2)1,325,891
3/15/2023223,214(3)1,325,891
2/16/202223,754(4)141,099
2/16/202263,344(3)376,263
1/29/202128,153(5)167,229
1/29/202137,538(6)222,976
12/31/2020100,100(7)594,594
Marcin Urbaszek3/15/202396,230(2)571,606
3/15/202396,230(3)571,606
2/16/202210,241(4)60,829
2/16/202227,308(3)162,210
1/29/20218,383(5)49,797
1/29/202111,178(6)66,397
12/31/202056,056(7)332,973
Stephen Alpart3/15/2023119,047(2)707,139
3/15/2023119,047(3)707,139
2/16/202212,669(4)75,252
2/16/202233,784(3)200,677
1/29/202115,015(5)89,189
1/29/202120,020(6)118,919
12/31/202060,060(7)356,756
Peter Morral3/15/2023119,047(2)707,139
3/15/2023119,047(3)707,139
2/16/202212,669(4)75,252
2/16/202233,784(3)200,677
1/29/202115,015(5)89,189
1/29/202120,020(6)118,919
12/31/202060,060(7)356,756
Steven Plust3/15/2023119,047(2)707,139
3/15/2023119,047(3)707,139
2/16/202212,669(4)75,252
2/16/202233,784(3)200,677
1/29/202115,015(5)89,189
1/29/202120,020(6)118,919
12/31/202060,060(7)356,756
58 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
(1)
The values in this column are based on the $5.94 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of the fiscal year.
(2)
The number of PSUs listed is the target number that can be earned during the three-year performance period of January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2025. The actual number of PSUs earned will be 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted, depending on our Company’s performance during the performance period with respect to the awards’ metrics. Any PSUs earned during the performance period will vest at the conclusion of the performance period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement, and will be settled through issuance of shares in early 2026.
(3)
These RSUs vest at the rate of 33% on each of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date and 34% on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
(4)
The number of PSUs listed is the threshold number that can be earned during the three-year performance period of January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024. The actual number of PSUs earned will be 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted, depending on our Company’s performance during the performance period with respect to the awards’ metrics. Any PSUs earned during the performance period will vest at the conclusion of the performance period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement, and will be settled through issuance of shares in early 2025.
(5)
The number of PSUs listed is the threshold number that could have been earned during the three-year performance period of January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023. Following conclusion of the performance period, it was determined that 0% of these PSUs were earned in accordance with the awards’ metrics, and no shares were issued upon the award’s settlement in early 2024.
(6)
These RSUs vest at the rate of 33% on January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023, and 34% on January 1, 2024, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
(7)
These RSUs will vest on the fifth anniversary of the grant date, or December 31, 2025, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 59

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Stock Vested in 2023
The following table sets forth information concerning the shares of restricted stock and RSUs held by our NEOs that vested during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized
on Vesting
(1)
($)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor90,866533,636
Marcin Urbaszek29,344172,353
Stephen Alpart50,446297,304
Peter Morral52,251308,856
Steven Plust50,446297,304
(1)
The values in this column are based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the applicable vesting date or, if the NYSE was closed on such date, the closing market price of our common stock on the most recent NYSE trading date prior to the vesting date.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Although certain equity awards granted to the NEOs have features that could be deemed subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, we do not currently maintain a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides for deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified for the NEOs.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Our NEOs’ employment agreements provide for payment of various compensation and benefits to our NEOs upon certain types of termination of employment, including the following:
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control) – if, at any time other than during the three-month period immediately prior to (or otherwise in connection with or in anticipation of) a Change of Control (as defined below) or during the twenty-four (24) month period immediately following a Change of Control, or a Change-in-Control Period, (i) we terminate the employment of an NEO involuntarily without Cause (as defined below) or because of death or disability or (ii) an NEO resigns for Good Reason (as defined below), the NEO will generally be entitled to the following:

All accrued and unpaid base salary and benefits;

Severance payments equal to 2.0 times for Mr. Taylor, 1.5 times for Messrs. Alpart and Plust and 1.0 times for Messrs. Morral and Urbaszek the sum of the NEO’s then-applicable base salary and target cash bonus, if any, payable in equal installments over twelve months;

To the extent not yet paid, if applicable and earned based on actual performance, the NEO’s prior year’s cash bonus, payable at the same time the prior year’s cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers;

(3)


A cash bonus equal to the cash bonus that the NEO would have received for the fiscal year, if any, based on actual performance and prorated for the number of days the NEO was employed by us during that fiscal year, payable at the same time cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers for that fiscal year;

Reimbursement for Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, or COBRA, premiums for the NEO and such executive officer’s eligible dependents for up to eighteen (18) months;
60 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation

Unvested time-based equity awards will continue to vest as if the NEO had remained employed by us through the applicable vesting date; and

Unvested performance-based equity awards will be prorated for the number of days in the applicable performance period and vest at the end of the applicable performance period based on actual performance.
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (related to a Change of Control) – if, during a Change-in-Control Period, (i) we terminate the employment of an NEO involuntarily without Cause (as defined below) or because of death or disability or (ii) an NEO resigns for Good Reason (as defined below), the NEO will generally be entitled to the following:

All accrued and unpaid base salary and benefits;

Severance payments equal to 2.5 times for Mr. Taylor, 2.0 times for Messrs. Alpart and Plust and 1.5 times for Messrs. Morral and Urbaszek the sum of the NEO’s then-applicable base salary and target cash bonus, if any, payable in a lump sum on the Release Deadline (as defined below);

To holdthe extent not yet paid, if applicable and earned based on actual performance, the NEO’s prior year’s cash bonus, payable at the same time the prior year’s cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers;

A cash bonus equal to the NEO’s target cash bonus and prorated for the number of days such executive officer was employed by us during that fiscal year, payable within ten (10) days after the Release Deadline (as defined below);

Reimbursement for COBRA premiums for the NEO and such executive officer’s eligible dependents for up to eighteen (18) months;

Unvested time-based equity awards will immediately vest upon the NEO’s termination of employment; provided, however, in limited circumstances, to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of certain taxes, such awards will continue to vest as if such executive officer had remained employed by us through the applicable vesting date; and

Unvested performance-based equity awards will immediately vest at the target amount upon the NEO’s termination of employment; provided, however, in limited circumstances, if necessary to avoid certain adverse tax consequences, settlement of the awards will occur at the end of the applicable performance period.
Termination upon Death, Disability or Retirement – if an NEO’s employment terminates because of such executive officer’s (i) death, (ii) disability or (iii) Retirement, which is defined by the employment agreements as the executive officer’s resignation (other than for Good Reason) after the age of 65 with five years of service with the Company, inclusive of service with our Former Manager, such executive officer will generally be entitled to the following:

All accrued and unpaid base salary and benefits;

To the extent not yet paid, if applicable and earned based on actual performance, the NEO’s prior year’s cash bonus, payable at the same time the prior year’s cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers;

A cash bonus equal to the NEO’s target cash bonus and prorated for the number of days such executive officer was employed by us during that fiscal year, payable within ten days after the Release Deadline (as defined below);

For termination because of disability only, reimbursement for COBRA premiums for the NEO and such executive officer’s eligible dependents for up to eighteen (18) months; and

Unvested equity awards will receive the same treatment that unvested equity awards do for terminations without Cause or resignations for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control), as described above; provided, however, if the termination is the result of the NEO’s retirement during a Change-in-Control Period, unvested equity awards will receive the same treatment that unvested equity awards do for terminations without Cause or resignations for Good Reason (related to a Change of Control), as described above, except that the number of performance-based equity awards vesting
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 61

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
will be prorated based on the number of days such executive officer was employed by us during the applicable performance period.
Each NEO’s receipt of severance payments and other post-termination benefits is subject to, among other conditions, such executive officer executing a separation agreement and release of claims that is effective no later than sixty (60) days following the termination of such executive officer’s employment, or the Release Deadline, and such executive officer’s continued compliance with the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions contained in such executive officer’s Employment Agreement. For more information regarding the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions in our NEOs’ employment agreements, please see “Executive Compensation – Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2023 – Employment Agreements” above.
As used in our NEOs’ employment agreements:

“Cause” generally includes an NEO’s: (i) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties and responsibilities to our Company; (ii) commission of any act of fraud, theft, embezzlement or any other willful misconduct that injures our Company; (iii) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, any felony or a lesser crime involving moral turpitude; (iv) willful violation of any material written policy of our Company; (v) alcohol abuse or other substance abuse that materially impairs his ability to perform his obligations; (vi) unauthorized and willful use or disclosure of any proprietary information or trade secrets of our Company or other parties; and (vii) material and willful breach of any restrictive covenants to our Company;

“Change of Control” has the same definition as is given to such term in our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, provided that a management-led buyout is not considered a Change of Control; and

“Good Reason” with respect to an NEO generally includes: (i) a change in such executive officer’s title or reporting relationship or a material reduction in such executive officer’s duties, authority or responsibilities; (ii) a reduction in such executive officer’s base salary or target cash bonus of 10% or more; (iii) a material change in the geographic location of such executive officer’s primary work location; and (iv) a material breach by our Company of a material provision of such executive officer’s employment agreement.
62 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth estimates of the potential benefits to our NEOs in connection with certain termination and change in control events, assuming such events occurred on December 31, 2023. The actual payments due upon the occurrence of such events could materially differ from the estimates provided in the table if such events occur on a different date.
Name and
Form of Benefit
Termination without
Cause or Resignation for
Good Reason (not
related to a Change of
Control)
($)
Termination without
Cause or Resignation for
Good Reason (related to
a Change of Control)
($)
Death
($)
Disability
($)
Retirement(1)
($)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor
Severance4,000,0005,000,000
Cash Bonus(2)
786,9231,000,0001,000,0001,000,0001,000,000
Equity4,004,328(3)5,078,926(4)4,004,328(3)4,004,328(3)4,004,328(3)
Other Benefits65,703(5)65,703(5)65,703(5)
Totals8,856,95411,144,6295,004,3285,070,0315,004,328
Marcin Urbaszek
Severance1,050,0001,575,000
Cash Bonus(2)
354,115450,000450,000450,000450,000
Equity1,684,022(3)2,147,292(4)1,684,022(3)1,684,022(3)1,684,022(3)
Other Benefits65,703(5)65,703(5)65,703(5)
Totals3,153,8404,237,9952,134,0222,199,7252,134,022
Stephen Alpart
Severance1,575,0002,100,000
Cash Bonus(2)
354,115450,000450,000450,000450,000
Equity2,175,280(3)2,748,396(4)2,175,280(3)2,175,280(3)2,175,280(3)
Other Benefits46,054(5)46,054(5)46,054(5)
Totals4,150,4495,344,4502,625,2802,671,3342,625,280
Peter Morral
Severance1,050,0001,575,000
Cash Bonus(2)
354,115450,000450,000450,000450,000
Equity2,175,280(3)2,748,396(4)2,175,280(3)2,175,280(3)2,175,280(3)
Other Benefits82,392(5)82,392(5)82,392(5)
Totals3,661,7874,855,7882,625,2802,707,6722,625,280
Steven Plust
Severance1,575,0002,100,000
Cash Bonus(2)
354,115450,000450,000450,000450,000
Equity2,175,280(3)2,748,396(4)2,175,280(3)2,175,280(3)2,175,280(3)
Other Benefits39,478(5)39,478(5)39,478(5)
Totals4,143,8735,337,8742,625,2802,664,7582,625,280
(1)
As of December 31, 2023, Messrs. Taylor and Plust were the only NEOs who were Retirement eligible, but we have reflected the amounts that would have been paid upon Retirement on December 31, 2023, had all NEOs been so eligible.
(2)
Cash bonus amounts reflect pro-rated AIP payments for actual 2023 performance for a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control), and pro-rated AIP payments for target performance for a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason related to a Change of Control, death, disability or Retirement.
(3)
While settlement of outstanding equity awards is not accelerated upon a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control), death, disability or Retirement, outstanding equity awards would not be forfeited but would instead continue to vest without regard to continued service and settle on the original schedule. Therefore, the value of such awards has been included in this table for such events. Outstanding RSUs would continue to vest as though the NEO had
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 63

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
remained employed through the applicable vesting period, and outstanding PSUs would be prorated for the NEO’s partial service during the performance period. In these circumstances, the PSUs would vest at the end of the performance period at levels reflecting actual performance. For purposes of this table, the value of the outstanding PSU awards is reflected at target levels of performance. The value for all awards is based on the $5.94 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of the fiscal year.
(4)
Comprised of outstanding RSUs and PSUs held by the NEO as of December 31, 2023, which would have vested in full upon a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (related to a Change of Control), without proration for partial service. The PSUs would vest at target levels in this circumstance. The value for all awards is based on the $5.94 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of the fiscal year.
(5)
Assumes reimbursement of COBRA premiums for eighteen (18) months after the termination of the NEO’s employment.
64 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Pay Versus Performance
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship between “compensation actually paid” to our executive officers and certain corporate performance metrics, in accordance with SEC regulations, during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. Please note that the compensation information presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table below is different from the compensation information presented in the Summary Compensation Table largely due to the different methodologies applied to calculate equity award information.
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
(1)
($)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
(2)
($)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
(3)
($)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs
(4)
($)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
Net Income
(Loss) (in
thousands)
(7)
($)
“Run-
rate”
ROAE
(8)
Total
Shareholder
Return
(5)
($)
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
(6)
($)
20234,049,8204,599,5512,108,7602,403,2214979(63,198)5.2%
20223,762,129219,8871,965,133170,8323869(40,825)5.0%
20214,730,1545,205,8642,333,2082,602,997749168,3537.0%
20203,199,9951,921,6171,682,4911,116,4625878(40,439)8.4%
(1)
Summary Compensation Table Total for Principal Executive Officer, or PEO – The amounts in this column are the amounts of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer, for the covered years. Any cash compensation paid to Mr. Taylor by our Former Manager during 2020 is not included in the reported amount.
(2)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO – The amounts in the following table represent deductions from and additions to the equity award values for Mr. Taylor for the purposes of computing compensation actually paid appearing in this column of the Pay Versus Performance Table for 2023:
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
($)
-
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted
During the
Year
(a)
($)
+
Year-End
Fair Value of
Outstanding
Equity
Awards
Granted
During the
Year
(a)
($)
+/-
Change in Fair
Value as of
Year-End of
Any Prior Year
Equity Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End
(a)(b)
($)
+/-
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date of
Equity Awards
Granted in
Prior Years that
Vested During
the Year
(a)
($)
+
Value of
Dividends and
Dividend
Equivalent
Rights Paid on
Unvested
Equity Awards
During the
Year
(c)
($)
=Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
($)
4,049,820(2,249,997)2,651,782(211,535)46,594312,8874,599,551
(a)
Equity fair value calculations reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table were made using the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the relevant date (or, if the NYSE was closed on such date, the closing market price of our common stock on the most recent NYSE trading date prior to the relevant date).
(b)
Performance estimates were updated for outstanding PSUs granted in 2022 and 2023, and actual performance results were used for the PSUs granted in 2021 (as reported in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”).
(c)
Represents dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards and dividend equivalent rights paid with respect to unvested RSUs during the covered fiscal year.
(3)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs – The amounts in this column are the average amounts of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 65

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
for our NEOs other than Mr. Taylor for the covered years. For all covered years, our NEOs other than Mr. Taylor were Messrs. Urbaszek, Alpart, Morral and Plust. Any cash compensation paid to our NEOs by our Former Manager during 2020 is not included in the reported amount.
(4)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs – The amounts in the following table represent deductions from and additions to the equity award values for our NEOs other than Mr. Taylor for the purposes of computing average amounts of compensation actually paid appearing in this column of the Pay Versus Performance Table for 2023:
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted
During the
Year
(a)
($)
+
Average Year-
End Fair
Value of
Outstanding
Equity
Awards
Granted
During the
Year
(a)
($)
+/-
Average
Change in Fair
Value as of
Year-End of
Any Prior Year
Equity Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End
(a)(b)
($)
+/-
Average
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date of
Equity Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested
During the
Year
(a)
($)
+
Average Value of
Dividends and
Dividend
Equivalent
Rights Paid on
Unvested Equity
Awards During
the Year
(c)
($)
=Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
2,108,760(1,142,495)1,346,512(98,335)24,422164,3572,403,221
(a)
Equity fair value calculations reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table were made using the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the relevant date (or, if the NYSE was closed on such date, the closing market price of our common stock on the most recent NYSE trading date prior to the relevant date).
(b)
Performance estimates were updated for outstanding PSUs granted in 2022 and 2023, and actual performance results were used for the PSUs granted in 2021 (as reported in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”).
(c)
Represents dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards and dividend equivalent rights paid with respect to unvested RSUs during the covered fiscal year.
(5)
Total Shareholder Return (TSR) – The amounts in this column represent cumulative total return on our Company’s common stock at the end of each covered year, assuming $100 invested on December 31, 2019, with quarterly investment of dividends before consideration of income taxes and without the payment of any commissions.
(6)
Peer Group TSR – The amounts in this column represent cumulative total return on the stocks included in the Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index (which is the index we reference in the “Performance Graph” appearing in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K) at the end of each covered year, assuming $100 invested on December 31, 2019, with quarterly investment of dividends before consideration of income taxes and without the payment of any commissions.
(7)
Net Income (Loss) – The amounts in this column reflect the amount of net income (loss) reported in our Company’s audited financial statements for the covered years.
(8)
Run-rate” ROAE – The amounts in this column represent “Run-rate” ROAE for the covered years, which is calculated as the ratio of (i) our Company’s Distributable Earnings generated during the performance period, excluding realized losses or realized gains related to credit events, asset sales and similar developments within our Company’s portfolio or borrowings, to (ii) our Company’s average common stockholders’ equity during the performance period, as measured on each of the first and last day of the period. For these purposes, Distributable Earnings are as reported in our Company’s publicly filed financial reports, excluding the effects of certain non-cash items and one-time charges that we believe are not indicative of our Company’s overall operating performance. For additional information, see the Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures.
66 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
ANALYSIS OF THE PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
We are providing the following information depicting the relationship among items reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. Note that any cash compensation paid to our NEOs by our Former Manager during 2020 is not included in the amounts of Compensation Actually Paid reflected in the graphs below. Please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information about our Compensation Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy and the ways in which the committee structures our NEOs’ compensation opportunities to align with corporate performance.
[MISSING IMAGE: lc_netincome-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: lc_totalshareholder-pn.jpg]
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 67

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
[MISSING IMAGE: lc_runrate-pn.jpg]
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The following measures were the most important financial performance measures used by our Company during the most recently completed fiscal year to link (i) compensation actually paid to our NEOs to (ii) corporate performance:

Absolute “Run-rate” ROAE

Absolute Change in Book Value per Share

Relative “Run-rate” ROAE

Relative Change in Book Value per Share
Please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for detailed information about the role of these performance metrics in our 2023 executive compensation program.
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship between the annual total compensation of our median employee and the annual total compensation of our CEO.
As of December 31, 2023, we had 35 employees, all of whom were located in the United States and working for our Company full time. To identify the median employee, we calculated all employees’ total 2023 compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table. The median employee identified for this disclosure received 2023 compensation at the median point of the 2023 compensation received by all non-CEO employees.
Our median employee’s annual total compensation was $336,290 in 2023, and our CEO’s annual total compensation was $4,049,820 in 2023. These amounts were calculated in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table. The ratio of these amounts is 1:12.0.
The ratio stated above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the applicable SEC regulations under Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K and is not necessarily comparable to the ratios reported by other companies.
68 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 2: Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation
Proposal 2: Advisory Approval of
Executive Compensation
The SEC adopted rules pursuant to Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act that require public companies to provide stockholders with periodic advisory votes on executive compensation, also referred to as “Say on Pay.”
We are asking you to vote FOR the adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLVED: That the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers of the Company, as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and the related disclosure contained in the proxy statement.
For more information regarding our executive compensation program, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections above.
Because this Say on Pay vote is advisory in nature, it is not binding on us, our Board or our Compensation Committee. However, our Board values our stockholders’ opinion, and our Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of this vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
Our Company has been holding an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis. We currently expect to conduct the next advisory vote on executive compensation at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2025, but we will reconsider those plans if the voting results of Proposal 3 of this proxy statement indicate that our stockholders prefer a Say on Pay frequency of every two or three years.
Voting Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos2-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this advisory Say on Pay proposal. Our executive compensation program is designed to reward performance and align with stockholders’ interests.

FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 69

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 3: Advisory Approval of Frequency of Say on Pay Votes
Proposal 3: Advisory Approval of
Frequency of Say on Pay Votes
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and related SEC rules, we are providing our stockholders with an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes relatingon executive compensation, such as that provided for in Proposal 2 of this proxy statement. Under this proposal, stockholders may vote to have the Company hold an advisory vote on executive compensation (i) every year, (ii) every two years, or (iii) every three years. The option that receives the highest number of votes cast will be considered our stockholders’ preference with respect to the compensationfrequency of Say on Pay votes.
Our stockholders voted on a similar proposal in 2018, with the majority voting to hold Say on Pay votes every year. We have conducted an annual Say on Pay vote since that time. Our Board continues to believe that a Say on Pay vote should be conducted EVERY YEAR so that our stockholders can express their views on our executive officers;

(4)Tocompensation program and our Compensation Committee can consider the outcome of these votes when making its decisions on executive compensation.

Because this Say on Pay frequency vote is advisory in nature, it is not binding on us, our Board or our Compensation Committee. However, our Board values our stockholders’ opinion, and our Board will take into account the outcome of this vote when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on our executive compensation program. The next Say on Pay frequency vote is expected to occur at our 2030 annual meeting of stockholders.
Voting Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos3-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY APPROVAL OF
FREQUENCY OF SAY ON PAY VOTES
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote on an advisory basis to hold a Say on Pay vote EVERY YEAR.

EVERY YEAR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
70 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 4: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
Proposal 4: Ratification of Appointment
of Independent Auditor
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018; and

(5)To transact2024. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, our Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice.

In the event stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by our Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such other business as may properly come beforea change would be in the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Record Date:You may vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a holder of recordbest interests of our common stock asCompany. A representative of the close of business on March 21, 2018.

Proxy Materials:On or about March 27, 2018, we expectErnst & Young LLP is expected to begin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains information regarding how to access our proxy materials and vote. Our Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Admission Policy:Only holders of record of common stock as of the record date may attend the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to register to attend in advance of the Annual Meeting by contacting our Investor Relations department by phone at 212-364-3200 or by email at investors@gpmortgagetrust.com. Attendancebe present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and is expected to be limitedavailable to stockholders presenting valid government-issued photo identificationrespond to appropriate questions.

Audit and proofNon-Audit Fees
We retained Ernst & Young LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023. The table below presents the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022:
Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Audit fees(1)$1,175,000$1,063,000
Audit-related fees$$
Tax fees(2)$328,231$235,954
All other fees$$
Total$1,503,231$1,298,954
(1)
Audit fees pertain to the audit of stock ownership asour annual Consolidated Financial Statements, including review of the record date. For further information, please seeinterim financial statements contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters to underwriters in connection with our registration statements and security offerings, attest services, consents to the sectionincorporation of the Proxy Statement titled “How can I attendErnst & Young LLP audit report in publicly filed documents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)
Tax fees pertain to services performed for tax compliance, including REIT compliance; tax planning and tax advice, including preparation of tax returns and claims for refund; and tax-payment planning services. Tax planning and advice also includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, and tax advice related to specific transactions.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 71

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 4: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy
The services performed by Ernst & Young LLP in 2023 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. This policy requires that all engagement fees and the terms and scope of all audit and non-audit services be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in advance of their formal initiation.
Voting Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_propos4-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2024.

FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: ic_check-pn.gif]
72 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Audit Committee Report
Audit Committee Report
Our Board has appointed an Audit Committee presently composed of independent directors Stephen G. Kasnet, Sheila K. McGrath, W. Reid Sanders and Hope B. Woodhouse. Mr. Kasnet serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. Each of the directors on our Audit Committee is an independent director under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. Our Board has determined that each of Mr. Kasnet, Ms. McGrath and Ms. Woodhouse satisfies the definition of financial sophistication and is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC.
Our Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight with respect to the preparation, review and audit of our financial statements and the qualifications, independence and performance of our internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in its charter which is available on our website at www.gpmtreit.com. It is not the duty of our Audit Committee to prepare our financial statements or to plan or conduct audits. Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and for developing, maintaining and evaluating our internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our consolidated financial statements and for expressing an opinion as to whether they fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, as appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm.
Our Audit Committee reviews our financial reporting process on behalf of our Board. In performance of its oversight function, our Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, or EY, with respect to our audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2023 and related matters. Management advised our Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and our Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and EY. EY presented to and reviewed with our Audit Committee the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, and the SEC. EY also provided to our Audit Committee the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding EY’s communications with our Audit Committee concerning its independence, and, in connection therewith, our Audit Committee discussed with EY their views as to its independence. Our Audit Committee also reviewed, among other things, the audit and non-audit services performed by, and the amount of fees paid for such services to, EY. Our Audit Committee meetings regularly include executive sessions with EY without the presence of our management.
In undertaking its oversight function, our Audit Committee relied, without independent verification, on management’s representation that the financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on EY’s representation included in their report on our financial statements. Our Audit Committee is not, however, professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance or professional opinion as the sufficiency of the external or internal audits or whether our Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, our Audit Committee recommended to our Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for filing with the SEC.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board:
Stephen G. Kasnet (Chair)
Sheila K. McGrath
W. Reid Sanders
Hope B. Woodhouse
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 73

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Other Matters
Other Matters
Meeting Matters
Our Board does not intend to bring other matters before the Annual Meeting.”

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

Rebecca B. Sandberg

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

March 27, 2018

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDINGMeeting except items incident to the conduct of the meeting. However, on all matters properly brought before the meeting by our Board or others, the persons named as proxy holders in the accompanying proxy, or their substitutes, will vote on such matters in their discretion to the extent permitted by law.

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for
2025 Annual Meeting
PROPOSALS INCLUDED IN THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2018:

STATEMENT

If a stockholder intends to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the stockholder proposal must be received by the Secretary of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036, on or before December 23, 2024. A proposal must comply with all the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act to be included in our proxy materials relating to such meeting.
We suggest such proposals be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require us to include any stockholder proposal that does not meet all the requirements for such inclusion established by the SEC in effect at that time.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS OR OTHER PROPOSALS
Outside of Rule 14a-8, stockholders may nominate candidates for election to our Board or propose business for consideration at our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders under Maryland law and our Bylaws. Our Proxy StatementBylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our Board and 2017 the proposal of other business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (ii) by or at the direction of our Board or (iii) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the notice required by our Bylaws and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions set forth in our Bylaws.
Under our Bylaws, notice of such a nomination or proposal of other business must generally be provided to the Secretary not earlier than the 150th day nor later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or such a proposal at our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders must notify us in writing of such proposal by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 23, 2024, but not earlier than November 23, 2024. Any such nomination or proposal must include the information required by our Bylaws. Stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.
Annual Report which includes
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, are available at www.proxyvote.com.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

2

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

2

Are there any matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that are not included in this proxy statement?

2

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

2

What are my voting rights?

3

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

3

What is a proxy?

3

What is a proxy statement?

3

Why did I receive a notice instead of a full set of proxy materials?

3

Why did I receive more than one notice or printed set of proxy materials?

4

How can I2023, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder, without charge, upon written request to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036. You also may obtain a paper copy or an electronic copy of the proxy materials?

4

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner?

4

How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?

5

Can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

6

How does the Board recommend that I vote my shares, and what vote is required for approval of each proposal at the Annual Meeting?

6

If I submit my proxy, how will my shares of common stock be voted?

7

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

7

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

7

Who will count the votes?

8

How can I attend the Annual Meeting?

8

What is householding?

9

Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation?

9

Who can help answer my questions?

9

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

10

Board Composition

10

Director Nominations

10

Director Nominees

11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

16

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

16

Director Independence

16

i



Board Leadership Structure

17

Board Committees

17

Role of Our Board of Directors in Risk Oversight

20

Board Meetings

20

Director Nomination Process

20

Majority Voting for Directors and Director Resignation Policy

21

Communications with our Board of Directors

22

Director Compensation

22

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

24

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

24

Transactions with Related Persons

24

Related Person Transaction Policies

25

STOCK OWNERSHIP

26

Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Director Nominees and Named Executive Officers

26

Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent of Our Common Stock

27

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

27

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

27

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

28

Executive Officers

28

Executive Compensation Overview

30

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

30

Employment Agreements

35

Pension Benefits or Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

35

Summary Compensation Table

35

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

36

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

37

Stock Vested in 2017

37

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

37

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

38

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

38

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

39

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

39

PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

40

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT AND AUDITOR FEES

40

ii



Audit Committee Report

40

Use of Audit Committee Report

41

Auditor Fees

42

Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy

42

OTHER MATTERS

43

Meeting Matters

43

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2019 Annual Meeting

43

Annual Report

43

iii



PROXY STATEMENT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This executive summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. Page references are provided to help you find further information in this proxy statement.

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Date and Time:

Tuesday, May 15, 2018 | 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Place:

Loews Regency Hotel | 540 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065

Voting Eligibility:

Common stockholders as of the record date of March 21, 2018

VOTING MATTERS

Proposal (Page Number)

Board Recommendation

1.Election of nine directors ( p. 10)

FOR all nominees

2.Advisory vote relating to executive compensation (p. 39)

FOR

3.Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes relating to executive compensation (p. 39)

EVERY YEAR

4.Ratification of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm (p. 40)

FOR

CASTING YOUR VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on at our annual meeting. You may cast your vote in person at the annual meeting or in advance the annual meeting by:

Internet

Telephone

Mail

The deadline for advance voting is 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 14, 2018. For details on how to cast your vote in person or by using any one of these methods, see “General Information about the Annual Meeting and Voting” beginning on page 2.

1



GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on May 15, 2018

This proxy statement and our 2017 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Availability”) to the holders of our common stock as of the close of business on March 21, 2018. All common stockholders will be able to access our proxy materials on the Internet at the SEC’s website, referred to in the Notice of Availability (www.proxyvote.com)www.sec.gov, or request to receive a printed set ofon our proxy materials. Instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet or request a printed copy of our proxy materials may be found in the Notice of Availability.

We anticipate that the Notice of Availability will be mailed to common stockholders beginning on or about March 27, 2018.

website at www.gpmtreit.com.

74 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to vote on the following matters:

(1)
To elect as directors the ninesix nominees named in this proxy statement, each to serve until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified;

statement;

(2)
To holdapprove on an advisory vote relating tobasis the compensation of our named executive officers;

(3)
To holdapprove on an advisory vote onbasis the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes relating toregarding the compensation of our named executive officers;

officers

(4)
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firmauditor for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018;2024; and

(5)
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting orand any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Are there any matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that are not included in this proxy statement?

We currently are not aware of any business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting other than as described in this proxy statement. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, your proxy includes discretionary authority on the part of the individuals appointed to vote your shares of common stock or act on those matters according to their best judgment.

Why is the Company holding a virtual annual meeting?
We have elected to conduct our Annual Meeting in a virtual format to better facilitate stockholder participation by enabling stockholders to participate fully, and equally, from any location at no cost. We believe this approach increases our ability to engage with all stockholders, regardless of size, resources or physical location, and also provides cost savings for the Company. We have designed this virtual format to enhance, rather than constrain, stockholder access, participation and communication. For example, the online format allows stockholders to communicate with us in advance of, and during, the meeting so they can ask any appropriate questions to management and our Board.
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Our Board of Directors has set March 21, 2018,April 8, 2024, as the record date for the Annual Meeting. This means that the holders of our common stock as of the close of business on that date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments thereof. On the record date, there were 43,437,05951,034,800 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

2



A list of the holders of our common stock as of the record date will be available at our principal executive office, during normal business hours offor the ten days preceding the Annual Meeting, for examination by any registered holder of common stockholderstock as of the record date for any purpose pertaining to the Annual Meeting. Our principal executive office is located at 590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor,3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10022. This list will also be available to common stockholders of record for such purposes at the Annual Meeting.

10036.

What are my voting rights?

You are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held by you on the record date on all matters presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. There is no cumulative voting.

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

The presence, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of shares of our common stock entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum for the
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 75

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Frequently Asked Questions
transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Your shares will be counted toward the quorum if you submit a proxy or vote at the Annual Meeting. Shares represented by proxies marked “abstain” and “broker non-votes” also are counted in determining whether a quorum is present.

What is a proxy?

A proxy is your designation of another person to vote shares of our common stock that you own. The person you designate is called a proxy.proxy holder. If you designate someone as your proxy holder in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate a proxy holder, you also may direct the proxy holder how to vote your shares. We refer to this as your “proxy vote.” Two executive officers have been designated as proxiesproxy holders for our Annual Meeting. These executive officers areMeeting: John (“Jack”) A. Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Rebecca B. Sandberg,Michael J. Karber, our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.

What is a proxy statement?

A proxy statement is a document that SEC regulations require us to make available to you by Internet or, if you request, by mail when we ask you to designate proxiesproxy holders to vote your shares of our common stock at a meeting of our stockholders. This proxy statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by regulations of the SEC and rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

NYSE.

Why did I receive a noticeNotice of Availability instead of a full set of proxy materials?

As permitted by SEC rules, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet, which reduces the environmental impact and costs of our Annual Meeting. Accordingly, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to beneficial owners and the holders of record of our common stock who have not previously requested a printed set of proxy materials. TheAll holders of common stock will be able to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Availability contains instructions(www.proxyvote.com) or request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. Instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online as well as instructions on how toover the Internet or request a printed setcopy of our proxy materials.

3

materials may be found in the Notice of Availability.


Why did I receive more than one noticeNotice of Availability or printed set of proxy materials?

If you receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or printed set of proxy materials, it likely means that you hold shares of our common stock in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, you should vote once for each control number you receive, as described below under How“How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?”

How can I obtain a paper copy or an electronic copy of the proxy materials?

To obtain a paper copy or an electronic copy of the proxy materials, you will need your 16-digit control number, which was provided to you in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card included with your printed set of proxy materials. Once you have your control number, you may request a paper copy or an electronic copy of our proxy materials using any of the following methods: (i) visitwww.proxyvote.com and enter your control number when prompted; (ii) call 1-800-579-1639 and enter your control number when prompted; or (iii) send an email requesting electronic delivery of the materials to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner?

If your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares.

If your shares of common stock are held in a stock brokerage account, or by a bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee on how to vote the shares that you beneficially own and you are also invited to attend our Annual Meeting. However, beneficial owners generally cannot vote their shares directly because they are not the stockholder of record; instead, beneficial owners must instruct the
76 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Frequently Asked Questions
broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote their shares using the method described below under “How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?”
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We plan to publish the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?

4



How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a holder of record of our common stock, you may vote your shares or submit a proxy to be voted at the Annual Meeting by one of the following methods:

Vote by Internet

You may authorize your proxy online via the Internet by accessing the website www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided on the Notice of Availability or proxy card. Internet voting facilities will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on May 14, 2018. To vote by Internet, you will need to use the control number listed on your Notice of Availability or proxy card, which was provided to you by our vote tabulator, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.; then follow the additional steps when prompted. These steps have been designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting instructions and confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly.

Vote by Telephone

You may authorize your proxy by touch-tone telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903. Telephone voting facilities will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on May 14, 2017. To vote by telephone, you will need to use the control number listed on the Notice of Availability or proxy card, which was provided to you by our vote tabulator, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.; then follow the additional steps when prompted. The steps have been designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting instructions and confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly.

Vote by Mail

If you request paper copies of the proxy materials to be sent to you by mail, you may authorize your proxy by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the reply envelope included with the paper proxy materials.

Vote by Internet: You may authorize your proxy online via the Internet by accessing the website www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card.
Vote by Telephone: You may authorize your proxy by touch-tone telephone by calling the number and following the instructions provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card.
Vote by Mail: If you request paper copies of the proxy materials to be sent to you by mail, you may authorize your proxy by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the reply envelope included with the paper proxy materials.
Beneficial Owners.If your shares of common stock are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” If you hold your shares in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, which is similar to the voting procedures for stockholders of record. Other than ratifying the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firmauditor for the year ending December 31, 2018, the rules do not permit2024, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee is not permitted to vote your shares of stock on any proposal unless you provide them with specific instructions on how to vote your shares of common stock. You should instruct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares of common stock by following the directions provided by such party. However, if you request the proxy materials by mail after receiving a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you will receive a voting instruction form (not a proxy card) to use in directing such party how to vote your shares.

5



Can I vote my shares in person atduring the Annual Meeting?

If you are a holder of record of our common stock, you

You may vote your shares in person atduring the Annual Meeting until such time as the Chair declares the polls closed by completing a ballot atvisiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2024 and following the Annual Meeting. Even if you currently plan to attendinstructions. You will need the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you submit16-digit control number included in your proxy as described above so your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend. If you submit your vote by proxy and later decide to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, the vote you submit at the Annual Meeting will override your proxy vote.

If you are a beneficial ownercard, voting instruction form or Notice of our common stock, you may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain and bring to the Annual Meeting a signed letter or other formInternet Availability of proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee giving you the right to vote those shares at the Annual Meeting.

How does the Board recommend that I vote my shares, and what vote is required for approval of each proposal at the Annual Meeting?

Proposal

Board
Recommendation

Available

Voting

Options

Voting

Approval
Standard

Effect

of an
Abstention

Effect of

a Broker

Non-Vote

1.

Election of nine directors

FOR each of the nine nominees

FOR;

AGAINST; or ABSTAIN, with respect to each nominee

A nominee who receives a majority of all votes cast “for” such nominee is elected as a director

No Effect

No Effect

2.

Advisory vote relating to executive compensation

FOR

FOR;

AGAINST; or

ABSTAIN

Majority of all votes cast “for” the proposal

No Effect

No Effect

3.

Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes relating to executive compensation

EVERY YEAR

EVERY YEAR;

EVERY TWO YEARS;

EVERY THREE YEARS; or

ABSTAIN

The choice of frequency that receives the greatest number of votes is considered the preference of our stockholders

No Effect

No Effect

4.

Ratification of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm

FOR

FOR;

AGAINST; or

ABSTAIN

Majority of all votes cast “for” the proposal

No Effect

Not Applicable

6

Proxy Materials.


If I submit my proxy, how will my shares of common stock be voted?

How do you Hold
your Shares?

How Your Shares will be Voted

if You Specify How to Vote:

How Your Shares will be Voted if

You Do Not Specify How to Vote:

Stockholder of Record (your shares are registered in your name)

The named proxies will vote your shares as you direct on the proxy card.

The named proxies will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors.  In the case of Proposal 1, that means your shares will be voted FOR each director nominee. In the case of Proposals 2 and 4, that means your shares will be voted FOR each proposal. In the case of Proposal 3, that means your shares will be voted for the EVERY YEAR option.

Beneficial Owner (your shares are held in “street name”)

Your bank or broker will vote your shares as you direct them to.

Your bank or broker may use its discretion to vote only on items deemed by the NYSE to by “routine,” such as Proposal 4 - Ratification of Auditors. For non-routine items, such as Proposal 1, 2 and 3, your shares will be considered “uninstructed” and result in a broker non-vote.

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

Under NYSE rules, brokers, banks, trustees or other nominees who hold shares for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on a limited number of “routine” proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the annual meeting. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee does not receive such voting instructions and does not have the discretion to vote the shares. Pursuant to Maryland law, abstentions and broker non-votes are not included in the determination of the shares of common stock voting on such matters, but are counted for quorum purposes.

The only “routine” matter to be voted on at our Annual Meeting is Proposal 4 -4: Ratification of Auditors.Appointment of Independent Auditor. Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, your broker or other nomineethey may only vote your shares only on Proposal 4.

Your vote is important. We urge you to vote, or to instruct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote, your shares on all matters before the Annual Meeting. For more information regarding the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes on the outcome of a vote, please see “How does our Board recommend that
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 77

Frequently Asked Questions
I vote my shares and what vote is required for approval of each proposal at the Annual Meeting?” and “If I submit my proxy, how will my shares of common stock be voted?” below.
How does theour Board recommend that I vote my shares and what vote is required for approval of each Proposalproposal at the Annual Meeting?” and
ProposalBoard
Recommendation
Available Voting
Options
Voting Approval
Standard
Effect of an
Abstention
Effect of a
Broker
Non-Vote
1
Election of directors
FOR each of the six nomineesFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN, with respect to each nomineeA nominee who receives a majority of all votes cast FOR such nominee is elected as a directorNo EffectNo Effect
2
Advisory approval of executive compensation
FORFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINMajority of all votes cast FOR the proposalNo EffectNo Effect
3
Advisory approval of frequency of Say on Pay votes
EVERY YEAREVERY YEAR, EVERY TWO YEARS, or EVERY THREE YEARSThe choice of frequency that receives the greatest number of votesNo EffectNo Effect
4
Ratification of appointment of independent auditor
FORFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINMajority of all votes cast FOR the proposalNo EffectNot Applicable
If I submit my proxy, how will my shares of common stock be voted?

How Do You Hold Your Shares?How Your Shares Will Be Voted if You
Specify How to Vote:
How Your Shares Will Be Voted if You
Do Not Specify How to Vote:
Stockholder of Record (your shares are registered in your name)The named proxy holders will vote your shares as you direct on the proxy card.The named proxy holders will vote as recommended by our Board. In the case of Proposal 1, that means your shares will be voted FOR each director nominee. In the case of Proposals 2 and 4, that means your shares will be voted FOR each proposal. In the case of Proposal 3, that means your shares will be voted for a Say on Pay frequency of EVERY YEAR.
Beneficial Owner (your shares are held in “street name”)Your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will vote your shares as you direct them to.Your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee may use its discretion to vote only on items deemed by the NYSE to be “routine,” such as Proposal 4: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor. For non-routine items, such as Proposals 1-3, your shares will be considered “uninstructed” and result in a broker non-vote.
Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

You may change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised. For holdersIf you are a holder of record of our common stock ifand you voted by mail, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by executing and delivering a timely and valid later-dated proxy, by voting in person by

7


via the Internet during

ballot at
78 / gpmtreit.com/investors


Frequently Asked Questions
the virtual Annual Meeting or by giving written notice of such revocation to the Secretary. If you voted by Internet or telephone, you may also change your vote with a timely and valid later-dated Internet or telephone vote, as the case may be, or by voting in person by ballot atvia the Internet during the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the virtual Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless (i) you give proper written notice of revocation to the Secretary before the proxy is exercised;exercised or (ii) you vote by ballot in person atonline during the Annual Meeting.

Notices of revocation of proxies should be sent to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., Attention: Rebecca B. Sandberg,Michael J. Karber, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, 590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor,3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10022.

10036.

Who will count the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., our independent proxy tabulator, will count the votes and will act as our inspector of election for the Annual Meeting.

votes.

How can I attend the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be heldconducted virtually via the Internet on Tuesday, MayThursday, June 6, 2024. You can attend the meeting by logging in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2024 and following the instructions provided on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. We recommend that you log in at least 15 2018, at Loews Regency Hotel, 540 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065.minutes before the Annual Meeting to ensure you are present when the meeting starts. Only stockholders who own shares of our common stock as of the record date, March 21, 2018,April 8, 2024, and who log on with their 16-digit control number may submit questions and vote at the Annual Meeting. Attendees who do not enter a valid 16-digit control number may listen to the Annual Meeting but may not ask a question or vote. You may still virtually attend the Annual Meeting. We encourageMeeting if you to register to attendvote by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting.
If you wish to attend the virtual Annual Meeting at a location provided by contactingus, our Investor Relations departmentlegal counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, will air the webcast at its offices located at One Manhattan West, New York, New York 10001. Please note that no members of management or our Board will be in attendance at this location, and you will not have the ability to vote your shares during the Annual Meeting from this location. If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting via webcast at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP’s offices, you must complete and return the Reservation Request Form found at the end of this proxy statement.
How can I submit questions for the Annual Meeting?
You may submit questions prior to the meeting at www.proxyvote.com or during the meeting by phone at (212) 364-3200 or by emailing investors@gpmortgagetrust.comlogging in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2024. AttendanceQuestions pertinent to matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, as well as appropriate questions regarding the business and operations of the Company, will be limitedanswered during the Annual Meeting, subject to persons presenting valid government-issued photo identificationtime constraints. In the interests of time and proofefficiency, we reserve the right to group questions of stock ownership asa similar nature together to facilitate the question-and-answer portion of the record date, March 21, 2018. No cameras, recording devices or large packages willmeeting. We may not be permittedable to answer all questions submitted in the meeting room. For information to help determine whether you are a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner, please see “What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner?”

Stockholders of Record. If your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company, you will need to present the following items to gain admission to the Annual Meeting:

·valid government-issued photo identification; and

·proof of ownership as of the record date, which may include a copy of your account statement from our transfer agent or a copy of your stock certificate.

Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of common stock held in street name by a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you will need to present the following to gain admission to the Annual Meeting:

·valid government-issued photo identification; and

·proof of share ownership as of the record date, by providing a bank or brokerage firm account statement or a letter from the broker, trustee, bank or nominee holding your shares.

8

allotted time.


What is householding?

We may send a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as well as other stockholder communications, to any household at which two or more stockholders reside unless we receive other instructioninstructions from you. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and printing and postage costs, and conserve natural resources. If your Notice of Availability is being householded and you wish to receive multiple copies of the Notice of Availability, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive a single copy, you may contact:

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.


Householding Department


51 Mercedes Way


Edgewood, New York 11717


1-866-540-7095

If you participate in householding and would like to receive a separate copy of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Notice of Availability or proxy statement, please contact Broadridge in the manner described above. Broadridge will deliver the requested documents to you promptly upon receipt of your request.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 79

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Frequently Asked Questions
Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies and may make arrangements with brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries to send proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock. We will reimburse these third parties for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors and officers may solicit proxies by telephone, electronic transmission and personally. Our directors and officers will not receive any special compensation for such services. We have retained Morrow SodaliAlliance Advisors, LLC, 470 West Avenue, Stamford, Connecticut 06902,to assist in the solicitation of proxies for an estimatedthe Annual Meeting for a fee of $8,500,$15,000, plus out of pocket expenses, to assist us in soliciting proxies.

associated costs and expenses.

Who can help answer my questions?

If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares or if you need additional copies of this proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card, please contact our Investor Relations department at our principal executive office:

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.


Attention: Investor Relations

590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor


3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A
New York, New York 10022

10036
Phone 212-364-3200

212-364-5500
Email: investors@gpmortgagetrust.com

9


investors@gpmtreit.com

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION
80 / gpmtreit.com/investors


Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures
Appendix – Definitions and Calculation
of Non-GAAP Measures
Definitions of Terms Used in Proxy Summary
Debt-to-Equity: Borrowings outstanding on repurchase facilities, securitized debt obligations and secured credit facility, less cash, divided by total stockholders’ equity.
Stabilized LTV: The fully funded loan amount (plus any financing that is pari passu with or senior to our Bylaws, our directors are elected by stockholders each year at our annual meeting to serve terms expiring at the next annual meeting. Our Bylaws provide that our Board of Directors may be comprised of no less than the number of directors requiredsuch loan), including all contractually provided for future fundings, divided by the Maryland General Corporation Law and no more than 15,as stabilized value (as determined in conformance with the precise number to be set by our BoardUniform Standards of Directors. The Board of Directors has set the size of our Board at nine, and our Board of Directors is currently comprised of nine directors.

Director Nominations

Action will be taken at the Annual Meeting for the election of nine directors, each to hold office until our annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2019 and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Information concerning each of the nine director nominees standing for election to our Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting is set forth below. Each of the nominees has been recommended for nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and nominated by our Board of Directors. If elected, it is expected that each of the director nominees will be able to serve, but if any such nominee is unable or unwilling to serve, the proxies reserve discretion to vote or refrain from voting for a substitute nominee or nominees.

We believe that each of the director nominees displays personal and professional integrity; satisfactory levels of education and/or business experience; business acumen; an appropriate level of understanding of our business and its industry and other industries relevant to our business; the ability and willingness to devote adequate time to the work of our Board of Directors and its Committees; a fit of skills and personality with those of our other directors that helps build a board that is effective and responsive to the needs of our company; strategic thinking and a willingness to express ideas; a diversity of experiences, expertise and background; and the ability to represent the interests of our stockholders. The information presented below regarding each director nominee also sets forth specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board of Directors to conclude that he or she should be nominated to stand for election to serve as a director.

10



Director Nominees

Tanuja M. Dehne

Director since: 2017

Age: 46

Board Committees:

·Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

·Compensation

Background: Ms. Dehne is an independent member of our Board of Directors and has served as a director since June of 2017.  Ms. Dehne has also served as a director of Advanced Disposal Services, Inc. (NYSE: ADSW) since May 2017. From December 2012 until May 2017, Ms. Dehne served as an independent director of Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. From October 2014 through April 2016, she was the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer and Chief of Staff of NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG), a publicly listed power generation and retail electricity company. In this role, Ms. Dehne oversaw NRG’s Human Resources, Information Technology, Communications, Corporate Marketing and Sustainability Departments, including the company’s charitable giving program, M&A integrations and Big Data Analytics. Prior to these positions, she was the Senior Vice President, Human Resources of NRG since 2011 where she led NRG’s Human Resources department, which handled all HR functions for more than 8,000 employees. From 2004 to 2011, Ms. Dehne served as the Corporate Secretary of NRG, leading corporate governance and corporate transactions, including financing, mergers and acquisitions, public and private securities offerings, securities and stock exchange matters, and reporting compliance. Prior to joining NRG, Ms. Dehne practiced corporate law as a member of Saul Ewing LLP’s business department. She received a J.D. from Syracuse University, an M.A. from the University of Pennsylvania in political science and a B.A. from Lafayette College.  We believe Ms. Dehne is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of her knowledge of corporate governance, background serving in various executive management roles and prior public company experience.

Martin A. Kamarck

Director since: 2017

Age: 68

Board Committees:

·Compensation (Chair),

·Nominating and Corporate Governance

Background: Mr. Kamarck is an independent member of our Board of Directors and has served as a director since June of 2017. Mr. Kamarck has over 40 years of experience in business and law in both the public and private sectors.  He has served as the head of structuring at Elanus Capital Management, LLC, an alternative asset manager since January 2011. Prior to that time, from 1999 to 2005, he was the President of Radian Asset Assurance Inc., the financial guarantee arm of Radian Group Inc. (NYSE:RDN). Prior to Radian, Mr. Kamarck served as Chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States and Co-Head of Structured Credit and General Counsel at Financial Guarantee Insurance Corporation.  Mr. Kamarck began his professional career as an attorney with Morrison and Foerster, at which he ultimately became a Partner and head of the securitization practice.  He received a J.D. from Stanford Law School in 1975 and a B.A. in English Literature from Haverford College in 1971.  We believe Mr. Kamarck is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of his extensive background in the financial services industry and experience serving in executive management and leadership roles.

11



Stephen G. Kasnet

Director since: 2017

Age: 72

Board Committees:

·Audit (Chair)

Background: Mr. Kasnet is an independent member of our Board of Directors and has been appointed as its Lead Independent Director.  He has served as a director since June of 2017.  Mr. Kasnet also serves as a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO). He previously served as a director of Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. and a director and chair of Columbia Laboratories, Inc., a specialty pharmaceuticals company (NASDAQ: CBRX), now Juniper Pharmaceuticals, from 2004 to 2015, including as Chairman of the Board. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Kasnet was the Chairman of Dartmouth Street Capital LLC, a private investment firm. He was also the President and Chief Executive Officer of Raymond Property Company LLC, a real estate company, from 2007 through October 2009. From 2000 to 2006, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Harbor Global Company, Ltd., an asset management, natural resources and real estate investment company, and President of the PIOglobal, a Russian real estate investment fund. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Kasnet was a director and member of the Executive Committee of The Bradley Real Estate Trust. He was Chairman of Warren Bank and Warren Bancorp from 1990 to 2003. Mr. Kasnet has also held senior management positions with other financial organizations, including Pioneer Group, Inc., First Winthrop Corporation and Winthrop Financial Associates, and Cabot, Cabot and Forbes. He serves as Chairman of the Board of Rubicon Ltd., a forestry company (NZX:RBC), as a director of First Ipswich Bancorp, a bank owned by Brookline Bancorp, and as a director of GoodBulk, Ltd., a cargo company. He formerly served as a director of Tenon Ltd., a wood products company, FTD Corporation and Republic Engineered Products. He is also a trustee of the board of the Governor’s Academy, a private coed boarding high school in Byfield, Massachusetts. Mr. Kasnet received a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Kasnet was appointed to our Board of Directors pursuant to a Director Designation Agreement, between us and Two Harbors, entered into in connection with our IPO. We believe Mr. Kasnet is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of his broad business background, extensive experience as a director of public companies, and his qualification as an audit committee financial expert.

William Roth

Director since: 2017

Age: 60

Background: Mr. Roth is a member of our Board of Directors and has served as a director of our company since its inception.  Mr. Roth also serves as a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO), and has served as its Chief Investment Officer since January 2013 after serving as Co-Chief Investment Officer from October 2009 until January 2013. Mr. Roth is a Partner of our external manager, Pine River Capital Management L.P., and is a Director of the Pine River Foundation.  Prior to joining Pine River in 2009, Mr. Roth was at Citigroup and its predecessor firm, Salomon Brothers Inc., for 28 years where he was named a Director in 1987 and a Managing Director in 1997. From 2004 to 2009, Mr. Roth managed a proprietary trading book at Citigroup with particular focus on mortgage and asset-backed securities. From 1994 to 2004, Mr. Roth was part of the Salomon/Citi New York Mortgage Sales Department. From 1981 to 1994, Mr. Roth managed the Chicago Financial Institutions Sales Group for Salomon Brothers. He received an M.B.A. with a concentration in Finance from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business in 1981, and a B.S. in Finance and Economics from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio in 1979.  We believe Mr. Roth is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of his investment experience and financial services background, as well as his role as a partner of Pine River, which helps ensure that adequate resources are devoted to our company.

12



W. Reid Sanders

Director since: 2017

Age: 68

Board Committees:

·Audit

·Compensation

Background: Mr. Sanders is an independent member of our Board of Directors and has served as a director since June of 2017.  He currently serves as the President of Sanders Properties, Inc., a real estate company and is a director, and member of the audit, compensation risk oversight committees, of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO).  He also serves as a director and member of the audit committee and investment committee of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (NYSE: MAA), a real estate investment trust that owns and operates apartment complexes. Mr. Sanders is a member of the board, and executive and compensation committees of Independent Bank, a bank holding company; serves on the investment committee at Cypress Realty, a commercial real estate company; and is on the advisory board of SSM Venture Partners III, L.P., a private venture capital firm. He is the former chairman of the board of Two Rivers Capital Management, and his former directorships include Harbor Global Company Ltd., an asset management, natural resources and real estate investment company, Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp., PioGlobal Asset Management, a private investment management company, The Pioneer Group Inc., a global investment management firm, and TBA Entertainment Corporation, a strategic communications and entertainment marketing company. He was co-founder and former Executive Vice President of Southeastern Asset Management, and former President of Longleaf Partners Mutual Funds, from 1975 to 2000.  He served as an Investment Officer at First Tennessee Investment Management, the investment management division of First Horizon National Corporation, from 1973 to 1975. Mr. Sanders is a trustee of the Hugo Dixon Foundation, the Dixon Gallery and Gardens, the Hutchison School, Rhodes College, and the Tennessee Shakespeare Company, and is a former trustee of The Jefferson Scholars Foundation and the Campbell Clinic Foundation. Mr. Sanders was appointed to our Board of Directors pursuant to a Director Designation Agreement, between us and Two Harbors, entered into in connection with our IPO We believe Mr. Sanders is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of his extensive background in the financial services and real estate businesses, and his experience serving as a director and audit committee member of public companies.

Thomas E. Siering

Director since: 2017

Age: 58

Background: Mr. Siering is an independent member of our Board of Directors and has served as a director of our company since its inception.  Mr. Siering also serves as a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO), and has served as its Chief Executive Officer and President since its founding in May 2009.  Mr. Siering is a Partner of our external manager, Pine River Capital Management L.P., and is a Director of the Pine River Foundation. Prior to joining Pine River in 2006, Mr. Siering was head of the Value Investment Group at EBF & Associates, a private investment firm, from 1989 until 2006. During that period, he was also the manager for Merced Partners, LP, a private investment firm, and Tamarack International Limited, a closed end, non-diversified investment management company. Mr. Siering was named a Partner at EBF & Associates in 1997. Mr. Siering joined EBF & Associates in 1989 as a trader. From 1987 to 1989, Mr. Siering held various positions in the Financial Markets Department at Cargill, Inc. From 1981 until 1987, Mr. Siering was employed in the Domestic Soybean Processing Division at Cargill in both trading and managerial roles. Mr. Siering also served on the board of directors of Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. Mr. Siering holds a B.B.A. from the University of Iowa with a major in Finance.  We believe Mr. Siering is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of his extensive

13



investment experience and his role as a partner of Pine River, which helps ensure that adequate resources are devoted to our company.

Brian C. Taylor

Director since: 2017

Age: 53

Background: Mr. Taylor is the chairman of our Board of Directors. He has been a director of our company since its inception. Mr. Taylor is the Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chief Investment Officer of our external manager, Pine River Capital Management L.P., which he founded in 2002.  Mr. Taylor also serves as chair of the board of directors of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO).  Prior to founding Pine River, Mr. Taylor was with EBF & Associates from 1988 to 2002, where he was named head of the convertible arbitrage group in 1994 and a Partner in 1997. His responsibilities at EBF included portfolio management, marketing, product development and trading information systems development. Mr. Taylor received an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago and a B.S. from Millikin University in Decatur, Illinois. Mr. Taylor passed the Illinois Certified Public Accountant Examination in 1986. Mr. Taylor currently serves on the board of directors for Northside Achievement Zone. He also previously served as a director and Chairman of Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. from 2012 to 2014. We believe Mr. Taylor is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of his extensive investment experience and his role as the Chief Executive Officer of Pine River, which helps ensure that adequate resources are devoted to our company.

John A. Taylor

Director since: 2017

Age: 62

Background: Mr. Taylor is our Chief Executive Officer and President and a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Taylor has been a director and executive officer of our company since its inception. Mr. Taylor also serves as Global Head of Commercial Real Estate and a member of the Investment Committee of the company’s external manager, Pine River Capital Management L.P., since November 2014.  Prior to joining Pine River, Mr. Taylor served as a Managing Director and Head of Global Real Estate Finance for Prudential Real Estate Investors from 2009 to November 2014, where he also was a member of the Global Management Committee and chaired the Global Investment Committee for debt and equity.  From 2003 to 2007, Mr. Taylor was a partner at Five Mile Capital Partners LLC. Prior to Five Mile Capital, he was co-head of real estate investment banking for the Americas and Europe at UBS. He previously led the Real Estate Group at Paine Webber and served on the firm’s Operating Committee, and was head trader and manager of the CMBS and Principal Commercial Mortgage business for Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. Mr. Taylor was a founding governor of the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association (now the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council) and a member of the President’s Council of the Real Estate Roundtable. Mr. Taylor received a J.D. from Yale Law School, a MSc. in international relations from the London School of Economics and Political Science, and a B.A. in philosophy from the University of Illinois.  We believe Mr. Taylor is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of his role as our company’s Chief Executive Officer and his extensive knowledge of and experience in the commercial real estate markets in which the company operates.

14



Hope B. Woodhouse

Director since: 2017

Age: 61

Board Committees:

·Audit

·Nominating and Corporate Governance

Background: Ms. Woodhouse is an independent member of our Board of Directors and has served as a director since June of 2017.  Ms. Woodhouse has over 25 years of experience in the financial services industry at top-ranked, global alternative asset management firms and broker dealers. Ms. Woodhouse has served as a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO) since May 2012.  From 2005 to 2009, she served as Chief Operating Officer and as a member of the management committee for Bridgewater Associates, Inc. Between 2003 and 2005, Ms. Woodhouse was President and Chief Operating Officer of Auspex Group, L.P., and was Chief Operating Officer and a member of the management committee of Soros Fund Management LLC from 2000 to 2003. Prior to that, she held various executive leadership positions, including Treasurer of Funds at Tiger Management L.L.C. from 1998 to 2000 and Managing Director of the Global Finance Department at Salomon Brothers Inc. from 1983 to 1998. She has previously served as a director of Piper Jaffray Companies (NYSE: PJC) and as a member of its audit and compensation committees, Seoul Securities Co. Ltd., Soros Funds Limited and The Bond Market Association. Ms. Woodhouse also serves on the boards of Bottom Line New York, the Kindergarten Reading Collaborative, Children’s Services Advisory Committee and the John’s Island Community Service League and is a trustee of the Tiger Foundation, and a member of the investment committee at Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts. Ms. Woodhouse received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and an A.B. degree in Economics from Georgetown University.  Ms. Woodhouse was appointed to our Board of Directors pursuant to a Director Designation Agreement, between us and Two Harbors, entered into in connection with our IPO. We believe Ms. Woodhouse is qualified to serve as a director of the company because of her background in the financial services industry, her experience as a director of public companies, and her qualification as an audit committee financial expert.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

15



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors is committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance. As described more fully below, we have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to the conduct of our officers and directors, as well as to the employees of our external manager, Pine River Capital Management L.P., and its affiliates. We have also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which, in conjunction with our Charter, Bylaws and our board committee charters, provide the framework for our corporate governance practices.

You can access our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and certain other policies under “Corporate Governance” in the Investors section of our website at www.gpmortgagetrust.com or by writing to our Investor Relations department at Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers and directors and to Pine River’s officers, directors and employees when such individuals are acting for us or on our behalf. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to detect and deter wrongdoing and to promote:

·honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

·full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our SEC reports and other public communications;

·compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

·prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to appropriate persons identified in the Code; and

·accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Any waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our executive officers or directors may be made only by our Board of Directors or a committee thereof and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or stock exchange regulations. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was adopted by the Board of Directors on June 14, 2017.

Director Independence

NYSE rules require that a majority of a company’s board of directors be composed of “independent directors,” which is defined generally as a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Consistent with these considerations, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined, upon the review and recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that the following directors and director nominees each meet the qualifications of an independent director: Tanuja M. Dehne, Martin A. Kamarck, Stephen G. Kasnet, W. Reid Sanders and Hope B. Woodhouse.

16



Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors is led by a Chairman who is appointed by the directors. Both independent and non-independent directors are eligible for appointment as the Chairman. The Chairman presides at all meetings of our stockholders and of our Board of Directors. The Chairman performs such other duties and exercises such powers as from time to time shall be prescribed in our Bylaws or by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has appointed Mr. Brian Taylor to serve as our Chairman.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the independent directors shall appoint a director to serve as the lead independent director. The lead independent director is responsible for coordinating the activities of the other independent directors, including scheduling and conducting separate meetings of the independent directors and for such other duties as are assigned from time to time by our Board of Directors. Our independent directors have appointed Mr. Kasnet to serve as our lead independent director.

Our Board of Directors consists of a majority of independent directors and exercises a strong, independent oversight function. All of the committees of our Board of Directors – Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance – are comprised entirely of independent directors. A number of board committee processes and procedures, including regular executive sessions of independent directors and a regular review of the performance of our external manager, provide substantial independent oversight of our management’s performance. Under our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board of Directors has the ability to change its structure if it determines that such a change is appropriate and in the best interest of our company. Our Board of Directors believes that these factors provide the appropriate balance between the authority of those who oversee our company and those who manage it on a day-to-day basis.

We currently separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. However, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are both affiliated with our external manager, Pine River Capital Management L.P. Our Board of Directors believes that this affiliation benefits our company because these individuals are knowledgeable about our company’s business and they are able to ensure that adequate resources are devoted to the company by Pine River pursuant to our Management Agreement between us and Pine River Capital Management dated June 28, 2017 (the “Management Agreement”).

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has formed three committees, including our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, and has adopted charters for each of these committees. Each committee is composed exclusively of directors who meet the independence and other requirements established by the rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE listing standards. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of individuals intended to be, to the extent required by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, non-employee directors.

17



The following table summarizes the current membership of each of our committees.

Director

Audit

Compensation

Nominating &

Corporate Governance

Tanuja M. Dehne

x

Chair

Martin A. Kamarck

Chair

x

Stephen G. Kasnet

Chair

W. Reid Sanders

x

x

Hope B. Woodhouse

x

x

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is responsible for engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, preparing Audit Committee reports, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees, and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.

Our Audit Committee is, and will at all times be, composed exclusively of “independent directors” as defined under the NYSE listing standards and who otherwise meet the NYSE listing standards. Each member of our Audit Committee is also financially literate, in that they are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.

In addition, as a listed company, we must certify that our Audit Committee has and will continue to have at least one member who is financially sophisticated in that he or she has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Kasnet and Ms. Woodhouse satisfies the definition of financial sophistication and also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations of the SEC.

Our Audit Committee’s purpose and responsibilities are more fully set forth in its charter.

Compensation Committee

The principal functions of our Compensation Committee are to:

·evaluate the performance of our executive officers;

·in consultation with senior management, establish the company’s general compensation philosophy and review the compensation philosophy of the company’s external manager;

·evaluate the performance of our external manager Pine River;

·review the compensation and fees payable to Pine River under the Management Agreement;

·review the compensation and fees payable to any affiliates of Pine River or any other related party;

18



·prepare Compensation Committee reports;

·make recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to our company’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans; and

·administer any equity incentive plan, including the issuance of any common stock or other equity awards there under to employees of Pine River who provide services to us under the Management Agreement.

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the compensation of our company’s independent directors.  In doing so, the Compensation Committee will work with our independent compensation consultant and consider, among other things, the following:

·the compensation that is paid to directors of other companies that are comparable to us;

·the amount of time directors are expected to devote to preparing for and attending meetings of our Board of Directors and the committees on which they serve;

·the success of our company;

·whether a director is a lead independent director or chairman of one of the committees of our Board of Directors and the time commitment related thereto;

·if a committee on which a director serves undertakes a special assignment, the importance of that special assignment to our company and its stockholders; and

·the risks involved in serving as a director on our Board of Directors or a member of its committees.

All decisions concerning independent director compensation are made by the non-independent, disinterested members of our Board of Directors, none of whom are paid for their service on our Board. Other than our Chief Executive Officer, who serves as a non-independent director, none of our executive officers are involved in determining independent director compensation levels, although our management team may provide support to the Compensation Committee and its independent compensation consultant, including certain information, data and other resources in connection with its compensation recommendations to our Board of Directors.

Our Compensation Committee may delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee’s purpose and responsibilities are more fullyProfessional Appraisal Practice) set forth in the Compensation Committee’s charter.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsibleoriginal appraisal. As stabilized value may be based on certain assumptions, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting, payment of tenant improvement or leasing commissions allowances or free or abated rent periods, or increased tenant occupancies.

Weighted Average Yield: Provided for seeking, considering and recommending to our Boardillustrative purposes only. Calculations of Directors qualified candidates for election as directors and approves and recommends to the full Board of Directors the appointment of each of our executive officers. It also periodically prepares and submits to our Board of Directors for adoption its selection criteria for director nominees. It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our Board of Directors and our corporate governance, and annually recommends to our Board of Directors nominees for each committee of our Board of Directors. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually facilitates the assessment of our Board of Directors’ performance and report thereon to our Board of Directors.

19



Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the following factors in making its recommendations to the Board of Directors: background experience, skills, expertise, accessibility and availability to serve effectively on the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also conducts inquiries into the background and qualifications of potential candidates.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s purpose and responsibilitiesall-in yield at origination are more fully set forth in its charter.

Role of Our Board of Directors in Risk Oversight

Our management is responsible for assessing and managing the risks faced by our company, subject to the oversight of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors exercises its oversight of our company’s risks, including through the review of our business plans, capital structure, financial results, and infrastructure.  The Board has also established investment guidelines, which set parameters for the type and size of investments we can make without further Board approval.  Additionally, the Board of Directors relies upon our Audit Committee to oversee risks related to the quality and integrity of our financial reports, the performance and independence of our external auditor, the performance of our internal audit function, our policies regarding accounting and financial matters and internal controls, and performance of our information technology and data security function, including as it relates to cybersecurity.

Management routinely informs the Board of Directors and its Committees of developments that could affect our risk profile or other aspects of our business.

Cyber Security

Our external manager provides our company with personnel, including its Chief Information Security Officer, to help manage the growing complexity of cyber risks.  Our external manager’s Chief Information Security Officer will report to the Board of Directors and/or the Audit Committeebased on a regular basis regarding our company’s exposure to cyber risk, including with respect to our cyber security infrastructure, the development and implementation of policies, procedures, standards and technical measures to create an environment that is designed to minimize exposure to cyber threats and recovery from adverse events, if any.

Board Meetings

We commenced operating as a public company on June 28, 2017.  During the remainder of 2017, our Board of Directors held three meetings. During certain meetings of our Board of Directors, the independent directors also met separately in executive sessions without management present to discuss various matters. During that same period, our Audit Committee held four meetings. Our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not hold in-person meetings during that time, but the Chairs of each committee were actively working with management in 2017 to develop processes and agendas for future meetings, and the Compensation Committee took action on a variety of matters by unanimous written consent in lieu of holding formal meetings.  Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate total number of meetings held by the Boardassumptions (some or all of Directorswhich may not occur) and all committees on which heare expressed as monthly equivalent yields that include net origination fees and exit fees and exclude future fundings and any potential or she served during 2017.

Director Nomination Process

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the following minimum qualifications for directorscompleted loan amendments or modifications. Calculations of all-in weighted average yield at origination exclude fixed-rate loans.

Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures Used in order to be considered for a position on our Board of Directors:

20

CD&A


·possession of the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;

·the ability to exercise good business judgment and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the company and its stockholders;

·having an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment; and

·willingness to devote the necessary time and effort to board of director duties, including preparing for and attending meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees.

In considering candidates for nomination as a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee generally assembles all information regarding a candidate’s background and qualifications, evaluates a candidate’s mix of skills and qualifications and determines the contribution that the candidate could be expected to make to the overall functioning of our Board of Directors. AlthoughCertain financial measures we do not have a formal policy on diversity, our corporate governance guidelines provide that our company shall endeavor to have a Board of Directors representing a diverse education and experience that provides knowledge of business, financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. With respect to the re-nomination of current directors, the Committee considers the foregoing factors as well as past participation in and contributions to the activities of our Board of Directors and its committees.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended for nomination to our Board of Directors by our stockholders. Stockholder recommendations for nominees to the Board of Directors should be submitted in writing to our Secretary. The manner in which such Committee evaluates candidates recommended by stockholders is generally the same as any other candidate, including customary diligence, interviews and background checks. However, the Committee will also seek and consider information concerning any relationship between a stockholder recommending a candidate and the candidateuse to determine if the candidate can represent the interests of all of the stockholders. The Committee willexecutive compensation are non-GAAP measures. These measures are not evaluate a candidate recommended by a stockholder unless the stockholder’s proposal provides a certification that the potential candidate consents to being named in our proxy statement and will serve as a director if elected.

Majority Voting for Directors and Director Resignation Policy

Our Bylaws provide that a director nominee will be elected by receiving the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the election of such nominee on a per nominee basis in an uncontested election (which occurs when the number of director nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected). If a director nominee who is an incumbent director receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election and with respect to whom no successor has been elected, such incumbent director shall promptly tender his or her offer to resign to our Board of Directors for its consideration following certification of the stockholder vote. Within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider the tendered resignation offer and make a recommendation to our Board of Directors whether or not to accept such offer, and our Board of Directors shall act on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation. In determining whether to accept the resignation, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board of Directors may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation, including, among other things, whether accepting the resignation of such director would cause our company to fail to meet any applicable stock exchange or SEC rules or requirements. Thereafter, our Board of Directors shall promptly and publicly disclose its decision-making process regarding whether to accept the director’s resignation offer or the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable, on a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. Any director who tenders

21



his or her resignation will not participate in our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or our Board of Directors’ action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. If our Board of Directors does not accept the director’s resignation, such director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until such director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.

In a contested election, the director nominees who receive a plurality of votes cast will be elected as directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of persons equal to the number of vacancies to be filled who receive more votes than other nominees are elected to our Board of Directors, regardless of whether they receive a majority of votes cast.

Communications with our Board of Directors

We provide the opportunity for our stockholders and all other interested parties to communicate with members of our Board of Directors. Stockholders and all other interested parties may communicate with the independent directors or the chairperson of any of the committees of the Board of Directors by email or regular mail. All communications should be sent to the company’s Secretary, Rebecca B. Sandberg, by email to secretary@gpmortgagetrust.com or by regular mail to the attention of the Independent Directors, the Chair of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Compensation Committee, or the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as the case may be, in each instance in care of the Secretary at the company’s office at 590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Our Secretary will review each communication received in accordance with, this process to determine whether the communication requires immediate action. The Secretary will forward all appropriate communications received, or a summary of such communications, to the appropriate member(s) of our Board of Directors. However, we reserve the right to disregard any communication that we determine is unduly hostile, threatening or illegal, or does not reasonably relate to us or our business, or is similarly inappropriate. The Secretary has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications.

Stockholder proposals must be madesubstitute for, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, and they may differ from the procedures set forth in our current Bylaws or the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act and not the procedures set forth in the preceding paragraph or the procedures set forth under “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors – Director Nomination Process” above. Nominationsnon-GAAP financial measures reported by other companies. See below for the Board of Directors proposed may only be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our Bylaws. Certain matters set forth in our Bylaws for stockholder proposals, including nominations for our Board of Directors, as well as certain matters set forth in Rule 14a-8 for stockholders proposals are described in “Other Matters – Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2019 Annual Meeting” in this proxy statement.

Director Compensation

We compensate the independent members of our Board of Directors for their service. It is our belief that director compensation should:

·align the interests of our directors and our stockholders;

·ensure our company can attract and retain outstanding director candidates who meet the selection criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter; and

·reflect the substantial time commitment of our directors necessary to oversee our business.

22



Generally, it has been our practice to compensate our independent directors with a mix of cash and equity-based compensation. We do not pay any compensation to the non-independent directors for their service on our Board of Directors. However, all members of our Board of Directors are reimbursed for their costs and expenses of serving on the Board of Directors, including costs and expenses of attending all meetings of our Board of Directors and its Committees. As discussed above, the Compensation Committee Charter provides that the Compensation Committee has the primary responsibility for reviewing and recommending any changes to director compensation. Our Board of Directors reviews the Compensation Committee’s recommendations and the non-independent, disinterested directors make all decisions concerning the amount and manner of independent director compensation.

Independent Director Compensation for 2017

For the partial-year term that began on the day we commenced operations (June 28, 2017) and ends at the 2018 Annual Meeting, our director compensation policy specifies that each of our independent directors, which includes the individuals listed below,information about how these measures were entitled to earn the following fees for their service:

·for each independent director, an annual fee of $100,000, paid half in cash and half in shares of our common stock;

·for the Audit Committee Chair, an additional fee of $15,000, paid half in cash and half in shares of our common stock; and

·for the lead independent director, an additional fee of $35,000, paid half in cash and half in shares of our common stock.

The cash portion of these annual fees is paid in four equal quarterly installments over the course of the term. The common stock portion of the annual fees is granted under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), which generally occurs on the first business day following the annual meeting of stockholders at which such director is elected, and in the case of the 2017 partial-year term, on effective as of the date that such individuals began their service, as applicable.  The number of shares of common stock subject to issuance is determined using the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, which is based on the closing market price on the NYSE on the grant date. The common stock granted to the independent directors under our Equity Incentive Plan as part of the director fees noted above vests immediately on the grant date.

calculated.

CHANGE IN BOOK VALUE PER COMMON SHARE
The following table showsprovides a reconciliation of GAAP stockholders’ equity to Change in Book Value per Common Share from the compensationyear ended December 31, 2022, to the year ended December 31, 2023:
(in thousands, except share data)December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
Stockholders’ equity$858,898$983,545
7.00% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock liquidation preference$(205,738)$(205,738)
Common stockholders’ equity (A, B)$653,160$777,807
Shares:
Common stock50,577,84152,258,404
Restricted stock92,585
Total outstanding50,577,84152,350,989
Book value per share of common stock (C, D)$12.91$14.86
Dollar change in book value per common share (E = C – D)$(1.95)
Percentage change in book value per common share (F = E / D)(13.1)%
2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 81

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures
DISTRIBUTABLE EARNINGS, “CORE” ROAE AND “RUN-RATE” ROAE
Distributable Earnings Definition
Beginning with our independent directors for services in all capacities provided to usAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017:

Name

 

Annual Fees

Paid in Cash(1)

Stock

Awards(2)

Total

Tanuja M. Dehne

 

$25,000.00

 

$49,998.00

 

$74,998.00

Martin A. Kamarck

 

$25,000.00

 

$49,998.00

 

$74,998.00

Stephen G. Kasnet

 

$37,500.00

 

$74,540.56

 

$112,040.56

W. Reid Sanders

 

$25,000.00

 

$49,998.00

 

$74,998.00

Hope B. Woodhouse

 

$25,000.00

 

$49,998.00

 

$74,998.00

(1)This column sets forth the cash fees paid by us during the year ended2020, and for all subsequent reporting periods ending on or after December 31, 2017.  The current term of each of the independent directors expires on the date of the 2018 Annual Meeting.

23



(2)The values in this column were computed2021, we have elected to present Distributable Earnings, a measure that is not prepared in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 andGAAP, as a supplemental method of evaluating our operating performance. Distributable Earnings replaces our prior presentation of Core Earnings with no changes to the definition. In order to maintain our status as a REIT, we are based on the closing market pricerequired to distribute at least 90% of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date of the stock award.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the memberstaxable income as dividends. Distributable Earnings is intended to serve as a general, though imperfect, proxy for our taxable income. As such, Distributable Earnings is considered a key indicator of our Compensation Committee or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committeeability to generate sufficient income to pay our common dividends, which is or has been employed by us. Nonethe primary focus of income-oriented investors who comprise a meaningful segment of our executive officers currently servesstockholder base. We believe providing Distributable Earnings on a supplemental basis to our net income (loss) and cash flow from operating activities, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of another entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board of Directors or our Compensation or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, except that in 2017 each of Messrs. Brian Taylor, Siering and Roth, each of whom are partners of Pine River, participated in making compensation decisions for officers and employees of Pine River and its affiliates.

Transactions with Related Persons

Management Agreement with Pine River Capital Management L.P.

We are party to a Management Agreement with Pine River Capital Management L.P., pursuant to which Pine River provides the day-to-day management of our business, including providing us with our executive officers and all other personnel necessary to support our operations. The Management Agreement requires Pine River to manage our business in conformity with the policies and the investment guidelines that are approved and monitored by our Board of Directors. The Management Agreement has an initial three-year term, which expires on June 28, 2020, and renews automatically for successive one-year terms unless earlier terminated by either us or Pine Riverdetermined in accordance with GAAP, is helpful to stockholders in assessing the terms thereof. Pine River is entitled to receive a termination fee from us under certain circumstances. In exchange for its services, we are obligated to pay Pine River a management fee as well as reimburse it for certain expenses incurred by it and its affiliates in rendering management services to us. Mr. Brian Taylor, our Chairman, is Chief Executive Officer and a Partner of Pine River. Messrs. Siering and Roth, membersoverall run-rate operating performance of our Boardbusiness.

We use Distributable Earnings to evaluate our performance, excluding the effects of Directors,certain transactions and GAAP adjustments we believe are partners of Pine River. Mr. John Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Urbaszek, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Mr. Alpart, our Chief Investment Officer, Mr. Plust, our Chief Operations Officer, and Ms. Sandberg, our Secretary and General Counsel, are each employees of Pine River.

We incurred charges of $8.5 million for year ended December 31, 2017 related to the Management Agreement, of which $6.3 million was for the base management fee and $2.2 million represented expense reimbursements for general and administrative expenses incurred by the company in the normal course of its operations and certain compensation expenses incurred by Pine River under the Management Agreement as described in greater detail below. No incentive fees were earned by or paid to Pine River during the year.

Under the Management Agreement, we pay Pine River a base management fee equal to 1.5% of equity on an annualized basis. For purposes of calculating the management fee, equity means the sum of the net proceeds from all issuancesnot necessarily indicative of our equity securities, plus cumulative “core earnings” at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter, less any distributions to stockholders, any amount paid to repurchase stock,current loan portfolio and any incentive fees earned by Pine River, but excluding the incentive fee earned in the current quarter. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, incentive fees, if earned, will be payable to Pine River.  The incentive fee will be the excess of (1) the product of (a) 20% and (b) the result of (i) “core earnings” for the previous 12-month period, minus (ii) the product of (A) equity in the previous 12-month

24



period, and (B) 8% per annum, less (2) the sum of any incentive fees paid to Pine River with respect to the first three calendar quarters of such previous 12-month period; provided, however, that no incentive fees are payable with respect to any calendar quarter unless “core earnings” for the 12 most recently completed calendar quarters in the aggregate is greater than zero.

operations. For purpose of calculating the base management and incentive fees, “core earnings” meansreporting purposes, we define Distributable Earnings as net income (loss) attributable to commonour stockholders, excludingcomputed in accordance with GAAP, excluding: (i) non-cash equity compensation expense, incentive fees earned by Pine River,expenses; (ii) depreciation and amortization,amortization; (iii) any unrealized gains or losses(losses) or other similar non-cash items that are included in net income (loss) for the applicable reporting period (regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss or in net income)income (loss) for such period); and (iv) certain non-cash items and one-time expenses. Distributable Earnings may also be adjusted from time to time for reporting purposes to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in U.S. GAAP and certain other material non-cash income or expense items in each case after discussions between Pine River and the independent members of our Board of Directors and approved by a majority of our independent directors.

As noted above, The exclusion of depreciation and amortization from the calculation of Distributable Earnings only applies to debt investments related to real estate to the extent we reimburse Pine River for (i) our allocable shareforeclose upon the property or properties underlying such debt investments.

While Distributable Earnings excludes the impact of the unrealized non-cash current provision for credit losses, we expect to only recognize such potential credit losses in Distributable Earnings if and when such amounts are deemed non-recoverable. This is generally at the time a loan is repaid, or in the case of foreclosure, when the underlying asset is sold, but non-recoverability may also be concluded if, in our determination, it is nearly certain that all amounts due will not be collected. The realized loss amount reflected in Distributable Earnings will equal the difference between the cash compensation paid by Pine Riverreceived, or expected to its employees servingbe received, and the carrying value of the asset, and is reflective of our economic experience as our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel and other employees of Pine River who provide services to us, including employees providing us with in-house legal, tax, accounting, consulting, auditing, administrative, information technology, computer programming and development and other back-office resources; and (ii) any amounts for employees of Pine River’s affiliates arising under a shared facilities and services agreement between Pine River and its affiliates.  In 2017, we reimbursed Pine River a total of $284,500 for compensation paid to employees of Pine River serving as our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel.  We do not reimburse Pine River for any expenses relatedit relates to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and other personnel who provide investment services to us.

Transactions with Significant Stockholders

As described in greater detail below under “Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent of Our Common Stock,” as of February 8, 2018, Goldman Sachs Asset Management reported that it was a beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock and, therefore, is considered a related party under SEC rules.  In 2017, prior to Goldman Sachs Asset Management becoming a related party, we entered into a Master Repurchase and Securities Contract Agreement and subsequent amendments with an affiliate of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.  This financing arrangement, pursuant to which we finance certain of our loans held for investment, was entered into on an arm’s-length basis.  As of December 31, 2017, we had an aggregate outstanding balance of approximately $253 million under this financing arrangement.

Related Person Transaction Policies

Our Audit Committee Charter requires our Audit Committee to review, approve and oversee any related party transactions involving our company and also authorizes such Committee to develop policies and procedures for its approval of related party transactions.

Our Management Agreement places restrictions on Pine River from entering into transactions with its related parties or providing services under the Management Agreement on terms that are no more favorable to Pine River or its affiliates than would be obtained from a third party on an arm’s-length basis, in any event unless approved by a majority of our independent directors.

25



STOCK OWNERSHIP

Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Director Nominees and Named Executive Officers

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “GPMT.” As of March 21, 2018, we had 353 registered holders and 64,486 beneficial owners of our common stock. The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 21, 2018 (unless otherwise indicated) by each of our executive officers, current directors and director nominees and all of such individuals as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3ultimate realization of the Exchange Act. A person is deemed to beloan.

During the beneficial owner of any shares of common stock if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to those shares or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days of the date of the table. “Voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)

 

Number of Shares

Beneficially Owned(2)

 

Percent of
Class
(2)

Directors and Director Nominees:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tanuja M. Dehne

 

3,564

 

*

Martin A. Kamarck

 

2,564

 

*

Stephen G. Kasnet(3)

 

17,319

 

*

William Roth

 

153,829

 

*

W. Reid Sanders

 

70,428

 

*

Thomas E. Siering(3)

 

185,482

 

*

Brian C. Taylor

 

23,014

 

*

John A. Taylor

 

195,862

 

*

Hope B. Woodhouse(3)

 

12,927

 

*

Officers:

 

 

 

 

Stephen Alpart

 

85,220

 

*

Steven Plust

 

83,213

 

*

Rebecca B. Sandberg

 

40,390

 

*

Marcin Urbaszek

 

38,711

 

*

All director nominees and executive officers as a group (13 individuals)

 

912,523

 

2.10%

 

 

 

 

 

*Represents ownership of less than 1.0% of our outstanding common stock as of March 21, 2018.

(1)The business address of each of the individuals is 590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(2)Based on 43,437,059 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 21, 2018. Our directors and named executive officers are prohibited from hedging company stock and from pledging company stock in any manner, whether as collateral for a loan, in a margin account held at a broker, or otherwise.

(3)Includes shares of common stock acquired by the reporting person in connection with the pro rata stock dividend by Two Harbors Investment Corp. to its stockholders on November 1, 2017; the dividend distribution was exempt from Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  pursuant to Rule16a-9 thereof.

26



Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent of Our Common Stock

Based on filings made under Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act, the persons known by us to be beneficial owners of five percent (5%) or more of our common stock were as follows:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Number of Shares

Beneficially Owned

 

Percent of
Class
(1)

The Vanguard Group(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

 

3,491,935

 

8.04%

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 

3,772,127

 

8.68%

Goldman Sachs Asset Management (4)

200 West Street

New York, NY 10282

 

3,119,531

 

7.18%

 

 

 

 

 

(1)Based on 43,437,059 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 21, 2018.

(2)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2018, by The Vanguard Group reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 47,072 shares, shared voting power with respect to 3,173 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,444,175 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 47,760 shares.

(3)Based on a Schedule 13G  filed with the SEC on February 1, 2018, by BlackRock, Inc. reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 3,684,349 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares reported.

(4)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 6, 2018, by Goldman Sachs Asset Management reporting that it has shared voting power with respect to 2,992,040 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to all shares reported, but does not hold sole voting power or sole dispositive power with respect to any of the shares reported.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and the disclosure requirements of Item 405 of SEC Regulation S-K require that our directors and executive officers, and any persons holding more than 10% of our common stock (“10% holders”), file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and 10% holders are required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us or written representations from reporting persons that all reportable transactions were reported, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, all reports required to be filed2023, we recorded provision for credit losses of $(104.8) million, which has been excluded from Distributable Earnings, consistent with other unrealized gains (losses) and other non-cash items pursuant to Section 16(a) by such executive officers, directorsour existing policy for reporting Distributable Earnings referenced above. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded $(3.4) million in depreciation and 10% holders were timely filed.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our directors are encouragedamortization on REO and related intangibles, which has been excluded from Distributable Earnings consistent with other unrealized gains (losses) and other non-cash items pursuant to own sharesour existing policy for reporting Distributable Earnings referenced above. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded a $0.2 million gain on early extinguishment of debt, which has been excluded from Distributable Earnings consistent with certain one-time events pursuant to our existing policy for reporting Distributable Earnings as a helpful indicator in assessing the overall run-rate operating performance of our common stockbusiness.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded $(54.3) million of realized losses on loan investments consisting of:(i) a $(33.3) million realized loss representing a write-off of an allowance for credit losses related to the resolution of a loan secured by an office property located in orderSan Diego, CA, (ii) a $(16.8) million realized loss representing a write-off of an allowance for credit losses related to better align their personal interests with the intereststransfer to loans held-for-sale of a loan secured by an office property located in Dallas, TX, and (iii) a $(4.2) million realized loss representing a write-off of an allowance for credit losses related to the transfer to REO of a loan secured by an office property located in Phoenix, AZ. These realized losses have been included in Distributable Earnings pursuant to our existing policy for reporting Distributable Earnings referenced above.
82 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures
Distributable Earnings does not represent net income (loss) or cash flow from operating activities and should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income (loss), or an indication of our stockholders. In furtherance of this objective, our directors stock ownership guidelines require each director to own at least $200,000 in sharesGAAP cash flows from operations, a measure of our liquidity, or an indication of funds available for our cash needs. In addition, our methodology for calculating Distributable Earnings may differ from the methodologies employed by other companies to calculate the same or similar supplemental performance measures, and, accordingly, our reported Distributable Earnings may not be comparable to the Distributable Earnings reported by other companies.
Distributable Earnings before realized losses: We believe it is useful to our stockholders to present Distributable Earnings before realized losses to reflect our run-rate operating results as (i) our operating results are mainly comprised of net interest income earned on our loan investments net of our operating expenses, which comprise our ongoing operations, (ii) it helps our stockholders in assessing the overall run-rate operating performance of our business, and (iii) it has been a useful reference related to our common stock within five yearsdividend as it is one of being elected tothe factors we and our Board of Directors consider when declaring the dividend. We believe that our stockholders use Distributable Earnings and thereafter so long as such person continuesDistributable Earnings before realized losses, or a comparable supplemental performance measure, to serve as a director. Common stock granted in respect of annual director fees are counted toward achieving these stock ownership guidelines.

27



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive Officers

Our Board of Directors generally appoints our executive officers annually following our annual meeting of stockholders to serve one year terms. Set forth below is information about each of our named executive officers.

John A. (“Jack”) Taylor

Age: 62

Background: Mr. Taylor is our President and Chief Executive Officer. Biographical information for Mr. Taylor is provided above under “Proposal 1: Election of Directors – Director Nominees.

Stephen Alpart

Age: 54

Background: Mr. Alpart is our Chief Investment Officer and has served in that role since our inception. He has also served as a Managing Director and a member of the Investment Committee of Pine River’s Commercial Real Estate Group since November 2014. Before joining Pine River, he was Managing Director in Prudential’s Global Real Estate Finance Group, focused on the United States from 2009 to 2014. Previously, he was a Managing Director in the Real Estate Groups at PaineWebber and UBS, where he focused on originating, underwriting and closing large structured commercial real estate loans for private equity firms and owner/operators. He has worked in real estate finance and debt investing for over 20 years in a variety of functions including third-party funds management, proprietary on-book lending, transaction advisory business, loan syndications and loan sales, and workouts/restructurings. Mr. Alpart received a Master’s in Business Administration, Finance and Real Estate from New York University and a B.S. in Business Administration, Accounting and Economics from Washington University.

Steven Plust

Age: 59

Background: Mr. Plust is our Chief Operating Officer on has served in that role since our inception. He has also served as a Managing Director and a member of the Investment Committee of Pine River’s Commercial Real Estate Group since November 2014. Prior to joining Pine River, Mr. Plust was a Managing Director in Prudential’s Global Real Estate Finance Group from 2009 to 2014. He has over 25 years of experience in real estate finance and capital markets, and was an advisor to the Resolution Trust Corporation in the development and implementation of its securitization programs.  Mr. Plust has worked for over 20 years in principal investing platforms on Wall Street and in investment management, where he has been primarily responsible for transaction pricing and structuring, credit risk assessment, and analysis of complex transactions and multi-asset portfolios. He received a Master’s in Business Administration from Columbia University and a B.S. in Chemistry from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

28



Marcin Urbaszek

Age: 42

Background: Mr. Urbaszek is our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and has served in those roles since our inception. He joined Pine River in May 2013 and until the formation of our company, served as a Managing Director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. focusing on strategy, corporate development and capital markets activities. Prior to joining Pine River, Mr. Urbaszek worked at Credit Suisse in the Financial Institutions Group, Investment Banking, serving in various capacities from 2006 to April 2013, most recently as a team lead and partner on coverage and strategic transaction execution for residential and commercial mortgage companies, banks and other specialty consumer and commercial lenders. He has over 16 years of experience in various areas of finance including corporate finance, capital markets, and equity research, with the last 12 years dedicated to financial institutions. Over the course of his career, Mr. Urbaszek has been primarily responsible for transaction advisory, structuring, negotiation and execution, as well as financial planning and analysis. Mr. Urbaszek received a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance with a Minor focused on Financial Accounting & Economics from Zicklin School of Business, Bernard M. Baruch College, CUNY. Mr. Urbaszek is a CFA Charterholder.

Rebecca B. Sandberg

Age: 46

Background: Ms. Sandberg is our Secretary and General Counsel and has served in that role since our inception. Ms. Sandberg also serves as the General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO), a position she has held since March 2013. Ms. Sandberg served as Deputy General Counsel and Secretary of Two Harbors beginning in May 2012, and from 2010 to May 2012, she served as Senior Counsel to Two Harbors. Prior to joining Two Harbors, Ms. Sandberg was in the private practice of law where she advised clients of all sizes primarily in the areas of federal and state securities laws, mergers and acquisitions, public and private capital markets transactions, corporate governance and general corporate law.  From 2007 to 2010, Ms. Sandberg was a Senior Associate at Stoel Rives LLP and from 2006 to 2007 she was a Senior Associate at Fulbright & Jaworski LLP. Prior to that, Ms. Sandberg was an Associate at Lindquist & Vennum PLLP. She received a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Minnesota and a Juris Doctorate from William Mitchell College of Law.

29



Executive Compensation Overview

As described more fully above underevaluate and compare the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Transactions with Related Persons – Management Agreement with Pine River Capital Management L.P.,” we are externally managed by  Pine River Capital Management L.P. (“Pine River”) under the terms of a Management Agreement, pursuant to which Pine River provides us with all of the personnel required to manage and operate our business, including our named executive officers, each of whom is an employee of an affiliate of Pine River. Accordingly, as discussed below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the cash compensation received by our named executive officers is paid by Pine River. Any equity incentive compensation awarded to our named executive officers is the responsibility of our Compensation Committee and is determined by our Compensation Committee in accordance with our Equity Incentive Plan.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This compensation discussion and analysis describes our compensation objectives and policies in relation to compensation received by our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Executive Compensation Overview; Management Agreement

As described more fully above under the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Transactions with Related Persons – Management Agreement with Pine River,” we are externally managed by Pine River under the terms of a Management Agreement. As an externally managed company with no employees of our own, we rely on our external manager to provide us with the employees we need to operate our business.

Under the Management Agreement, Pine River is responsible for managing our assets and the day-to-day operationsperformance of our company including, among other things:

·investigating, analyzing and selecting possible investment opportunities;

·conducting negotiationsour peers.

“Core” ROAE Definition
“Core” ROAE is calculated as the ratio of (i) our Company’s Distributable Earnings generated during the performance period to (ii) our Company’s average common stockholders’ equity during the performance period, as measured on each of the first and last day of the period. For these purposes, Distributable Earnings are as reported in our Company’s publicly filed financial reports, excluding the effects of certain non-cash items and one-time charges that we believe are not indicative of our Company’s overall operating performance.
“Run-Rate” ROAE Definition
“Run-rate” ROAE is calculated as the ratio of (i) our Company’s Distributable Earnings generated during the performance period, excluding realized losses or realized gains related to credit events, asset acquisitions;

·negotiatingsales and entering into financing agreements;

·managing and supervising third party vendors and contractors, including lawyers and auditors;

·providing executive and administrative personnel, office space and office services;

·maintaining a financial accounting and reporting function,similar developments within our Company’s portfolio or borrowings, to (ii) our Company’s average common stockholders’ equity during the activities of which include monitoring compliance with REIT and 1940 Act tests;

·providing a legal and regulatory compliance function;

·providing investor relations services; and

·providing and maintaining computer and technology resources.

Additionally, Pine River is responsible for providing us with allperformance period, as measured on each of the personnel required to managefirst and operatelast day of the period. For these purposes, Distributable Earnings are as reported in our business, including our named executive officers, eachCompany’s publicly filed financial reports, excluding the effects of whom is an employee of an affiliate of Pine River. Pine River recognizescertain non-cash items and one-time charges that providing a talented and motivated workforce is critical to the successwe believe are not indicative of our businessCompany’s overall operating performance.

GAAP Reconciliation
The following table provides a reconciliation of GAAP net (loss) to common stockholders to Distributable Earnings before realized losses, Distributable (Loss) Earnings, “Core” ROAE and is committed to compensation practices designed to effectively attract, retain and motivate key personnel. Our Compensation Committee, which consists entirely of independent

30



directors, discusses with Pine River the compensation philosophy of Pine River and its affiliates to understand the extent to which such philosophy affects the performance, retention, incentives and risk-taking of the named executive officers and other personnel supporting our business. This interaction between our Compensation Committee and Pine River helps ensure that the Committee can assess whether the compensation practices of Pine River promote the long-term best interests of our business and our stockholders.

As compensation for the services provided under the Management Agreement, we pay Pine River a base management fee and reimburse it for certain expenses incurred in the course of rendering such services. The based management fee is a fixed fee that we pay to Pine River on a quarterly basis.  Additionally, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, Pine River is eligible to earn incentive fees if the company achieves certain performance criteria, as further described in the Management Agreement. We disclose the amount of the base management fee, expense reimbursements and incentive fees, if any, to stockholders in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Reports on Form 10-K that we file with the SEC.  As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, our payments to Pine River included base management fees of $6.3 million, and expense reimbursements of $2.2 million,“Run-Rate” ROAE for the year ended December 31, 2017. We did2023:

2024 PROXY STATEMENT / 83

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix – Definitions and Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures
($ in millions, except per share data)2023
GAAP Net (Loss)$(77.6)
Adjustments:
Provision for Credit Losses$104.8
Depreciation and amortization on real estate owned$3.4
(Gain) Loss on Extinguishment of Debt$(0.2)
Non-Cash Equity Compensation$7.0
Distributable Earnings before realized losses (G)(1)
$37.3
Realized losses on write-offs, loan sales and REO conversions$(54.3)
Distributable (Loss) Earnings (H)$(17.0)
Basic Wtd. Avg. Common Shares51,641,619
Distributable (Loss) Earnings Per Basic Share$(0.33)
Distributable Earnings before realized losses Per Basic Share$0.72
Average Common stockholders’ equity (I = (A+B)/2)$716
“Run-Rate” ROAE (J = G/I)5.2%
“Core” ROAE (K = H/I)(2.4)%
(1)
Due to rounding, figures may not pay any incentive fees to Pine River in 2017.  Given Pine River’s critical role with respect to our business, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Board of Directors to oversee our relationship with Pine River and all compensation paid to Pine River is reviewed by the Compensation Committee on at least an annual basis. The base management and incentive fees cannot be increased or revised without the approval of our independent directors. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Transactions with Related Persons – Management Agreement with Pine River LLC” for further discussion of the terms of the Management Agreement, including the base management and incentive fees payable to Pine River thereunder and our expense reimbursement obligations to Pine River.

Compensation Program

As an externally managed company with no employees, we utilize a hybrid approach to the compensation program for our named executive officers. Pine River is responsible under the Management Agreement for all cash compensation paid to our named executive officers. Equity incentive compensation that may be awarded to our named executive officers from time to time is the responsibility of our company and is determined by our Compensation Committee in accordance with our Equity Incentive Plan. As described in more detailresult in the following sections, we believe thattotal presented

84 / gpmtreit.com/investors

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Detach Here
 —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — 
GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
RESERVATION REQUEST FORM
If you wish to attend the terms of the Management Agreement and the utilization our Equity Incentive Plan effectively align the interests of Pine River with those of our business, our named executive officers and, most importantly, our stockholders.

Cash Compensation

We do not pay any cash compensation to our named executive officers or to any other employees of Pine River who support our business. Pine River is responsible for all such cash compensation and for making decisions relating thereto based on such factors as Pine River determines appropriate. However, Pine River takes into consideration the company’s interests in hiring and retaining qualified personnel to operate our business and discusses its compensation philosophy with the Compensation Committee to enable the Committee to understand and assess the extent to which such philosophy affects the incentives and risk-taking of the named executive officers and other personnel supporting our business.  Additionally, our Compensation Committee reviews the cash compensation paid by Pine River to our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel, which includes salaries and performance-based bonuses; we reimburse Pine River for our allocable share of such amounts based on the amount of time that such individuals devote to our business.  We do not reimburse Pine River for any cash compensation paid by Pine River to the individuals serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief

31



Investment Officer, as those amounts are borne entirely by Pine River in accordance with the Management Agreement.

Our Management Agreement with Pine River does not require that any specified amount or percentage of the management fees we pay to Pine River be allocated to our named executive officers. However, we estimate that the aggregate cash compensation paid to our named executive officers that may reasonably be associated with their management of our company for the period beginning June 28, 2017 and ending December 31, 2017 totaled $730,000 for the period. This aggregate amount represents approximately 8.6% of the $8.5 million in total management fees and reimbursements paid by us to Pine River for the same period of time in 2017. Of the aggregate cash compensation paid by Pine River to our named executive officers in 2017 that was reasonably associated with their management of our company, 100% represented fixed compensation (e.g., salaries).

Equity Incentive Compensation

Our Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, is responsible for overseeing the equity incentive component of our compensation program, and approves and recommends all equity awards granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan, which awards are then ratified by our Board of Directors.

The equity compensation paid to our named executive officers is intended to drive and reward corporate performance annually and over the long term. In developing our equity compensation program, we intend to design a program that reflects strong governance practices and the best interests of our stockholders, while striving to meet the following core objectives:

·Pay for Performance – We intend to develop an equity compensation program that is designed to generate and reward superior individual and collective performance by ensuring that equity compensation is commensurate with the level of achieved company results.

·Hire and Retain a Strong Team of Professionals – We operate in a highly competitive industry, and our continued success depends on retaining our talented executive team. We intend to develop an equity compensation program that will assist us in attracting and retaining highly qualified executives whose abilities and expertise are critical to our long-term success and our competitive advantage. We believe our success over the long term will create opportunities for our named executive officers through their common stock ownership by enabling them to participate in any future appreciation of our common stock and receive dividends.

·Align Risk and Reward – We are committed to creating an environment that encourages increased profitability for our company without undue risk taking. We strive to focus our executive officers’ decisions on goals that are consistent with our overall business strategy without threatening the long-term viability of our company.

·Align Interests with Stockholders – We are committed to using our equity compensation program to increase executive stock ownership over the long term and focus our named executive officers’ attention on creating value for our stockholders. We believe that equity ownership directly aligns the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders and encourages our named executive officers to focus on creating long-term stockholder value. Accordingly, our named executive officers are prohibited from hedging company stock.

Restricted stock awards that are granted to our named executive officers under our Equity Incentive Plan provide for ratable vesting on an annual basis over a three-year period, with accelerated vesting occurring under certain circumstances, as described in greater detail below under “Potential Payments

32



Upon Termination or Change in Control.” Under certain circumstances, our named executive officers may be required to forfeit their restricted stock awards pursuant to Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, applicable stock exchange listing rules, or any clawback or recoupment policy adopted by our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. The restricted stock awards are treated as issued and outstanding as of the grant date and each named executive officer is entitled to vote the shares and receive dividends as declared and paid thereon; however, the restricted stock remains subject to forfeiture if the executive officer does not comply with the terms of the award agreement, including if the executive officer voluntarily terminates employment with our external manager prior to any applicable vesting dates.

In connection with our initial public offering and formation transaction in June 2017 (“IPO”), our Board of Directors approved the grant of an aggregate amount of 141,250 shares of restricted common stock (the “2017 IPO Awards”) under our Equity Incentive Plan to our named executive officers, which awards are set forth in greater detail below under “Grants of Plan-Based Awards.” The 2017 IPO Awards were granted to our named executive officers in recognition of our successful IPO and to align the interests of our newly appointed executives with our new stockholder base.  Because we are a newly formed company, we did not issue any other stock awards to our executive officers in 2017.

We do not have an equity compensation program in place that establishes a fixed schedule for granting restricted stock awards to our named executive officers.  Rather, our Compensation Committee has sole discretion to determine whether to approve any equity awards in future periods and will depend on a number of factors, including our company’s performance, expense implications, market and industry trends, peer practices, or other considerations that the Compensation Committee deems relevant.

Role of Compensation Consultant in Compensation Decisions

In 2017, our Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent compensation consultant to provide advice and guidance in developing a long-term equity incentive program that would be available for the Committee in contemplating future restricted stock awards for our named executive officers and other key personnel or other compensation matters, such as compensation for independent directors. Pay Governance does not provide services to our company other than the advice provided to our Compensation Committee, and Pay Governance had advised our Compensation Committee that the fees and direct expenses it received from us during 2017 were immaterial as a percentage of their respective incomes for the period. Pay Governance has also advised us that neither they nor, to their knowledge, any member of their consulting team who served or are serving our Compensation Committee owns any shares of our common stock. After considering the foregoing, as well as Pay Governance’s conflict of interest policies and procedures and the lack of known business and personal relationships between Pay Governance, its team members servicing our Compensation Committee and its members, and our named executive officers, our Compensation Committee concluded that the provision of services to the Committee by Pay Governance does not raise any conflict of interest concerns.

Role of Named Executive Officers in Equity-Based Compensation Decisions

Other than the 2017 IPO Awards, our Compensation Committee is responsible for making all equity-based compensation decisions related to our named executive officers. Our Compensation Committee will consider input from Mr. Taylor, our Chief Executive Officer, regarding the equity compensation and performance of named executive officers other than himself, including recommendations as to the equity compensation levels that he believes are commensurate with an individual’s job performance, skills, experience, qualifications and criticality to our company, as well as with our compensation philosophy, external market data and considerations of internal equity. Mr. Taylor regularly attends meetings of our

33



Compensation Committee, except when our Compensation Committee is meeting in executive session. Our Compensation Committee will communicate its views and decisions regarding equity compensation arrangements for our named executive officers to Mr. Taylor, who is generally responsible for implementing such arrangements.

Tax Treatment of Compensation

Section 162(m) disallows a federal income tax deduction for any publicly held corporation with respect to individual compensation exceeding $1 million in any taxable year paid to a corporation’s chief executive officer and certain other executive officers; beginning in 2018, pursuant to a change to Section 162(m), this limitation generally applies to payments made to employees or former employees who held those positions at any time beginning in 2017. The changes to Section 162(m) also greatly restrict the ability to design compensation for these officers in a way to ensure its deductibility. Because we do not have any employees and, therefore, do not take any federal income tax deductions, we do not believe that Section 162(m) has been or is currently applicable to us; accordingly, we do not currently consider the effects of Section 162(m) on the compensation paid to our named executive officers by our external manager or the degree to which it would be advisable to structure the amount and form of equity compensation to our named executive officers so as to maximize our ability to deduct it.  If we were to determine that Section 162(m) was applicable to us, our Compensation Committee retains the discretion to provide compensation in an amount or form that would not be deductible under Section 162(m) in circumstances under which it believes the exercise of such discretion would be in the best interest of our company.

Our Equity Incentive Plan provides that, with respect to awards intended to qualify for relief from the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum number of shares that may underlie awards over any three-year period to any eligible person may not exceed 1,500,000 as options and 600,000 as other grants. If we were subject to Section 162(m) these limitations on awards would be required under prior Section 162(m) to qualify for deduction of payments to certain officers to settle the awards. As indicated above, management does not believe that Section 162(m) is applicable to us and, moreover, these limitations on awards no longer qualify payments of the awards for deduction; therefore, management does not currently consider and has not previously considered such restrictions in connection with the granting of prior awards.

Compensation Risk Assessment

We intend to develop compensation policies and practices that are aligned with the interests of our stockholders and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. We do not believe that our fee arrangement with Pine River or the equity awards granted by us to our named executive officers encourages inappropriate risk taking by our named executive officers.

As noted above, we are externally managed by Pine River pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement and all decisions regarding cash compensation paid to our named executive officers are made by Pine River. The cash compensation paid by Pine River to our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel for the period from June 28, 2017 through December 31, 2017 represents salaries for services provided to our company; we reimburse Pine River for our allocable share of such amounts based on the amount of time that such individuals devote to our business.  We do not reimburse Pine River for any cash compensation paid by Pine River to the individuals serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer, as those amounts are borne entirely by Pine River in accordance with the Management Agreement.

In connection with our IPO in June 2017, the Board of Directors approved the grant of the 2017 IPO Awards to our named executive officers under the terms of our Equity Incentive Plan.  The 2017 IPO

34



Awards provide for ratable vesting over a three-year period, with accelerated vesting occurring under certain circumstances, as described in greater detail below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”  We expect any future restricted stock awards granted to our executive officers to provide for similar vesting restrictions.  We believe that the vesting restrictions are an important retention device and encourage our named executive officers to focus on sustaining our company’s long-term performance and delivering total return to our stockholders rather than encouraging decisions that result in a short-term benefit for our company.

Employment Agreements

We are externally managed by Pine River and have no employees.  Accordingly, we do not have any employment agreements with any of our named executive officers.

Pension Benefits or Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not provide any of our named executive officers with pension benefits or nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the equity compensation paid to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017(1):

Name and Principal Position

Year

 

Restricted
Stock
Awards
(2)

All Other
Compensation
(3)

Total(4)

John A. Taylor,

President and Chief Executive Officer

2017

$1,516,125

$24,880

$1,541,005

Stephen Alpart,

Chief Investment Officer

2017

$390,000

$6,400

$396,400

Steven Plust

Chief Operating Officer

2017

$390,000

$6,400

$396,400

Marcin Urbaszek,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

2017

$263,250

$4,320

$267,570

Rebecca B. Sandberg,

Secretary and General Counsel

2017

$195,000

$3,200

$198,200


(1)The company commenced operations on June 28, 2017 following the consummation of its IPO and Formation Transaction.  Accordingly, no information is presented for fiscal years ending December 31, 2015 and 2016.

(2)See also “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below. The shares of restricted stock were granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan and will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as the named executive officer complies with the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement. The values in this column represent the fair value of the restricted stock awards on the grant date, which was June 22, 2017.

(3)All Other Compensation paid during 2017 represents dividends on unvested shares of restricted common stock payable in 2017.

35



(4)Because we do not pay cash compensation to our named executive officers, any such compensation paid to our named executive officers by Pine River is not included in this Summary Compensation Table. See “Cash Compensation” above for information regarding cash compensation paid by Pine River.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

We adopted our Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by our stockholder on June 14, 2017, to provide incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified directors, officers, advisers, consultants and other personnel, including Pine River, its affiliates and employees of Pine River and its affiliates. Our Equity Incentive Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee and permits grants of restricted common stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity awards. Our Compensation Committee is authorized to issue up to 3,242,306 shares of our common stock pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2017, 3,078,203 shares of our common stock remained available for future issuance pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan.

The following table summarizes each equity award granted to our named executive officers pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017(1):

Name

 

Grant
Date

 

 

All Other Stock Awards:

Number of Shares(2)

 

Grant Date Fair Value

of Stock Awards(3)

John A. Taylor

 

06/22/2017

 

77,750

 

$1,516,125

Stephen Alpart

 

06/22/2017

 

20,000

 

$390,000

Steven Plust

 

06/22/2017

 

20,000

 

$390,000

Marcin Urbaszek

 

06/22/2017

 

13,500

 

$263,250

Rebecca B. Sandberg

 

06/22/2017

 

10,000

 

$195,000


(1)The company commenced operations on June 28, 2017 following the consummation of its IPO and Formation Transaction.  Accordingly, no information is presented for fiscal years ending December 31, 2015 and 2016.

(2)See also “Summary Compensation Table” above. The shares of restricted stock were granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan and will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as the named executive officer complies with the terms and conditions of his or her restricted stock award agreement.

(3)The values in this column are based on the $19.50 issuance price of our common stock established for our IPO, which represents the value attributed to the restricted stock awards for the June 22, 2017 grant date.

36



Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information concerning unvested restricted stock awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2017(1).

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Grant
Date

 

Number of Shares or
Units of Stock Not Yet
Vested
(2)

 

Market Value of Shares
or Units of Stock Not
Yet Vested
(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John A. Taylor

 

6/22/2017

 

77,750

 

$1,379,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stephen Alpart

 

6/22/2017

 

20,000

 

$354,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven Plust

 

6/22/2017

 

20,000

 

$354,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marcin Urbaszek

 

6/22/2017

 

13,500

 

$239,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rebecca B. Sandberg

 

6/22/2017

 

10,000

 

$177,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)The company commenced operations on June 28, 2017 following the consummation of its IPO and Formation Transaction.  Accordingly, no information is presented for fiscal years ending December 31, 2015 and 2016.

(2)The shares of restricted stock were granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan and will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as the named executive officer complies with the terms and conditions of his or her restricted stock award agreement.

(3)The values in this column are based on the $17.74 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2017, which was the last trading day of the year.

Stock Vested in 2017

The company first issued restricted stock awards in June of 2017 with ratable three-year vesting restrictions.  Accordingly, no shares of restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Our Equity Incentive Plan and the restricted stock award agreements with our named executive officers provide for accelerated vesting of any unvested restricted stock awards in the event of termination of service without cause or due to death, disability or retirement and, potentially, in connection with a change in control of our company. The following table sets forth estimates of the potential benefits to our named executive officers in connection with such circumstances, assuming such event occurred on December 31, 2017 and assuming our Compensation Committee exercised its

37



discretion to accelerate vesting of unvested restricted stock awards upon a change in control. The actual payments due upon the occurrence of certain events could materially differ from the estimates provided in the table if such events occur on a different date.

Name

Value of Vesting
Restricted Stock(1)

$1,379,285

John A. Taylor

$354,800

Stephen Alpart

$354,800

Steven Plust

$239,490

Marcin Urbaszek

$177,400

Rebecca B. Sandberg


(1)Comprised of all outstanding shares of restricted stock held by such named executive officer that had not vested as of December 31, 2017. The values in this column are based on the $17.74 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2017, which was the last trading day of the year.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviewed and discussed with management of the company the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” contained in this proxy statement. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in the company’s proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

By the Compensation Committee:

Martin A. Kamarck, Chairman

Tanuja M. Dehne

W. Reid Sanders

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

The SEC issued final rules implementing the provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that require U.S. publicly-traded companies to disclose in their proxy statement filed beginning in 2018 the ratio of their chief executive officer’s compensation to that of their median employee.  Because the company has no employees, disclosure pursuant to such rules is not included in this proxy statement.

38



PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The SEC adopted rules pursuant to Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act that require public companies to provide stockholders with periodic advisory (non-binding) votes on executive compensation, also referred to as “say-on-pay” proposals.

As more fully described under the sections of this proxy statement entitled “Executive Officers” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” we are externally managed by Pine River pursuant a Management Agreement and, consequently, we do not have any employees and have not paid any cash compensation directly to any of our named executive officers. Each named executive officer’s compensation is comprised of cash compensation paid to them directly by  Pine River and equity awards granted by our company pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan. The amount of cash compensation paid to each named executive officer is determined by and is the responsibility of Pine River and the amount of the equity awards granted to each named executive officer is determined by our Compensation Committee. For more information regarding our executive compensation, please see “Executive Officers” above.

Accordingly, we are asking you to vote “FOR” the adoption of the following resolution:

RESOLVED: That the stockholders of the company approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to the company’s executive officers, as disclosed in the company’s proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related narrative discussions in the proxy statement.”

Because this say-on-pay vote is advisory in nature, it is not binding on us, our Board of Directors, our Compensation Committee, or Pine River. Our Board of Directors has determined that our company will hold an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis. We currently expect to conduct our next advisory vote on executive compensation at our next annual meeting of stockholders in May 2019, though we will take into consideration the outcome of the advisory vote under Proposal 3 of this proxy statement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY VOTE RELATED TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing our stockholders with an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, such as that provided for in Proposal 2 of this proxy statement. This non-binding advisory vote is commonly referred to as a “say on frequency” vote. Under this proposal, stockholders may vote to have the company hold an advisory vote on executive compensation: (i) every year; (ii) every two years; or (iii) every three years. The option that receives the highest number of votes cast will reflect the frequency for future say-on-pay votes that has been selected by our stockholders.

This vote on the frequency of future advisory votes relating to executive compensation is advisory in nature and is not binding on us, our Board of Directors, our Compensation Committee, or Pine River.

39



However, our Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions expressed by our stockholders in their vote on this proposal, and expect to take into account the outcome of this vote when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on our executive compensation.

While we will continue to monitor developments in this area, our Board believes that a say-on-pay vote should be conducted every year so that our stockholders may express their views on our executive compensation program and our Compensation Committee can consider the outcome of these votes in making its decisions on executive compensation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR A FREQUENCY OF “EVERY YEAR” WITH RESPECT TO THE SAY-ON-PAY VOTE.

PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, our Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by our Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, our Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our company. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT AND AUDITOR FEES

Audit Committee Report

The Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee presently composed of independent directors Stephen G. Kasnet, W. Reid Sanders, and Hope B. Woodhouse. Mr. Kasnet serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Each of the directors on our Audit Committee is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Kasnet and Ms. Woodhouse satisfies the definition of financial sophistication and is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC.

The Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight as set forth in its charter, which is available on our website at www.gpmortgagetrust.com. It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to prepare our financial statements, to plan or conduct audits or to determine that our financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and for maintaining internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the financial statements and for expressing an opinion as to whether those audited financial statements fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

40



The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements with management and with Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.

The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB.

The Audit Committee has received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed Ernst & Young LLP’s independence with Ernst & Young LLP.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee also has recommended the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.

By the Audit Committee:

Stephen G. Kasnet, Chairman

W. Reid Sanders

Hope B. Woodhouse

Use of Audit Committee Report

In accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable law or regulation, the information contained in the foregoing Report of the Audit Committee is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Exchange Act.

41



Auditor Fees

We retained Ernst & Young LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. We also retained Ernst & Young LLP, as well as other accounting and consulting firms, to provide various other services in 2017.

The table below presents the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended December 31, 2017:

 

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit fees(1)

 

$

 798,920

 

$

 __

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit-related fees(2)

 

__

 

__

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax fees(3)

 

107,150

 

17,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total principal accountant fees

 

$

 906,070

 

$

 17,311

 

 

 

 

 


*

Our company commenced operations on June 28, 2017; historical tax fees presented for fiscal year ended 2016 in this table and in our consolidated financial statements filed with the SEC reflect fees incurred by our predecessor, Two Harbors Investment Corp. while it owned the commercial real estate lending subsidiary we acquired in our formation transaction in June 2017.

(1)

Audit fees pertain to the audit of our annual Consolidated Financial Statements, including review of the interim financial statements contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters to underwriters in connection with our registration statements and common stock offerings, attest services, consents to the incorporation of the Ernst & Young LLP audit report in publicly filed documents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2)

Audit-related fees pertain to assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the principal accountant, including accounting consultations and audits in connection with proposed or consummated acquisitions, internal control reviews and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standard.

(3)

Tax fees pertain to services performed for tax compliance, including REIT compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including preparation of tax returns and claims for refund and tax-payment planning services. Tax planning and advice also includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, and tax advice related to specific transactions.

Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy

The services performed by Ernst & Young LLP in 2017 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. This policy requires that all engagement fees and the terms and scope of all auditing and non-auditing services be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in advance of their formal initiation.

42



OTHER MATTERS

Meeting Matters

Our Board of Directors does not intend to bring other matters before the Annual Meeting except items incident to the conduct of the meeting. However, on all matters properly brought before the meeting by our Board of Directors or others, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy, or their substitutes, will vote on such matters in their discretion to the extent permitted by law.

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2019 Annual Meeting

Our 2019 annual meeting is expected to be held on or about May 14, 2019. If a stockholder intends to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the stockholder proposal must be received by the Secretarywebcast of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor,’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) at the offices of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (located at One Manhattan West, New York, New York 10022, on or before November 27, 2018. If such proposal is in compliance with all of10001), you must complete the requirements of Rule 14a-8 underfollowing information and return the Exchange Act, the proposal will be included in our proxy statement and proxy card relating to such meeting. We suggest such proposals be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require us to include any stockholder proposal that does not meet all the requirements for such inclusion established by the SEC in effect at that time.

Stockholders may (outside of Rule 14a-8) nominate candidates for election to the Board of Directors or propose business for consideration at our 2019 annual meeting under Maryland law and our Bylaws. Our Bylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our Board of Directors and the proposal of other business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting; (ii) by or at the direction of our Board of Directors; or (iii) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the notice required by our Bylaws and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions set forth in our Bylaws. Under our Bylaws, notice of such a nomination or proposal of other business must generally be provided to the Secretary not earlier than the 150th day nor later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. In addition, any such nomination or proposal must include the information required by our Bylaws. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or such a proposal at our 2019 annual Meeting of Stockholders must notify us in writing of such proposal by November 27, 2018, but in no event earlier than October 28, 2018.

Annual Report

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder, without charge, upon written requestform to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 590 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor,Michael J. Karber, General Counsel and Secretary, 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10022. You also10036. Please note that no members of management or our Board will be in attendance at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP’s offices and you will not have the ability to vote your shares from that location. This form must be received by Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. no later than June 4, 2024.

Your name and address:    
   
   
   
   
Number of shares of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. common stock you hold:
Please note that if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee (i.e., in street name), you may obtain our Annual Report on Form 10-K onbe able to authorize your proxy by telephone or the Internet, atas well as by mail. You should follow the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov,instructions you receive from your bank, broker or on our website at www.gpmortgagetrust.com. Our 2017 Annual Report, which contains information about our business, but is not part of our disclosure deemedother nominee to vote these shares. Also, if you hold your shares in street name, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from your bank, broker or nominee to be filed withable to vote via the SEC, is also available on our website at www.gpmortgagetrust.com.

43

Annual Meeting webcast. If the shares listed above are not registered in your name, identify the name of the registered stockholder below and include evidence that you beneficially own the shares.

Record stockholder:

   (name of your bank, broker or other nominee)
THIS IS NOT A PROXY CARD
 —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

*** Exercise Your Right to Vote *** Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 15, 2018.

[MISSING IMAGE: cv_obc-4c.jpg]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: px_24graniteproxy01pg01-bw.jpg]
GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. You are receiving this communication because you hold shares in the company named above. This is not a ballot. You cannot use this notice to vote these shares. This communication presents only an overview of GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. 590 MADISON AVENUE, 38TH FLOOR NEW3 BRYANT PARK, SUITE 2400ANEW YORK, NY 10022 the more complete proxy materials that are available10036SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTEVOTE BY INTERNETBefore The Meeting — Go to you on the Internet. You may view the proxy materials online at www.proxyvote.com or easily request a paper copy (see reverse side). We encourage you to access and review all ofscan the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. proxy materials and voting instructions. E43096-P05202 See the reverse side of this notice to obtain Meeting Information Meeting Type:Annual Meeting For holders as of:March 21, 2018 Date: May 15, 2018Time: 9:00 AM EDT Location: Loews Regency Hotel 540 Park Avenue New York, NY 10065


Before You Vote How to Access the Proxy Materials Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the by the arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the following page) in the subject line. How To Vote Please Choose One of the Following Voting Methods marked by the arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the following page) available and follow the instructions. E43097-P05202 Vote In Person: Many stockholder meetings have attendance requirements including, but not limited to, the possession of an attendance ticket issued by the entity holding the meeting. Please check the meeting materials for any special requirements for meeting attendance. At the meeting, you will need to request a ballot to vote these shares. Vote By Internet: To vote now by Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com. Have the information that is printed in the box Vote By Mail: You can vote by mail by requesting a paper copy of the materials, which will include a proxy card. Proxy Materials Available to VIEW or RECEIVE: NOTICE AND PROXY STATEMENTANNUAL REPORT How to View Online: following page) and visit: www.proxyvote .com. How to Request and Receive a PAPER or E-MAIL Copy: If you want to receive a paper or e-mail copy of these documents, you must request one. There is NO charge for requesting a copy. Please choose one of the following methods to make your request: 1) BY INTERNET:www.proxyvote.com 2) BY TELEPHONE: 1-800-579-1639 3) BY E-MAIL*:sendmaterial@proxyvote.com * If requesting materials by e-mail, please send a blank e-mail with the information that is printed in the box marked Requests, instructions and other inquiries sent to this e-mail address will NOT be forwarded to your investment advisor. Please make the request as instructed above on or before April 30, 2018 to facilitate timely delivery.


The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: 1. Election of Directors Nominees: The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: 1a. Tanuja M. Dehne 2. Advisory vote on the compensation of our executive officers. 1b. Martin A. Kamarck The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR 1 YEAR on the following proposal: 1c. Stephen G. Kasnet 3. Advisory vote relating to the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. 1d. William Roth 1e. W. Reid Sanders The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: 1f. Thomas E. Siering 4. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. 1g. Brian C. Taylor NOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion on any matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. 1h. John A. Taylor 1i. Hope B. Woodhouse E43098-P05202 Voting Items


E43099-P05202


VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com UseQR Barcode aboveUse the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m.P.M. Eastern Time on May 14, 2018.June 5, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when      you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create      an electronic voting instruction form. GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. 590 MADISON AVENUE, 38TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10022 VOTEform.During The Meeting — Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2024You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use— 1-800-690-6903Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m.P.M. Eastern Time on May 14, 2018.June 5, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTEinstructions.VOTE BY MAIL Mark,MAILMark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51

Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO11717.TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E43092-P05202 KEEPV41538-P06147KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. GRANITERECORDSGRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. TheINC.The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the election of each director nominee listed in the following proposal:1. Election of Directors Nominees: DirectorsNominees:For Against Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. Tanuja M. Dehne The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR 1 YEAR on the following proposal: 1b. Martin A. Kamarck 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain ! ! ! ! 1c. Stephen G. Kasnet 3. Advisory vote relating to the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.Abstain1c. Sheila K. McGrath 1d. William Roth The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: 1e. W. Reid Sanders For Against Abstain 1e. John A. Taylor1f. Hope B. Woodhouse!!!! 1f. Thomas E. Siering 4. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as !!!!!our independent registered public accounting firmauditor for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. 1g. Brian C. Taylor NOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion on any matter that may properly 2024.!come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. 1h. John A. Taylor 1i. Hope B. Woodhouse The!!NOTE: To transact such other business as may properlyThe Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: ! ! ! 2. Advisory voteproposals 2 and 4 and EVERY YEAR for proposal 3.2.To approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers.Every yearTo approve on an advisory basis the frequency!Every!Every!2 years 3 years Abstain3.of future advisory votes regarding the compensation of our named executive officers.!!!!Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signatureofficer.Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date SignatureDateSignature (Joint Owners) Date

DateTHIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY1a.Tanuja M. Dehne!!!ForAgainstAbstain1b.Stephen G. Kasnet!!!4.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as!!!


[MISSING IMAGE: px_24graniteproxy01pg02-bw.jpg]

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The Annual Report and Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. E43093-P05202 GRANITEV41539-P06147GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. AnnualINC.Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 15, 2018 9:June 6, 2024 10:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time ThisTimeThis proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors TheDirectorsThe undersigned hereby authorizes and appoints John A. Taylor and Rebecca B. Sandberg,Michael J. Karber, and each of them, as proxies,proxy holders, with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually on Thursday, June 6, 2024, at Loews Regency Hotel, 540 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, on Tuesday, May 15, 2018, at 9:10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof, and to cast on behalf of the undersigned all votes that the undersigned is entitled to cast at such meeting and to otherwise represent the undersigned at the meeting with all powers possessed by the undersigned if personally present at the meeting. Whenmeeting.When properly executed, this proxy will be voted on the proposals set forth herein as directed by the stockholder, but if no direction is made in the space provided, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of all nominees for director, FOR the advisory vote on executive compensation, FOR the 1 year frequency option on the advisory vote relating to the frequency offor future advisory votes on executive compensation to be held EVERY YEAR, FOR ratification of the independent auditor appointment, of auditors, and according to the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. This proxy is revocable. Therevocable.The undersigned hereby revokes all previous proxies relating to the shares covered hereby and acknowledges receipt of the noticeNotice and proxy statementProxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. ContinuedStockholders.Continued and to be signed on reverse side


0001703644 4 2023-01-01 2023-12-31